this post was submitted on 27 Oct 2024
652 points (99.7% liked)

196

16407 readers
1982 users here now

Be sure to follow the rule before you head out.

Rule: You must post before you leave.

^other^ ^rules^

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
top 30 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] wh0_cares@lemmy.blahaj.zone 82 points 4 days ago

Gamers truly are the most oppressed class in society πŸ˜”

[–] BodilessGaze@sh.itjust.works 65 points 4 days ago (1 children)

That predates Shakespeare. Imagine if Shakespeare had written a play about gamer oppression.

[–] someguy3@lemmy.world 17 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Not violent enough for Shakespeare.

[–] umbraroze@lemmy.world 19 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

But it would have been great for a Shakespearian minor joke character bit.

GUARD: "See, milord, how in this year's almanack the booba hath been veil'd, compared to last year's edition."

KING: "Greatly?"

GUARD: "Yes, greatly indeed! Two inches of cloth more!"

KING: "Thou art a nutter and I ought to throw thee in the madhouse."

GUARD: "But you wouldn't dare, sire? Tales of your treachery and oppression already circle widely."

KING: "Thou shouldst consider thee lucky that we have to get the Hell onward with our plot."

[–] Jayjader@jlai.lu 30 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (1 children)

"dise-player, carder"
Ah, so this is probably some law trying to curb gambling-
"tenys player" wait, what? Were people betting on tennis matches back in the day or something?

[–] roguetrick@lemmy.world 9 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

Yeah. Even the king lost money betting on tennis.

Tennis was a spectator sport, which meant a great opportunity to show off your skills and to gamble! Both players and spectators could bet on the outcome, with the privy expenses showing that even the King could get it wrong. Between 1493 and 1499, Henry VII lost a total of Β£20

https://onthetudortrail.com/Blog/resources/life-in-tudor-england/tennis-in-tudor-times/

They kept trying to ban it in the city of London.

[–] kjaeselrek@lemmy.ml 22 points 4 days ago

Wow they really did target gamers, huh

[–] seaQueue@lemmy.world 12 points 4 days ago

What? They targeted gamers?!β€½

[–] RangerJosie@lemmy.world 3 points 3 days ago

Gamers should be oppressed harder. Not quite with extreme prejudice. But almost. Use rubber bullets. Actual full rubber. Not those sneaky "Rubber Bullets" with steel cores.

[–] uriel238@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 points 3 days ago

My experience in becoming a gamer is to graduate from Parker Brothers family tabletop games to Steve Jackson wargames to Dungeons and Dragons which was declared Satanic by the moral guardians.

So yep.

Behind the Bastards recent two-parter on The Masculinity Crisis pointed out that the Gamergate controversy really was about gamers who found their only man space was gaming getting upset as the market opened up to women and other non-dude-bros. (I was quietly playing Gone Home at the time not understanding what the big deal was.) Then Steve Bannon whipped them into a voting bloc and got Trump elected (with a popular minority but the EC) and now we're all sorry.

[–] TootSweet@lemmy.world 11 points 4 days ago

And that document was written by a time-traveling Anita Sarkeesian.

We should bring this back

[–] Benjaben@lemmy.world 7 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (1 children)

All I'm getting from this is that something called "tenya" (?) is probably really fun. And now I'm annoyed I've never gotten to play!

E: oh maybe just "tens". Screw it, whatever it is, deal me in lol

[–] konalt@lemmy.world 13 points 4 days ago (1 children)
[–] Benjaben@lemmy.world 8 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (1 children)

I'm assuming a dice game based around the number 10 most likely lol, but it is possible (and fun to imagine) that maybe rampant tennis enthusiasm needed to be quelled :) Weirder things have happened. Like a town dancing themselves to death.

[–] roguetrick@lemmy.world 3 points 3 days ago (1 children)

It was definitely tennis. Tennis had a lot of gambling involved. This was the time they were banning theaters too.

[–] Benjaben@lemmy.world 1 points 3 days ago

Well, I'll be!

[–] SharkAttak@kbin.melroy.org 7 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Maybe cause there was gambling involved too?

[–] Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world 15 points 4 days ago (1 children)

"Too"? It was ONLY because of gambling. To this day, the gambling industry cringetastically calls itself the "gaming industry"

[–] SharkAttak@kbin.melroy.org 1 points 3 days ago

Well it could also be cause the players were too noisy or rowdy, or some other (un)reason.

[–] roguetrick@lemmy.world 2 points 3 days ago

Just gotta be a liefull gamer.

[–] dandelion@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 4 days ago (1 children)

ContraPoints has a great Tangent video about Gamergate (I think you have to be a Patreon subscriber to get access to it, but it's seriously like $2 or something).

[–] driving_crooner@lemmy.eco.br 2 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Innuendo Studio have the ultimate explanation of Gamergate.

[–] dandelion@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Innuendo Studio

I went looking for their video on gamergate and didn't find anything - do you have a link?

[–] Warl0k3@lemmy.world 2 points 4 days ago (2 children)

God I hope this is satire.

[–] aeronmelon@lemmy.world 24 points 4 days ago (1 children)

I just looked it up, the term β€œgamer” predates the term β€œsatire” by about 50 years.

[–] zante@slrpnk.net 3 points 3 days ago

Aristophanes would like a brief word.

[–] dtrain@lemmy.world 10 points 4 days ago

600 years and homie thinks it still stings.