this post was submitted on 19 Nov 2024
1043 points (97.6% liked)

People Twitter

5258 readers
661 users here now

People tweeting stuff. We allow tweets from anyone.

RULES:

  1. Mark NSFW content.
  2. No doxxing people.
  3. Must be a tweet or similar
  4. No bullying or international politcs
  5. Be excellent to each other.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
(page 3) 16 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Seeders@sh.itjust.works 0 points 2 days ago

All tools get misused.

[–] SaharaMaleikuhm@feddit.org -3 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Eh I just let it write my bash scripts. A bit of trial and error with ChatGPT beats having to read the ffmpeg or imagemagick docs.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Randelung@lemmy.world -3 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Because realistically, that time is zero.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world -1 points 2 days ago (2 children)

In another thread, I was curious about the probability of reaching the age of 60 while living in the US.

Google gave me an assortment of links to people asking similar questions on Quora, and to some generic actuarial data, and to some totally unrelated bullshit.

ChatGPT gave me a multi-paragraph response referencing its data sources and providing both a general life expectancy and a specific answer broken out by gender. I asked ChatGPT how it reached this answer, and it proceeded to show its work. If I wanted to verify the work myself, ChatGPT gave me source material to cross-check and the calculations it used to find the answer. Google didn't even come close to answering the question, much less producing the data it used to reach the answer.

I'm as big an AI skeptic as anyone, but it can't be denied that generic search engines have degraded significantly. I feel like I'm using Alta Vista in the 90s whenever I query Google in the modern day. The AI systems do a marginally better job than old search engines were doing five years ago, before enshittification hit with full force.

It sucks that AI is better, but it IS better.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›