this post was submitted on 18 Nov 2024
272 points (94.2% liked)

politics

19120 readers
2248 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 40 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] cabron_offsets@lemmy.world 109 points 4 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (8 children)

It’s gonna be dr oz. Edit: FUCK.

[–] iAmTheTot@sh.itjust.works 57 points 4 days ago (1 children)

I hate that this is a valid prediction.

[–] Bluefalcon@discuss.tchncs.de 16 points 3 days ago

The only doctor he knows better is Dr. Pepper.

[–] octopus_ink@lemmy.ml 7 points 2 days ago (1 children)

It’s gonna be dr oz.

You called it.

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 2 days ago

Not the same position. But close.

[–] hopesdead@startrek.website 25 points 4 days ago (1 children)

In that case I’m gonna blame Oprah Winfrey for that one.

I already do

[–] iAmTheTot@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)
[–] ripcord@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

Close, as in really super close...? One might even say, accurate?

[–] iAmTheTot@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 days ago

Well, no, because he wasn't picked for surgeon general.

[–] tburkhol@lemmy.world 10 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Who was that demon-sperm doctor? Close runner-up.

[–] TexasDrunk@lemmy.world 7 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Stella Immanuel, the doctor down the road from me. It's a good pick because she's insane, she's a woman, she's a person of color, and she's an immigrant. So she'll be a multiple token to "prove" how he's not against any of those people.

[–] AngryRobot@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

They don't give 2 shits if we think their racist, sexist, or homophobic. They revel in those names. So do their followers.

[–] TexasDrunk@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago

Some are absolutely exactly who you have described. Some want to pretend that it's really the Democrats that are super racist so they keep around their tokens so they can say "I have a black friend!". Others are entirely disengaged and don't give the slightest shit about it one way or another.

They're not a monolith and they have to pander to each of these groups differently. For the first they pander to literal members of organized Nazi groups and peddle shit like the great replacement theory. For the second they appoint folks like this and point out folks like Gregory Cheadle and say "That's my African American!". For the third they yell about how prices have gone up and promise they'll bring them down with voodoo economics. It doesn't matter that the economics are lies. It doesn't matter that they're using women and people of color as props. All that matters is they tell enough conflicting things that everyone gets to latch on to their own lie and say that everything else was just bluster.

[–] joyjoy@lemm.ee 2 points 4 days ago

If he could spell it, it'd probably be Dr Frankenstein

[–] thesohoriots@lemmy.world 1 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Nah Dr. Drew is far more friendly with his ilk.

[–] Nollij@sopuli.xyz 2 points 3 days ago (1 children)

But Dr Drew is a reasonably competent doctor.

More importantly, would he be an obedient servant of the king, and follow his bidding (and delusions) without question? Because that's the only thing that really matters here.

[–] thesohoriots@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago

Ah, Dr. Oz just got tapped for CMS. You’re right lol

[–] octopus_ink@lemmy.ml 0 points 4 days ago

FUUCK. You are almost certainly correct.

[–] Donkter@lemmy.world 35 points 4 days ago (1 children)

How is Trump being trolled by this?

[–] ZeroCool@slrpnk.net 37 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (1 children)

He’s not. But several years ago the media latched onto a well established term from “internet culture” without understanding (or perhaps caring) what it was actually describing, and decided that it meant ridiculing something on social media. It’s an example of a subculture’s slang getting thoroughly corrupted through mainstream exposure until it no longer means what it once did.

[–] webghost0101@sopuli.xyz 18 points 4 days ago (1 children)

This headline is basically “Have you seen this meme?” and nothing more.

Its then shared on the same websites as memes get posted.

Such enlightened age of information we live in.

[–] ZeroCool@slrpnk.net 6 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (1 children)

While I agree with your point, this isn't an indictment of journalism. Comicsands.com is George Takei's personal buzzfeed clone. I love George Takei but it's not an actual news source, it's a meme blog. Personally, I don't think it belongs in any serious news oriented communities.

[–] webghost0101@sopuli.xyz 1 points 3 days ago

That just sounds like a tabloid with extra steps.

However i am not one to argue with subjective literature for entertainment but in this place mistook it for attempted journalism.

Would it fit better in /memes? It is not a meme but contains some and adds context.

[–] jagged_circle@feddit.nl 9 points 3 days ago

Please don't. Fascists dont understand satire. They're going to do exactly what you say

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 20 points 3 days ago

If they are "trolling" on Xitter, they are just trolling themselves, in the end. It helps out Elon and he's in the tank for donvict.

[–] Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works 5 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I just want him to appoint El Chapo as head of the DEA

[–] Freefall@lemmy.world 5 points 2 days ago

I am appointing THE LATE GREAT El Chapo, good guy, best guy, never met him, I hear great things, AS HEAD OF a little thing I like to call....deeah, or Dee Ee......Ay....like the word idea, without the I....there is NO I in IDEA, my father used to say....

[–] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 4 points 3 days ago

I met a professor of engineering named Dr Doom once, I think he’d make a fitting surgeon general for trump. Unqualified and ominous

[–] CM400@lemmy.world 13 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Dr. Hannibal Lecter, obvs.

[–] GladiusB@lemmy.world 1 points 3 days ago

He thinks he's a real guy. I wonder what Anthony Hopkins would say?

[–] Today@lemmy.world 8 points 4 days ago (1 children)
[–] slurpeesoforion@startrek.website 11 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Kevorkian, besides being dead, acted out of a sense of morality. Nothing could be further than Trump's intention.

[–] AbidanYre@lemmy.world 2 points 4 days ago

So that puts him a few spots below Mengele on the list of candidates.

[–] Bishma@discuss.tchncs.de 6 points 4 days ago

If Dr Spaceman was real, you know he'd be in the running. That or he'd be the guy in the WH giving out pills like he's the candy shop guy from Willy Wonka.

[–] yesman@lemmy.world 6 points 4 days ago (1 children)

I keep waiting for Taylor-Greene to be appointed Secretary of the hurricane machine.

[–] adarza@lemmy.ca 3 points 4 days ago

afaik, noaa and nasa are still up for bidding.

[–] phdepressed@sh.itjust.works 4 points 4 days ago
[–] DoucheBagMcSwag@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 4 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

Shit journalism.

Look I absolutely despise trump but I'm ready to block this instance because of the incessant rage bait

[–] thesohoriots@lemmy.world 2 points 4 days ago

When he inevitably fires the pick, it’ll be “Czary, Not Czary”