this post was submitted on 06 Jan 2025
775 points (100.0% liked)

TechTakes

1532 readers
90 users here now

Big brain tech dude got yet another clueless take over at HackerNews etc? Here's the place to vent. Orange site, VC foolishness, all welcome.

This is not debate club. Unless it’s amusing debate.

For actually-good tech, you want our NotAwfulTech community

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] thedeadwalking4242@lemmy.world 41 points 3 days ago (5 children)

Why is same personally picking subscription prices anyway? Should there be some accountant doing that math? Wtf

[–] pufferfischerpulver@feddit.org 22 points 3 days ago

This was my biggest takeaway here. Wtf?! "I personally set the price and thought we would make some money"?! Either he is trying to sound cool by being casual or he is a fucking idiot. Or probably both.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] neidu3@sh.itjust.works 37 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (2 children)

I cancelled a 20$ subscription I started because it was arguably useful for me and served exactly one use-case. Now I don't need it anymore.

Of course, they had a form asking feedback/why. I chose "ChatGapT is nott advanced enough" as that was one of the alternatives. Hopefully it will lead to them putting more resources into development and burn through investor money faster.

"Trust me bro, just 200m dollars more"

  • Sam Altman, probably
[–] Birch@sh.itjust.works 29 points 3 days ago

Just one more datacenter bro, just one more (that consumes the same power as Belgium.)

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Mikina@programming.dev 45 points 3 days ago (2 children)

Hmm, we should get together some funds to buy a single unlimited subscription, and then let it continuously generate as large and complex prompts as the rate limitting allows.

[–] apotheotic@beehaw.org 41 points 3 days ago (2 children)

On one hand, heck yes. On the other, part of the reason its so expensive is because of the energy and water usage, so sticking it to the man in this way also is harmful to the environment :(

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Honytawk@lemmy.zip 29 points 3 days ago (1 children)

If they are losing money on $200/month, that does not necessarily mean they lose money on the $20/month.

One is unlimited, the other is not. You only have to use the $200 subscription more than 10 times the amount the $20 subscription allows for OpenAI to earn less on that subscription.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] jacksilver@lemmy.world 32 points 3 days ago (4 children)

This is something I've been speculating for a while. The cost of running these complex systems (as OpenAI models aren't just LLMs) is subsidized so heavily that we don't really know the cost of running these things.

This is a huge risk to any business, as the price for these services has to go up significantly in the long term.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›