this post was submitted on 10 Nov 2024
740 points (92.8% liked)

politics

19150 readers
2858 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
(page 9) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] theywilleatthestars@lemmy.world -1 points 3 weeks ago (4 children)

Still don't get the point of swearing off men entirely instead of just targeting misogynists

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] vordalack@lemm.ee -1 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

This is a childish and illogical response to what’s been happening. The 4B movement isn’t practical to achieve its desired affects.

A better approach is for white women to have more interracial relationships. It drives the right wing voting base insane when you do that. Black or Chinese men create the most seethe and butthurt.

This way, women still get to have sex, form loving relationships, have children, and not suffer from the consequences of 4B.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Timmy_Jizz_Tits@lemmy.world -1 points 3 weeks ago

I'm somewhere between cis male and Ace. My dream girl would be all about this lol I'm so conflicted.

[–] TheReturnOfPEB@reddthat.com -2 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

seeing as women are human beings some woman would use this "system" to separate some guy from his current partner so that she could abscond with him.

and 52% of women from my demographic voted for trump so enjoy the delusions

[–] drunkpostdisaster@lemmy.world -2 points 3 weeks ago

Women are better off without us.

[–] Tedesche@lemmy.world -4 points 3 weeks ago

They’re protesting no sex against a rapist?

Yeah, I can’t imagine how this is going to turn out….

[–] MooseTheDog@lemmy.world -4 points 3 weeks ago

Just some money making drama any news site can run for clicks. Obviously this won't make a difference in anything. Nothing about it is constructive, which definitely makes it poignant, but will never garner wider support.

Kill your local heroin dealer.

[–] VerbFlow@lemmy.world -4 points 3 weeks ago

I don't think this will work. Say what you want about non-Conservative men, the Conservative ones never cared about consent. It's like a slave refusing to work. The best adage is "the beatings will continue until morale improves". Rapists always act the same toward their victim, no matter the age, and they are best dealt with in the electric chair.

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›