This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.
Well, yeah. It's pretty much the same as SearXNG. Except paid, closed source and needs an account to function. The results are better though, I'll give you that.
...and the pricing is absurd. I'd like to disable all the AI bullshit and get a discount.
If it was self hostable, I'd always recommend it over SearXNG. Let's say that it's a better but closed source and paid SearXNG alternative.
needs an account to function
How would they be able to provide a way for you to filter and/or downrank certain (known "less helpful") domains without you having an account?
You can store them in the browser locally.
So you'd need to set up your whole block list on every single device you use?
For a privacy focused search engine. At least the option would be nice. I personally just use my PC and phone, so I'd only need to set it up twice. Additionally, I imagine an export/import function wouldn't be too hard to set up.
SearXNG generates a URL that contains all the preferences you've set, so it's a matter of copying it and setting it as a default search engine on another device.
Sync it with firefox?
If they have a great meta-search algorithm, users would be able to search without an account and see how great the results are. Then, when a user wants to personalize ranking and block sites, they can create an account.
I always assumed that they make you create an account to track search usage and cut you off once you hit the free tier limit.
SearXNG's result quality and blocking functions are much worse than Kagi's in my experience.
edit: Downvoting personal experiences. Lemmy going strong again. ;-)
Kagi has good search results and they are presented well. It also has some useful features like forbidding certain sites and prioritizing others. I like that by paying I'm the customer and not the product. And their "small web" initiative is commendable.
That said, I've been a customer for nine months on an annual subscription, and I will not be renewing. The first reason is that I find them just too expensive for what they do. The second is that, even being that expensive, they're not breaking even. That undermines my trust in their future as a search engine and makes me less interested in paying a little extra for a good cause.
even being that expensive, they're not breaking even
huh, I guess starting their own T-shirt business wasn't that great of a move after all
People in the tech community who care about their privacy need to understand that if a product is not open source it should NOT be trusted. Transparency is a necessary factor in guaranteeing privacy, otherwise we cannot see and prove if a person or company's claim to privacy is true.
But be careful, being open source does not inherently make it trustworthy. It could be doing something nefarious that just hasn’t been caught yet.
Indeed.
However, proprietary code cannot be trusted to be trustworthy. FOSS can it's just not guaranteed.
If they're indexing multiple sources and then making a custom experience for the user - based on multiple sources and user input. Then that to me, sounds like a valid service to to allowed to sell? I struggle to see the issue here?
\not a kagi user.
Kagi doesn’t hide that they use API calls to multiple sources for each search, they are fairly upfront about honestly. The benefits of use Jagi IME are the results are great, the site is fast and gets out of the way, it’s fairly affordable for what it provides, and the goals of the company is in line with mine (namely to find a thing I’m searching for). They are well funded enough to give me confidence that I’m not going to have to configure yet another search engine, and the integrate into pretty much all my access points easily as a default search engine.
I have seen no reason to think they abuse their position to impact my privacy, and bring closed source does not automatically make them evil. You included no alternatives that are open source, and the ones I explored were either difficult to get setup, required me to run something on my own infrastructure, or didn’t provide the integrations or results I expect. Kagi does.
Kagi isn’t perfect, and there are a ton of suggestions on their feature tracker that users rightly want implemented (including open sourcing more of their code-base). But as a paid search engine that makes me not the product, it does that job well.
What are they starting to do that is shady and why do you think don’t respect privacy? (I couldn’t see anything on the document you mentioned)
They deleted the fact that they are a metasearch engine and added a touch of marketing.
I am not saying they don't respect my privacy, what I am saying is that due to their low value product, it can be replaced with better opensource product that can be guranteed to never leak your data compared to Kagi black box.
Can you give us some example of better open-source product?
They deleted the fact that they are a metasearch engine
The diff you linked to has the new text of
Our search results also include anonymized API calls to all major search result providers worldwide
You're being very disingenuous. Actually, no - your statement above is flat out wrong.
I tried SearXNG but the UI/UX was so shitty that I'd honestly rather pay for Kagi. Lots of people love it because it's open source and are willing to 100% look past all UI/UX problems, which is a very common problem with open source in general.
Also, the actual quality of the results was garbage compared to Kagi.
I think this is a fairly benign move with a valid explanation that has been taken out of context in order to be more inflamitory
How so?
They updated their description of how their search engine works. The new description is still factual, while being slightly easier to understand. The new description also has some fancy marketing flair. They still make it pretty clear that they use other search engines via anonymous calls.
I wouldn't call that shady at all... Unless maybe I'm completely missing the point here.
People basically pay them to search Yandex and Brave for them.
Now you're not going to believe this, ladies and gentlemen, there was a time - not too longer ago in fact - where people called these metacrawlers, and they were beloved. People would say "Dogpile" yes, that might help, because - bare with me again - search was shit. But, comparing lot of different shit sources would generally give you ok information, and generally reveal at least a lot of different sources which could help find and gather information.
Now I'm not calling Kagi reputable in anyway, but if metacrawling helped with the situation before, maybe we should try it again.
Basically, you're surprised that people will pay money for someone else to host and run a service for them instead of hosting it themselves?
I do and I like the results? Like, I get how we have to be cautious with closed-source private services. This just reads to me as clickbait to put down on people that use kagi lol. Also searxng isn't really private either as you can't be sure what your instance is actually running, and self-hosting just links everything to your IP as other people mentioned...
I don’t quite understand how this is an issue.
I mean personally I’m happy with anonymised ads from DDG in return for anonymised Bing searches (+their own guffins) but I think it’s fair enough, if you really want to see no ads, that some turn to Kagi.
Self hosted SearXNG. Period.
What alternative do you use for indexed searches of the fediverse? Do any of the open meta engines allow source ranking like Kagi does? Looked at the git changes. Think you will need to point out the shady ones. It's not inherently obvious. Do you have a specific recommendation for an open Kagi competitor (that has fediverse indexing as mentioned)? I've heard people talk about DDG options and those pale in comparison with real world use in my use cases.
Edit: also, your title reads like you are making an effort toward being insulting or derogatory. It's not a great way to initiate productive conversation.
I have been contemplating moving to SearNXG for a few weeks, but I have a hard time finding whether I can configure things like domain down-ranking/blocking or custom bangs and lenses, does anyone know if you can do that on a user or instance-level?
