this post was submitted on 15 Nov 2024
957 points (98.8% liked)

Political Memes

5479 readers
2547 users here now

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

Be civilJokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

No misinformationDon’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

Posts should be memesRandom pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

No bots, spam or self-promotionFollow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
(page 2) 31 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] UltraGiGaGigantic@lemmy.ml 4 points 6 days ago (1 children)

To be fair we were lied to growing up. Be nice to others and santa.

[–] Shardikprime@lemmy.world 3 points 6 days ago

I'd believe it when I see it

[–] TheReturnOfPEB@reddthat.com 2 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (1 children)

Checks and balances wasn't about avoiding fascism.

It was to make sure all three branches of governments stayed in power over the body politic.

And they still are in power.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Sam_Bass@lemmy.world -1 points 6 days ago (6 children)

Chink in that armor was allow people without education, attention, and just plain common sense to vote

[–] postmateDumbass@lemmy.world 3 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Kinda why the Electoral College exists.

But it was too cool to hate on it.

Because the people running the game know without it the game becomes who has the best propaganda.

[–] Sam_Bass@lemmy.world 2 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Well, as you have seen, the game of propaganda was won by the ignorant, dark visioned, loudmouthed clowns

[–] postmateDumbass@lemmy.world 1 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (1 children)

Considering the power dynamic, is calling them the ignorant ones correct?

load more comments (1 replies)

Nah, there's an easier and less fascistic solution than taking away voting rights: don't let felons run for office.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] ImplyingImplications@lemmy.ca 85 points 1 week ago (4 children)

America was built on the ideas of freedom and equality by slave owners who didn't think women should be allowed to vote.

[–] Rhaedas@fedia.io 2 points 6 days ago

But they got it started and we changed some things. We just didn't change enough, or perhaps changed the wrong things.

[–] fubbernuckin@lemmy.dbzer0.com 23 points 1 week ago

I mean, they did give an earnest try at preventing a king from happening, and it did work for a couple hundred years.

[–] yeahiknow3@lemmings.world 12 points 1 week ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (8 children)

Don’t forget they were also terrified of democracy. The Senate is one of the most comically anti-democratic institutions ever concocted. Wyoming has as much power as California. I mean it beggars belief that anyone but a complete imbecile could agree to something like that.

[–] Kusimulkku@lemm.ee 1 points 5 days ago (1 children)

For an united states sort of setup having one level of government representing the states particularly makes sense to me. EU has a similar setup (but much more complicated) and a suggestion that it'd just be based on popular vote would cause a civil war.

[–] yeahiknow3@lemmings.world 1 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (6 children)

The EU has a representative setup, which is democratic. Nothing like the US Senate, which is designed to rob people of representation.

Again, governments justify their existence by serving people, full stop, not arbitrary land masses. What’s next, a tertiary chamber of Congress for corporations?

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] Shard@lemmy.world -1 points 6 days ago (1 children)

The founding fathers were correct. A pure democracy is also known as mob rule. Anytime you can get 51% to agree with you, you can do whatever you like.

If 51% vote to take the homes of black people, that's decided and done.

Which is why modern democracies are all some form of representative democracy. Which in theory is supposed to act as a sort of check and balance on the system.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] AnUnusualRelic@lemmy.world 84 points 1 week ago (24 children)

Maybe it's time you guys rewrote your constitution into something more modern instead of treating the old one as a holy scripture handed down from Olympus.

But I doubt that'll ever happen.

[–] Sweetpeaches69@lemmy.world 44 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Trump is about to rewrite our Constitution, just not the way it should be written.

[–] AnUnusualRelic@lemmy.world 16 points 1 week ago (2 children)

If he does, at least it'll show that it can be rewritten.

[–] postmateDumbass@lemmy.world 1 points 6 days ago

Like all those amendments did?

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (23 replies)
[–] UsernameHere@lemmy.world 45 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Regulatory capture and citizens united both exist to undo those checks and balances. No system is immune to corruption.

[–] yeahiknow3@lemmings.world 20 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Interestingly the US system was always more vulnerable to corruption, and everyone knew it. Our executive branch is far too powerful. That’s why when the US has engaged in nation building they never install governments like ours. Germany, Japan, Iraq, etc. the pentagon always insists on a parliamentary system, because they’re better in every way (less prone to grid lock, less prone to tyranny of the minority, weaker executive, etc.).

[–] Badeendje@lemmy.world 35 points 1 week ago (1 children)

A lot of people are being shown that a lot of stuff that kept their country going was decorum, shame and tradition, not rule of law.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›