this post was submitted on 30 Nov 2024
1783 points (99.3% liked)

Microblog Memes

5931 readers
2941 users here now

A place to share screenshots of Microblog posts, whether from Mastodon, tumblr, ~~Twitter~~ X, KBin, Threads or elsewhere.

Created as an evolution of White People Twitter and other tweet-capture subreddits.

Rules:

  1. Please put at least one word relevant to the post in the post title.
  2. Be nice.
  3. No advertising, brand promotion or guerilla marketing.
  4. Posters are encouraged to link to the toot or tweet etc in the description of posts.

Related communities:

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] robocall@lemmy.world 13 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I had an employer do this to me. I requested to use most of my two weeks vacation time in one vacation. They declined it, telling me that it should be used for 3 and 4 day weekend trips on occasion, and not all at once. Then they were shocked that I didn't cancel my vacation.

[–] PieMePlenty@lemmy.world 5 points 2 days ago

Damn. Where Im at, there is a law requiring businesses allow two weeks back to back vacation each year.

[–] nroth@lemmy.world 24 points 3 days ago

Sad. Reads like they needed a warm body but it didn't much matter who

[–] Toneswirly@lemmy.world 14 points 3 days ago (3 children)

lol there's no way the poster actually fired anyone. If there's one thing I've learned its that most business don't like to fire people, its too expensive. They just talk a big game, do write-ups and generally try to use passive-aggression to present an air of "you're on thin ice!" Odds are, if your employer needs you THAT badly to work your shifts, they're not gonna want to train an all new person to replace you.

[–] echodot@feddit.uk 1 points 2 days ago

The company I work for decided one day that we absolutely had to use a script when talking to customers. I don't, I just ignored them because we didn't used to have to have a script so why is it suddenly requirement now.

Every time they hear you not using the script they write you up, which essentially just amounts to them writing down this person is not doing what I want. Signing it and making you sign it as if that's some kind of contract you've entered into and then nothing happens.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] LovableSidekick@lemmy.world 25 points 3 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (3 children)

Can somebody explain "y'all can front if y'all want"?

edit: thanks for the replies. The differences in interpretations make me wonder why people don't just say "bluff" or "challenge me" or whatever the boss actually did mean to say. It seems like inventing slang has really accelerated in the last say 20 years. I hear so many more slang terms now. It's like everybody wants to make up their own language. Seems like non-inclusive behavior to me.

[–] KomfortablesKissen@discuss.tchncs.de 32 points 3 days ago (1 children)

"Rebell at your own demise"

To front someone is to face them, to challenge them. This basically said "you challenge me to fire you? Challenge accepted."

[–] msage@programming.dev 17 points 3 days ago (1 children)

I thought it was about 'putting up a front', trying to act tough without expecting blowback.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] richieadler@lemmy.myserv.one 10 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Apparently the work needs slaves.

[–] frayedpickles@lemmy.cafe 2 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Being denied PTO on a specific day and slavery are not the same. Source: California just voted to continue enslaving people, PTO was not brought up.

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›