this post was submitted on 20 Nov 2024
293 points (98.0% liked)

News

23353 readers
3940 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] rollerbang@lemmy.world 12 points 16 hours ago (4 children)

I might still not understand but... Landlords have to pay insurance as well. Why would they be the exception. They have all the same costs and also want to make a profit. How can rent be cheaper then?

[–] Badeendje@lemmy.world 11 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

Because if you buy a house, it's just you and the bank, so you need to cover the banks risk for you as an individual, meaning higher interest rates. Larger purchases, or a group of houses are covered by different loan types, flexible rates at for example international rated plus half a point.. and that is mich cheaper. The rate might fluctuate.. but if the government strongarms the fed to keep the loans practically free, companies borrow for free plus half a point. And that is a lot of difference.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Tilgare@lemmy.world 4 points 15 hours ago

Because on average, I imagine very few rental homes are brand new constructions/purchases so their mortgage is a couple years old and lower than if someone bought that same home today.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Free_Opinions@feddit.uk 16 points 19 hours ago (2 children)

Highly dependent on where one lives I guess. My friend just rented a new apartment and his rent is over double what my mortage payments are. That's also money he is never getting back where as in my case my house is paid in about 15 years after which I own the damn thing and the monthly mortage payment drops off entirely. Excluding mortage, the montly cost of owning my house is 275€ which includes water and electricity.

[–] teawrecks@sopuli.xyz 8 points 17 hours ago (6 children)

Excluding mortage, the montly cost of owning my house is 275€ which includes water and electricity.

That's also excluding regular maintenance or emergency repairs that a landlord would be (often reluctantly) responsible for. It is also possible to do big, expensive, necessary renovations on a house and have it hardly affect the value at all.

[–] Free_Opinions@feddit.uk 4 points 13 hours ago

My mortage payments for one year would cover all maintenance I've done to the house during the 8 years I've lived here including an entire bathroom remodel. Obviously someone less handy would need to hire someone to do the jobs I've done myself so that helps a little with the costs, but still. The maintenance costs for my house aren't even in the top 5 expenses I have.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] Raiderkev@lemmy.world 6 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

It's not about what your mortgage payment is. Interest rates are significantly higher now. See how much the same house costs at the current price and interest rates. Most likely it's significantly higher now as both rates and prices have increased.

[–] Free_Opinions@feddit.uk 2 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

My mortage payment is 520€/month including interests which are tied to Euribor12 and change once a year. My interests now are less than they were a year ago.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Dorkyd68@lemmy.world 65 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

As a homeowner what weighs me down most is insurance, by a large margin. It keeps increasing while the coverage decreases. It's a huge racket in my opinion

[–] dual_sport_dork@lemmy.world 46 points 1 day ago

Racket.

A racquet is what you hit your insurance adjuster with when you're tired of his racket.

[–] credo@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] Dorkyd68@lemmy.world 7 points 23 hours ago (4 children)

Oklahoma 🙃rates go up each year due to tornados, at least that's what they say. Even though i live in a heavily populated area that'll never get hit.

I had to put a new roof on cause of softball sized hail caused by the infamous may 2013 storm that damn near leveled Moore Oklahoma. But other than that, no storm damage ever

[–] TunaLobster@lemmy.world 4 points 13 hours ago

That's what the people living in Dallas said. Then a tornado hit the middle of a dense neighborhood.

[–] Glimpythegoblin@lemm.ee 11 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

Even though i live in a heavily populated area that'll never get hit.

I don't think tornadoes care.

[–] Omegamanthethird@lemmy.world 1 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

In Arkansas we got a tornado in town. It was a huge wakeup call since people always think it won't hit where they are.

There are multiple businesses that I personally used that got wiped out by the tornado.

[–] anomnom@sh.itjust.works 1 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

Yeah I feel like Joplin proved that all wrong too.

Was the idea that tall buildings might break up wind shear that would feed the tornado?

[–] deo@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 9 hours ago

I think so. When i lived in the foothills of the Smokey Mountains, common wisom was that we didn't have to worry about tornados because of all the hills, which is basically the same idea. Then we had one touch down anyway. I think tornadoes just don't care anymore, almost like they're more energetic for some reason... like the climate has changed somehow...

[–] Twista713@lemmy.world 1 points 13 hours ago

Have you shopped other companies for rates? I switched earlier this year and cut my insurance costs by more than half! Was fucking ridiculous how it just kept climbing.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] westyvw@lemm.ee 39 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (10 children)

I am confused, my thought process went like this:

So it's more expensive to own then rent?

Unless you own it and rent it out to others?

Nobody would be a landlord if a dwelling cost more to maintain then to rent out.

So something doesn't add up.

[–] Pacattack57@lemmy.world 8 points 20 hours ago

I believe they are taking into account the cost to purchase these days since interest rates are higher, ergo high mortgage payments.

As someone else mentioned most landlords have locked in rates at this point. Not many new landlords.

[–] LengAwaits@lemmy.world 6 points 19 hours ago* (last edited 19 hours ago)

I agree, and came in here to say the same thing. I think the data is being skewed by the fact that many (not all, of course) rental properties are subdivided into multiple units (or built that way in the first place). People commenting about how it's considering modern costs, well, they must not have read the first two sentences of the article:

On paper, owning a home is almost always more expensive than renting — about 14% more, on average, after factoring in expenses like insurance, taxes, and upkeep.

But the difference has grown much more extreme in recent years as just about all homeownership costs have ballooned.

The only way you can arrive at that 14% number is if you're averaging in multi-unit apartment buildings. Very few, if any, landlords are out there subsidizing their non-family tenants by charging less than the normal costs of ownership. If most landlords are losing money year over year, well... at that point just sell the property.

[–] Not_mikey@slrpnk.net 26 points 1 day ago

Most landlords bought the place earlier when home prices and mortgage rates were lower, or they just own the place outright and don't make any mortgage payments.

This article is about choosing whether to buy at current rates or rent at current rates. If you bought a place 10 years ago for half the price it's worth now and a 2% interest rate then you're probably going to be paying less then renting

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] partial_accumen@lemmy.world 54 points 1 day ago (4 children)

On paper, owning a home is almost always more expensive than renting — about 14% more, on average, after factoring in expenses like insurance, taxes, and upkeep.

I'd be interested in seeing how they arrived at the 14% number.

When I bought my first home a couple of decades ago I moved out of my 1 bedroom apartment which I was paying a monthly rent of $700/month into a small starter home with a mortgage of $1000/month. 20 years later that exact same apartment rents for $1350/month. All of the years I lived there my house payment never rose higher than the $1000/month mortgage payment while the rent on the apartment apparently continued to increase year over year. Meanwhile I ended up selling the starter home for $110,000 than my purchase prices nearly 20 years ago.

So is their 14% number just calculated on the first month of each (renting vs buying)?

[–] Sundial@lemm.ee 31 points 1 day ago (8 children)

Once you factor in things it mentions like insurance, taxes, upkeep along with others like a down payment then it's very easy to see where the 14% numbers comes from. Frankly, I'm surprised it's only 14%. There's a lot of additional and hidden costs with home ownership.

[–] empireOfLove2@lemmy.dbzer0.com 41 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (7 children)

The difference is those "costs" are going towards buying equity that you then get to keep. Maintaining a house is expensive but it is an asset that maintains value. This article really doesn't seem to understand that which shows a very basic misunderstanding of the wealth math that goes into home ownership.

Renting may be cheaper month to month but you're literally pouring that money down a black hole never to be seen in your hands again.

Granted, building equity doesn't matter when you're already have no cash paycheck-to-paycheck for either.

[–] pearsaltchocolatebar@discuss.online 16 points 1 day ago (6 children)

No, not all of them. Insurance, property tax, and maintenance do not go to equity.

[–] qjkxbmwvz@startrek.website 10 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Not to mention mortgage interest.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[–] Sundial@lemm.ee 11 points 1 day ago

This is more of a case where the article doesn't take the time to explain the nuance. Everyone knows home ownership increases equity. Which is why it costs more.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] fishpen0@lemmy.world 12 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (5 children)

insurance

I was shocked as a homeowner to find that home insurance is not that much more expensive than renters insurance, especially for a condo where the HOA is sharing a large amount of the cost

taxes

I mean, especially if you’re already a homeowner and your assessment is years old, this amounts to less than $1k/yr.

Using the above poster’s example both of those costs annualize out to still be cheaper than rent

It’s actually horrifying how fast rent has gone up. Our mortgage in Boston went from being $1000mo more than average rent to $500mo under average rent in only two years. Even with the tax hike we just passed in my town, my total cost of ownership is far below renting even accounting for the savings we set aside for upkeep and emergencies

Plus this whole time we’ve been improving the property. We now have solar on a 0% apr loan and don’t have electricity bills anymore and the mo billing for the panels is less than our old electric bills. We also used a state program to replace all the insulation and windows at cost with another 0 apr loan. So our gas bill is now only ~$80-100 compared to the $400-500 gas bill in the shithole apartments around here with 200 year old paper insulation. And if we want we can use another state program to replace our furnace with a heat pump and lower that further.

So our relative cost went down even more as utilities keep going up and renters have zero control over their homes energy usage

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
[–] grysbok@lemmy.sdf.org 10 points 1 day ago* (last edited 12 hours ago)

For me, I'm in a condo that we bought with a 15-year mortgage during the pandemic. My mortgage (including escrow/taxes and insurance) plus HOA fees is about $2100/month. My old apartment (including monthly pet fee) was more than that when I lived there. It's currently listed for $2500/month (big complex, not necessarily my unit).

I promise all y'all I'm not spending $400/month on homeowner-specific costs. And, I could reduce my monthly cost by moving to a 30-year mortgage instead of a 15-year mortgage.

Edit: looked up my old apartment again. Holy shit, it's listed for $2750, which doesn't include a pet fee.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] callouscomic@lemm.ee 16 points 1 day ago (3 children)

This ignores the difference after 5-10 years. Rent keeps going up.

[–] bitflag@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago (5 children)

Maintenance cost and property taxes too though.

[–] seth@lemmy.world 4 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

Still cheaper to own, if you have the initial funds or loan to buy and know you won't be leaving the area for awhile. If you rent a property those maintenance and tax and insurance and interest costs associated with owning it are just passed on to you in to your rent, plus a profit margin so the owner can make money off renting it out to you. Owning the same property would cost less, over time, and not just that, but you would have something to show for it.

[–] bitflag@lemmy.world 3 points 15 hours ago (2 children)

What you forget is the cost of opportunity: the money that is stuck in a house is money that would yield income if it was invested somewhere else. Long term stock markets typically return 7%+, while rental return (or the rent you save by buying) can be anywhere from 3 to 7% depending on market, minus maintenance and other holding costs.

So there's no fast and hard guarantee that owning or renting is best - you need to run a proper simulation with the right parametres taking everything into account. In markets with low rental returns, renting is typically optimal.

[–] seth@lemmy.world 1 points 12 hours ago

Where is the money that is stuck in the house, that would hypothetically be able to be invested if not spent on the house? You have to pay to live somewhere, and if you're paying less to purchase than rent, that is money saved which is available to invest. Do you mean the up-front downpayment money needed to acquire a mortgage in the first place (typically 10-20% of the purchase cost), that could be invested in the market instead for a higher return than slowly building equity through principal payments?

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 27 points 1 day ago (14 children)

Cost of materials and demand for contractors. Even if you DIY it, everything is 3x as expensive as it was before covid. The price of lumber never really went back to where it was before covid. Its clearly price gouging.

load more comments (14 replies)
[–] eran_morad@lemmy.world 15 points 1 day ago

We livin in a new gilded age, bruh.

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›