Ah yes, more rules.
I want more options to autonomously choose, not more rules. Also we already had this several times, sex-negative feminism, straight edge etc.
This is reactionary.
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
Ah yes, more rules.
I want more options to autonomously choose, not more rules. Also we already had this several times, sex-negative feminism, straight edge etc.
This is reactionary.
Good, overpopulation is a problem anyway, people volunteering not to have children seems pretty helpful for that. Same with mgtow
4B movement
Women self-identifying their value as sexual in nature
That was expected to happen. And it will lead to radicalization of various movements, with frustrated men or women.