Also the cost of fixing a horse is a new horse
this post was submitted on 11 Nov 2024
723 points (97.3% liked)
Greentext
4482 readers
1703 users here now
This is a place to share greentexts and witness the confounding life of Anon. If you're new to the Greentext community, think of it as a sort of zoo with Anon as the main attraction.
Be warned:
- Anon is often crazy.
- Anon is often depressed.
- Anon frequently shares thoughts that are immature, offensive, or incomprehensible.
If you find yourself getting angry (or god forbid, agreeing) with something Anon has said, you might be doing it wrong.
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
0 emissions? Methane from cattle is a large contributer to climate change. If we had as much horses as we have cars, the amount of methane would be too much to handle.
Cars run on gas, horses run on grass.
Livestock contribute by land use (deforestation, crops for feed, pasture), water consumption, and the fossil fuel used in logistics processes (farm equipment, transport, electricity, etc...)
But anyways, animal farts come from preexisting carbon in the biosphere. Car farts come from extracting previously sequestered carbon. So without extractive processes, and with ethical land use/management, the atmospheric methane wouldn't have a significant impact.
Also you fart too. So there's that...
But anyways, animal farts come from preexisting carbon in the biosphere. Car farts come from extracting previously sequestered carbon. So without extractive processes, and with ethical land use/management, the atmospheric methane wouldn't have a significant impact.
Methane is 81x worse that CO2 over 20 Years, so if it came from atmospheric carbon it's only 80x as bad.
load more comments
(1 replies)
Also you fart too. So there's that...
So you're saying to solve climate change we need to remove the humans? You might be on to something there.
A few select ones would make a massive difference.
Fuck your Honda Civic, I've a horse outside
Wow that was a blast from the past! Still a bit of a banger too!
load more comments
(3 replies)
I think this shows a kind of intellectual impairment.