this post was submitted on 21 Dec 2024
19 points (56.8% liked)

Antiwork

3750 readers
985 users here now

A community for those who want to end work, are curious about ending work, want to get the most out of a work-free life, want more information on anti-work ideas and want personal help with their own jobs/work-related struggles.

The new place for c/antiwork@lemmy.fmhy.ml

This server is no longer working, and we had to move.

Active stats from all instances

Subscribers: 2.1k

Date Created: June 21, 2023

Library copied from reddit:
The Anti-Work Library 📚
Essential Reads

Start here! These are probably the most talked-about essays on the topic.

c/Antiwork Rules

Tap or click to expand

1. Server Main Rules

The main rules of the server will be enforced stringently. https://lemmy.world/

2. No spam or reposts + limit off topic comments

Spamming posts will be removed. Reposts will be removed with the exception of a repost becoming the main hub for discussion on that topic.

Off topic comments that do not pertain to the post at hand may be removed if it is deemed they contribute nothing and/or foster hostility at users. This mostly applies to political and religious debate, but can be applied to other things at the mod’s discretion.

3. Post must have Antiwork/ Work Reform explicitly involved

Post must have Antiwork/Work Reform explicitly involved in some capacity. This can be talking about antiwork, work reform, laws, and ext.

4. Educate don’t attack

No mocking, demeaning, flamebaiting, purposeful antagonizing, trolling, hateful language, false accusation or allegation, or backseat moderating is allowed. Don’t resort to ad hominem attacks against another user or insult other people, examples of violations would be going after the person rather than the stance they take.

If we feel the comment is uncalled for we will remove it. Stay civil and there won’t be problems.

5. No Advertising

Under no circumstance are you allowed to promote or advertise any product or service

6. No factually misleading informationContent that makes claims or implications that can be proven false or misleading will be removed.

7. Headlines

If the title of the post isn’t an original title of the article then the first thing in the body of the post should be an original title written in this format “Original title: {title here}”.

8. Staff Discretion

Staff can take disciplinary action on offenses not listed in the rules when a community member's actions or general conduct creates a negative experience for another player and/or the community.

It is impossible to list every example or variation of the rules. It is also impossible to word everything perfectly. Players are expected to understand the intent of the rules and not attempt to "toe the line" or use loopholes to get around the intent of the rule.


Other Communities

c/workreform@lemmy.world


Server status for big servers http://lemmy-status.org/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

There are 3 manifestos circulating. One is definitely fake as it was written by someone with an average intellect at best. It goes on to reference the Ridley Scott film “Gladiator” and is rife with spelling and grammatical errors. The second one that police released to the media with instructions not to publish it starts off boot licking cops saying “(to the feds) I appreciate what you do for our country” and the one i believe to be the legitimate Manifesto is on his personal website which shares his twitter handle. People have attempted to discredit this one by saying the metadata says it was created December ninth, however this does not add up. Firstly when you type the URL into the website age checker it says it was created sometime in july 2023. Secondly if you search the link in google you will see it is timestamped December 3rd. The day before the shooting. It is hosted in Rekyjavik Iceland on an encrypted .WHOIS server. However this is not all that leads me to believe it is legitimate.

Next if you examine the main page of the website you will see there are 2 posts as well as links to Mangione’s twitter, Github, LinkedIn and email address. Also the 2 links are tech projects he worked on. One is an AI project and the other is a robotics engineering project where he created a robot that mimics his own movements. This post has 3 pictures/.gifs of him controlling the device through his movements. These images are not located anywhere else online.

Next i analyzed the manifesto on this site and there are zero grammatical or spelling errors. I then had chat gpt do some analysis of the document. Firstly I asked if it appeared to be written by a person or an AI and it unequivocally answered that it is human generated. Next i had it assess the level of intellect and schooling as well as the age of the writer. It said the writer appears to be between the age of 30-50 but a high level of prestigious schooling could mean that the writer is indeed younger.

Now I remembered seeing someone post a twitter link to a paper mangione wrote about Christianity and the roman empire. So i pulled this up entered it into chat gpt and had it run an analysis on both. I then asked what the likelihood that both of these documents were written by the dame author and chat gpt said it was very likely especially if the manifesto was written years after the first allowing the writers skill level to increase. I have the chat gpt conversation screen shots if people would like me to post them or have any other ideas as to how this manifesto could be further analyzed.

But the manifesto that I believe to be the real deal is located at www dot pepmangione dot com backslash manifesto. I would link it but it seems the entire internet is on damage control for billionaires to scrub as much pro mangione content as they possibly can. Ive had YouTube comments shadow hidden and removed for just spelling out this link as I’ve done above

I used to be on reddit but luckily for me i didnt have to deal with tje insane censorship resulting from this phenomenon. However i had to deal with it 6-7 months ago when i was perma-IP banned for pointing out that international law states indigenous populations have a right ro defend themselves by any means necessary including the big V word. Now ive seen more than half a dozen Luigi Mangione Reddit subs wiped from existence in the last 10 days. Ive seen posts on photoshop battles nuked. Ive seen a sub with users who are flared as uhc corporate affiliated spreading ridiculous propaganda that was then parroted bu CNN 2 days later (brian Thompson is the new george floyd and other ridiculous shit) this sub is r/fuckluigimangione it reads like satire but their automod is ready to state otherwise anytime anyone asks if it is satirical.

We are living in a blatantly fascist plutocratic oligarchy.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] DougHolland@lemmy.world 5 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

Anybody could be wrong about anything, but Ken Klippenstien has a track record of being right. You have a two-day-old account on Lemmy, and an unwarranted reliance on ChatGPT.

[–] exploitedamerican@lemm.ee 2 points 16 hours ago

I used to have a 2 year old account with a bunch if meaningless karma on reddit but those basrards IP banned me 6 months ago for a comment that said international law states indigenous populations have a right to defend themselves from occupation by any means.

I might be wrong, but my gut tells me something smells fishy and only one of these documents sounds like it was written by an ivy league cum laude graduate. ill admit I put too much stock into irrelevant factors. However my gut is still pulling me towards believing this other manifesto seems more believable.

And its not that i don't think Klippenstien is a good reporter or that he’s not trustworthy. Its that i think cops and the reporters working for legacy media are both extremely untrustworthy. I guess only time will tell and if I’m wrong ill eat my words.

[–] missingno@fedia.io 94 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I then had chat gpt do some analysis of the document.

This kind of analysis is worse than useless, and if this is what you're basing your claim on... I'll trust Klippenstein over you.

[–] chaogomu@lemmy.world 29 points 1 day ago

The whois info is pretty trustworthy, but yeah the chatgpt shit is just modern dowsing.

[–] Earflap@reddthat.com 40 points 1 day ago

ChatGPT doesnt know shit about fuck. NEXT!

[–] bdonvr@thelemmy.club 78 points 1 day ago (13 children)

The entire section where you interacted with ChatGPT is completely and utterly useless. Every bit of it.

load more comments (13 replies)
[–] hperrin@lemmy.ca 56 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

As a decades experienced web engineer, I’d like to know, what is an encrypted .WHOIS server? In all of my time, I’ve never seen those words put together in that order.

I think what you’re trying to say is that the WHOIS data associated with the domain is from a privacy service, not an actual person. You can pretty clearly see in that data that the domain was registered on Dec 9th of this year, and that part can’t be faked (at least, it can only be faked by the registrar, and I don’t think NameCheap Inc is in on it). So unless he set this domain up right before they arrested him, no, this is not his domain.

The IP address in the A record for that domain belongs to Amazon Inc, and is located in San Jose, CA. That pretty much shows that it’s running on an AWS machine. So yeah, literally anyone with some basic web knowledge could have set that up in a few minutes.

As even further evidence that it wasn’t him, the Wayback Machine only shows snapshots of that domain since Dec 9, 2024, the day the domain was registered. And the page changes between the night of the ninth, and the morning of the tenth, while he was in custody.

[–] exploitedamerican@lemm.ee 2 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Thanks for your input. I do not have an expert grasp of coding or programming.

Is there no possibility one could have set this domain up to release after being arrested either by oneself or with a participating party?

[–] bane_killgrind@slrpnk.net 9 points 1 day ago (1 children)

That would be a stupid way to do it. Setting up the infrastructure can happen months before any content is visible.

Hyperrins explanation points to the idea that someone was actively setting this up when the news of the arrest dropped.

If it was set up beforehand, the content would be available on the first snapshot or there would be blank Wayback entries for more than only a few hours.

[–] exploitedamerican@lemm.ee 0 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Whats the most possible scenario for someone having a message website release after suddenly becoming indefinitely or permanently indisposed?

[–] bane_killgrind@slrpnk.net 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)

This concept is called https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dead_man%27s_switch and the implementation is the service is set up, and periodically checks some criteria. If the criteria is not met, the payload is sent.

The criteria could be, some device does not sync for a certain amount of time, a series on of numbers isn't entered into the bunker console after a timer runs on, a building floods and sets off a sensor, whatever you want. Could be GPS location on your phone doesn't leave home on a workday. Anything.

The payload also varies. A message or vault of files is sent to someone specific, or made public on the web. The payload could be an automated incendiary if you are nuts. Probably people just delete their browser history.

This is a piece of infrastructure. There would be some evidence of things being set up before he topped the fucker.

[–] exploitedamerican@lemm.ee -1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Did you just reference lost?

Idk why j didn't just say dead man switch. Momentary brain fart

If the dead man switch went to another party who was given the code in advance then was instructed to pay for the site and have it posted what evidence would there be?

[–] bane_killgrind@slrpnk.net 3 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Yes lost

Also co-conspirators? There would be evidence of communications or something. There might be conspirators that haven't been uncovered yet, who knows.

Edit The criteria could be a buddy sees stuff on the news and then does all this, it's just unlikely, being unreliable, and apparently this dude cut everyone out of his life. He might have some clandestine messaging to a specific person but that's incredibly risky.

[–] exploitedamerican@lemm.ee 0 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Well if hes as smart as he should be he would have figured out how to use pgp end to end encryption. If he did in fact have evidence on him he probably wanted to be caught and take responsibility for what he did. But no use supplying them with more evidence than they need. And also j think they are posturing with what evidence they say they have. The barrel of tje gun was a glock and glocks have polygonal rifling in the barrell which is impossible to get any reliable ballistics evidence from.

Itll be interesting to watch this case unfold and see where it goes if the general public will even be allowed to spectate given the terrorism enhancement

[–] grue@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Well if hes as smart as he should be he would have figured out how to use pgp end to end encryption.

The real shame here is that he apparently didn't figure out to use PGP signing in order to release a manifesto that could be cryptographically proven to be authentic.

[–] exploitedamerican@lemm.ee 1 points 1 day ago

That would have been neat

[–] bane_killgrind@slrpnk.net 1 points 1 day ago

If. How many individual technical skills does one or two people need to have?

[–] hperrin@lemmy.ca 7 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I can’t say there’s no possibility, but the probability is incredibly low. The domain was registered on the day he was arrested, likely after he was arrested, because the first Wayback snapshot is at 2:47 PM EST and the page is blank. Meaning, a web server had been set up to respond to requests, but no content had been added, so it just responded with an empty body. The first snapshot with content was taken two hours later at 4:28 PM EST.

The rat that ratted him out called 911 shortly after 9 AM, which means he was in custody during this time.

The story had just started to spread by the early afternoon, so whoever registered the domain could have done so after learning his name from the news. (Utah Dispatch posted the story at 12:39 PM.)

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Telorand@reddthat.com 14 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Why does this matter, though? His manifesto was written on the bullet casings. Whether we have The True Manifesto™ is not really relevant, because what he stands for is an idea, and trying to turn our just anger into some kind of purity cult or religion will only burden that idea with unnecessary baggage.

[–] exploitedamerican@lemm.ee 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

People just want to know more about him.

But i appreciate your answer. It is Based Af

[–] Telorand@reddthat.com 2 points 1 day ago

As long as people don't lose sight of the forest for the trees, I'm down with learning! I just know that there's a concerted effort by the media establishment to obfuscate and distract from what he represents.

[–] Nougat@fedia.io 18 points 1 day ago (5 children)

Why would someone who wrote the /manifesto page have such a shit website? Far more likely that someone registered the domain on 12/09/2024 like the whois says, made this front page out of what little shit they could get their hands on, and then buried their own text at /manifesto.

And ... do people who write manifestos call them "manifesto"?

I'd believe Klippenstein over this anonymous copypasta.

[–] mkwt@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago

I haven't actually looked at this website, but there's a long history of programmer types making the most basic personal websites they can with unformatted, plain HTML and the like.

Consider, for example, the Agile Manifesto. It's kinda important for the history of software engineering, but just try to read it on top of that tiled background.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Oka@sopuli.xyz 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] exploitedamerican@lemm.ee 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Indeed. But i am curious, are you questioning the info on websiteage.org, the google timestamp or the December 9th date people are using to write it off as fake?

[–] ivn@jlai.lu 5 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (4 children)

https://websiteage.org/

How Do We Detect Website Age?

[…] it fetches the webpage in the given url, and then scans through the HTML markup and content, to find indicators of the site age.

It seems that it would be easy to throw websiteage.org way off.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] seathru@lemmy.sdf.org 2 points 1 day ago (3 children)

I dunno. The weird AI art that disappears on the 10th is kinda sus.

Source: https://web.archive.org/web/*/https://pepmangione.com/manifesto/

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Seasm0ke@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago (9 children)

Post the info on the original timestamp being DEC 3. The DEC9 posting was the most convincing i agree but the dates were enough to cast doubt. Very likely they are calling his arrest statement a manifesto to muddy the waters, but I havent much confidence in that breloom signed substack due to the modified date.

load more comments (9 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›