this post was submitted on 12 Nov 2024
332 points (98.8% liked)

News

23387 readers
2181 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Could a tariff war erupt between the United States and Mexico? A top Mexican official said his country might retaliate if the Trump administration placed steep tariffs on Mexico.

top 39 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] shittydwarf@lemmy.dbzer0.com 100 points 1 week ago

They can't intimidate little shitler, he doesn't even understand the meaning of the word tariff!!

[–] Zier@fedia.io 93 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Racist America voted for inflation to rise. This is what people wanted. It will happen. The fat orange pumpkin will annoy so many American allies and destroy the US economy. This is what people voted for.

[–] TrickDacy@lemmy.world 43 points 1 week ago (1 children)

The only part you left out is that they did it specifically to do the opposite. Which only a moron could believe would've panned out

[–] Zier@fedia.io 15 points 1 week ago

Exactly. They thought the criminal serial liar wouldn't lie to them. Have they not learned that trump only cares about trump? Clearly not.

[–] Treczoks@lemmy.world 66 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Always remember: the cartels don't pay tariffs when smuggling drugs.

[–] Badeendje@lemmy.world 11 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

The border between the US and Mexico will be transformed into a military zone. It will be interesting to see how they handle all the private land at the border. ~~Imminent~~ Eminent domain probably. Then they deploy the military and spend ungodly amounts of money there instead of in Afghanistan.

[–] MutilationWave@lemmy.world 14 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Eminent Domain. It is imminent though.

[–] Badeendje@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago
[–] MadBigote@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Do you really think that would happen? Trump was already president and he couldn't do shit about the border. The Republicans hold now the government, do they could pass extra funding, but I doubt it.

[–] Badeendje@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

What extra funding? The US just completed Afghanistan mission that cost billions. Now they only need to deploy to the southern border.. it will be cheaper. Plus if it really needs extra funds.. if there is anything the US always had funding for is the military. So yes as a non Americans I see them turning the border into a Korean style border. Possibly declaring a zone around the border as a special territory to make an end run around posse comitatus.

[–] ayyy@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 week ago (1 children)

That war was funded with debt, that the next generation will still be paying down. It’s not like there was a magic firehouse of money that just needs to be redirected.

[–] Badeendje@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago

But didn't you hear? With the tariffs, trump is going to be raking in so much money, they are going to be paying down the debt! And you got to have it..

[–] SendMePhotos@lemmy.world 8 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Also remember... All Mexicans and iLlEgAl immigrants are criminals.

[–] Kusimulkku@lemm.ee 1 points 1 week ago

I mean, true for illegal immigrants, obviously.

[–] Gullible@sh.itjust.works 48 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (3 children)

What does the US export to Mexico?

Edit: mostly building materials, chemicals, machinery, food, and oil

[–] ThePantser@lemmy.world 49 points 1 week ago (3 children)

And soon to be people, millions of people. I wish trump would keel over.

[–] gedaliyah@lemmy.world 54 points 1 week ago

In all seriousness, there are women in Texas who are escaping into Mexico to receive reproductive healthcare.

[–] astanix@lemmy.world 22 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Bo matter how he dies he will be a martyr to his people. His death will fix nothing.

[–] Fiivemacs@lemmy.ca 22 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Who cares, he'd be dead

They already think whatever they want evn when it's proven over and over to be false, lies and made up bs

[–] astanix@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago

It feels like the beginnings of North Korea. Great leader, if he does die in private they will keep him alive for months by continuing to tweet in his name. The current GOP is absolutely insane.

[–] MrVilliam@lemmy.world 18 points 1 week ago (1 children)

You're absolutely right and I hate it. Once he finally dies, prepare for neotrumpism, which is the same thing but more quiet and headed by smarter, prettier, younger people. And it could happen sooner than people are prepared for. Vance will be a heartbeat away from the presidency. Who do you think will be in his inner circle?

[–] GetOffMyLan@programming.dev 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Hopefully there'll be a power vacuum and all the politicians currently sucking his dick will fight for control of the base. This will hopefully splinter them and they can quietly fight amongst themselves.

[–] MrVilliam@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago

Conservatives are generally hierarchical pussies. Whoever is high ranking and assertive about being the new leader will be the new leader and everybody will line up to be his footrest. Even without a decent choice, they will push somebody into the position even if they're bland garbage. Source: the shit show that was them searching for a House Speaker and settling for Mike Johnson.

The ones with the balls to break away from the party only did so to follow trump, and they now control the party because eventually the cowards got in line like good little followers. I think that trump losing this time may have convinced enough to steer the party back to a less extreme position, but his win taught them that the country is ready for full on christofascism, and there's nothing to be gained from the inevitable failure that would be an attempt to fracture/mutiny the party. They're more evil than dumb.

[–] Today@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago (1 children)

And then we will have sofa king Vance.

[–] UltraGiGaGigantic@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 week ago

I am sofa king we Todd edd

[–] SendMePhotos@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

Only if he and his butt buddy are in the same car and crash together. Otherwise one will just take over in the other's absence.

[–] MadBigote@lemmy.world 21 points 1 week ago

People looking for affordable health care.

[–] rumba@lemmy.zip 14 points 1 week ago

Mostly electronics, pharmaceuticals, medical equipment. Honestly though, that's probably just a matter of convenience because we import most of that stuff.

I see interests colliding in the future and I'm curious to how it plays out. Mexico is clearly going to be much less diplomatically available for Trump, so long as he keep his same rhetoric and plans going. This significantly lowers the leverage US auto makers have in lobbying Uncle Sam to use diplomacy to keep Chinese EV plants out of Mexico. Trump certainly seems to be driving Mexico toward China, and his economic moves in his first term drove China to Mexico, these bridges are already built, many of the Chinese goods that he kept out of the US simply went south.

[–] magnetosphere@fedia.io 8 points 1 week ago

I hope every country does the same.

[–] friend_of_satan@lemmy.world 8 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Honest question: how does hurting consumers even more solve the problem? Is it a deterrent to the original tariffs or something else?

[–] dance_ninja@lemmy.world 27 points 1 week ago (1 children)

It's a retaliatory tactic. If the US is reducing the incentive to do trade with Mexico, why should Mexico continue to allow trade with the US without penalty?

The US isn't in the same economic position as it was 10-20 years ago, and countries have seen the crappy tactics Trump used last time he was in office. I'm sure they're more willing to respond in kind or even cut ties this time if their relationships becomes more abusive.

[–] MadBigote@lemmy.world 0 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Still, trump couldn't really put tariffs on Mexican imports without doing something about our free trade agreement.

[–] dance_ninja@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago

I'm sure he's willing to mess with that too. Everything is transactional and subject to change with this guy.

[–] ayyy@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 week ago

Laws mean nothing to Republicans. We now live in a dictatorship.

[–] RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world 10 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

In addition to the other answer - it isn’t about hurting consumers. They don’t think that far ahead. They’re toddlers who can’t think past their immediate feelings.

It’s been proven time and again that republicans don’t care about the reality of a situation, only the feels they get about it. So making tariffs is a retaliatory maneuver that has absolutely no follow through - IOW, if you make tariffs against Chinese electric car imports the wise thing to do would be to boost US manufacture of the same with tax incentives or similar increase US buyers and manufacturers’ uptake of home-grown EVs. But that’s not what trump does.

That’s not what the people who voted for him want. They don’t govern. They want to punish everyone that ever slighted them, perceived or real.

They just lash out without a plan in an act of spite and revenge, and when the consequences come home to roost, like price hikes and increasing inflation, in true narcissist fashion, they yet again blame others and lash out more.

[–] PugJesus@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago

Don't worry. Trump will just blame Mexico for not being a team player, and his base will eat it up.

[–] SkyNTP@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 week ago

Consumption tax for everyone! Unless you all want to go to work in a shoe factory.

[–] toiletobserver@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago

clutches pearls