this post was submitted on 21 Nov 2024
448 points (99.6% liked)

Technology

59549 readers
3192 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
(page 2) 33 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old

Step 1: Buy Chome

Step 2: End development

Step 3: ???

Step 4: ~~Profit?~~ Non-Profit Firefox?

[–] rockSlayer@lemmy.world 32 points 12 hours ago (2 children)

They should force it to become a worker cooperative. It's the only solution that doesn't allow for corruption

[–] Grimy@lemmy.world 6 points 10 hours ago (2 children)
[–] bdonvr@thelemmy.club 2 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

For a lot of things yes.

However I do not want to use a browser developed by the US gov tyvm

[–] Grimy@lemmy.world 1 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago)

My comment is more in line with the corruption aspect. As much as I think they deserve it, giving it to the employees would be more akin to them winning the lottery. In the space of a year, they will have gone public, shareholders would have stormed in and we would be at square one.

Nationalisation at least has a chance of getting rid of the money corruption aspect. Sadly, the three letter agencies are probably deep in every browser already so I don't think any solution takes care of that.

I understand your point though. Personally, I will never use chrome no matter what happens, ha.

[–] Kecessa@sh.itjust.works 3 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

Yep, nationalize everything that's essential or at least offer a nationalized alternative and let the private sector try to compete.

[–] Grimy@lemmy.world 2 points 6 hours ago

I literally salivate at the thought of it happening to the telecom industries.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] sorghum@sh.itjust.works 17 points 12 hours ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] BroBot9000@lemmy.world 12 points 12 hours ago

ABOUT FUCKING TIME!

[–] PerogiBoi@lemmy.ca 7 points 11 hours ago

Big doubt anything actually happens.

[–] 52fighters@lemmy.sdf.org 5 points 10 hours ago

The Reuters article suggests prohibiting payments to Apple so that Chrome users on their hardware default to Google search. What about default settings to Firefox? Similar agreements finance a large portion of Mozilla's revenue.

[–] Tetsuo@jlai.lu 7 points 12 hours ago (2 children)

Is the DOJ the only working system in the US now?

[–] kibiz0r@midwest.social 1 points 8 hours ago

FTC works. For now.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] raynethackery@lemmy.world 1 points 7 hours ago

Yeah, see all this stuff happening between now and inauguration day. See, we did something. Too little, too late. If there are ever free and fair elections in this country, and the Democrats return to power, they better get their fucking shit together. The dismantling of the Federal government will be almost impossible to reverse.

[–] FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world 2 points 10 hours ago

Admittedly, I don't know enough about monopolies and antitrust laws to know how much this matters. Can someone ELI5 this and give us more info?

[–] ElectroLisa@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago) (1 children)

>sell Chrome to open search monopoly

>Chrome isn't a search engine but a web browser

[–] net00@lemm.ee 6 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

Yeah, Google pays other companies lots of money to have its search engine enabled by default. That's what the lawsuit argued, so I'm not sure how separating chrome from the company will change that...

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world -1 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

What the what?

"sell your browser, that'll limit your search monopoly"

. . . HAH?

[–] asdfasdfasdf@lemmy.world 5 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

It has 67% market share, and the default search is Google.

[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 1 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

So it is on firefox as well . . ? And also with Edge, for those poor bastards.

Why not just force them to pick a different default? Or something meaningful like splitting them out of Alphabet entirely? Or stop sucking? Okay, well that last one may be hard to administrate.

[–] asdfasdfasdf@lemmy.world 1 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

It is on FF and Edge because Google pays them a ton of money. Every person who chooses Chrome instead of FF is more money for Google because they don't need to pay themselves to make Google the default.

[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 1 points 6 hours ago

A fair point, though "a ton of money" is essentially 1% of their net profits for the year. Selling Chrome to someone who gets another .5% is not going to do anything at all.

[–] Showroom7561@lemmy.ca -3 points 9 hours ago (2 children)

What does Chrome have to do with search? 🤔

[–] themoonisacheese@sh.itjust.works 3 points 8 hours ago (3 children)

Google is the default search engine for chrome, and chrome is the single most popular browser at about 95% market share.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] TheGrandNagus@lemmy.world 0 points 8 hours ago

What search engine does Chrome, by far and away the most used browser be it on phone or PC, use?

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›