this post was submitted on 18 Dec 2024
561 points (97.0% liked)

Science Memes

11426 readers
2451 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.



Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
(page 2) 46 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Neuromancer49@midwest.social 7 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Don't sell yourself short. It's a salty lump of fat.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Masta_Chief@lemmy.world 6 points 4 days ago

This gets explored a bit in The Talos Principle and it's sequal. Working on the 2nd one now, it's been fun

[–] marcos@lemmy.world 7 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

There's a lot of water and ions (IONS!) besides that lump of fat.

[–] Wizzard@lemm.ee 2 points 3 days ago

Speak for yourself. I try not to think.

[–] HawlSera@lemm.ee 3 points 3 days ago

I'm still rooting for Idealism or the immortal soul to somehow be a thing.

Go Banana!

[–] Kwakigra@beehaw.org 5 points 4 days ago

I've never understood why people think the most sophisticated and complex technology humans have ever been aware of is too mundane just because we have scratched the surface of understanding it.

[–] henfredemars@infosec.pub 3 points 4 days ago

It’s OK. Consciousness is but a brief anomaly in the vast sea of time.

[–] roguetrick@lemmy.world 1 points 3 days ago

Action potential doesn't do thinking. Thinking happens at neuron junctions and that shits chemical and analogue. The electrical part just moves the data to the next synapse. There are some gap junctions but those aren't really associated with thinking.

[–] SomeAmateur@sh.itjust.works 1 points 4 days ago
[–] kibiz0r@midwest.social 0 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

If by consciousness, you just mean thinking, then sure.

But if you mean awareness — “phenomena”, if you prefer — then I don’t see why an experiential state would (or could) be entirely secondary to a physical state.

It is, after all, possible for me to write words and perform other physical actions based on my experiential state. In many ways, my mental world is more “real” than the physical world.

For what it’s worth, I don’t think rejecting physicalism necessarily requires embracing the idea of a soul. I’m an atheist, and a neutral monist, for example. But if I had to choose between only physicalism and idealism, idealism makes more sense. Before anything else, I’m conscious.

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›