this post was submitted on 09 Nov 2024
24 points (100.0% liked)

Political Discussion and Commentary

230 readers
20 users here now

A place to discuss politics and offer political commentary. Self posts are preferred, but links to current events and news are allowed. Opinion pieces are welcome on a case by case basis, and discussion of and disagreement about issues is encouraged!

The intent is for this community to be an area for open & respectful discussion on current political issues, news & events, and that means we all have a responsibility to be open, honest, and sincere. We place as much emphasis on good content as good behavior, but the latter is more important if we want to ensure this community remains healthy and vibrant.

Content Rules:

  1. Self posts preferred.
  2. Opinion pieces and editorials are allowed on a case by case basis.
  3. No spam or self promotion.
  4. Do not post grievances about other communities or their moderators.

Commentary Rules

  1. Don’t be a jerk or do anything to prevent honest discussion.
  2. Stay on topic.
  3. Don’t criticize the person, criticize the argument.
  4. Provide credible sources whenever possible.
  5. Report bad behavior, please don’t retaliate. Reciprocal bad behavior will reflect poorly on both parties.
  6. Seek rule enforcement clarification via private message, not in comment threads.
  7. Abide by Lemmy's terms of service (attacks on other users, privacy, discrimination, etc).

Please try to up/downvote based on contribution to discussion, not on whether you agree or disagree with the commenter.

Partnered Communities:

Politics

Science

founded 2 months ago
MODERATORS
 

I sincerely don't know to what degree Trump and his crew may change the US, and by the looks of other countries, it could be as extreme as silencing the opposition by force. Are there any efforts to protect dissent? Can this be planned for and successfully fought back before it becomes a problem? Do you have a different view entirely?

top 7 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] bluejay@lemm.ee 20 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (3 children)

Well I've raised it in other threads that people who expect violent conflict should prepare by familiarizing themselves with firearms, buying them, and training survival skills. But people are afraid. The idea was argued into the ground.

People don't want to believe, or those that do, don't think they cant do anything. I'd like to believe that there's enough checks and balances to deal with any attempts of demolishing democracy. I have a hard time believing that generals, or even troops in general would turn their guns inward. They signed up to defend democracy and freedom on behalf of their countrymen. Not destroy it and kill them.

But at the same time, I just don't know. Most are too lazy and complacent to try and organize. When I've tried people shrug. The people think they want what Trump is selling.

Either way, I'd say prepare yourself. That way, if things do organize, you're ready. I've been ready just for fun, not for anti-fascism purposes. I like hunting and living off the land when I can. Turns out they're useful skills in situations that may unfold. We shall see.

[–] Assman@sh.itjust.works 6 points 2 weeks ago

I have a hard time believing that generals, or even troops in general would turn their guns inward

Agree, I see a military junta being way more likely than them just blindly following orders. So many high ranking officials openly despise him, and the Pentagon already operates with nigh impunity anyway.

[–] solsangraal@lemmy.zip 2 points 2 weeks ago

everything everyone's ever done online basically belongs to trump now. anything short of dropping off the grid and vanishing might just be playing pretend

[–] GBU_28@lemm.ee 1 points 2 weeks ago

Also people don't know how to eat out of mre's or less a day. It isn't normal and it takes practice

[–] peopleproblems@lemmy.world 8 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)
  1. There is no "protecting dissent." Dissent will be outlawed full stop. This will be done by crazy means to make it sound viable to the Constitution.

  2. There will be several levels of organized means of dissent. You could say a "resistance", an "underground", and a "rebellion."

  3. The resistance will be collective acts to prevent the admin from doing whatever they want. You may have seen governors come out and say they will not let federal troops into their cities - they have the authority over state national guard to do this.

  4. The underground: this will be quiet forms of dissent. Visiting family in other states to bring them birth control, or take them across state lines for "routine medical care." They will circumvent policies without attraction of the authorities.

  5. Rebellion. These will be insurgent actions risking life and limb to oppese enforcement efforts directly.

Dissent cant be fully outlawed until trump manages to kill off entire state governments. Federalism will somewhat resist the authoritarianism of the federal government. Red states tho, they're fucked. Purple states becomes literal battle ground states with the republican elements in the state government covertly helping the federal government.

[–] IDKWhatUsernametoPutHereLolol@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

You better hope democratic led states resist his authoritarianism. If Democratic Governors orders state law enforcement to not help the federal agents, they only have limited manpower to do anything.

If trump does anything extreme like federalize the national guard to shoot dissidents, Democratic Governors might be able to delare those actions illegal and order the national guard to stand down. Hopefully the national guard would not listen to trump.

Red states are kinda fucked tho.

Edit: And I want to add that the US is not a unitary state, it has a federal system. States can still resist the autocrazation of the federal government, if they are willing to. Its not all doom and gloom.