this post was submitted on 06 Jan 2025
154 points (82.6% liked)

science

15103 readers
169 users here now

A community to post scientific articles, news, and civil discussion.

rule #1: be kind

<--- rules currently under construction, see current pinned post.

2024-11-11

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The study, conducted by Dr Demid Getik, explores how mental health is related to income make-up within couples by examining the link between annual income rises for women and the number of clinical mental health diagnoses over a set period of time.

The study finds that as more women take on the breadwinner role in the household, the number of mental health related incidences also increases.

As wives begin earning more than their husbands, the probability of receiving a mental health diagnosis increases by as much as 8% for all those observed in the study, but by as much as 11% for the men.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Maggoty@lemmy.world 47 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Oh for fucks sake. No wonder this study is ridiculous. It's an economist trying to make inferences on mental health. The only actual data he had is a correlation in mental health diagnoses and women earning significantly* more. (Number not defined)

He has no evidence for causation. He does no work to get rid of confounding factors like toxic masculinity's famous dislike of therapy. He just sees a rise in the pure number of diagnoses and says women earning more is bad for the mental health of both people in a marriage. He doesn't even bother to check what the diagnoses are, or look for any kind of severity. For all we know the finding here could be that women who earn more and men who are willing to be with them seek counseling earlier than couples where the man makes more.

This is shit science.

Yep. The guy got a large publicly available dataset (or one his university had access to) and mined it for interesting results to get a publication.

[–] fnrir@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

[Translation: Correlation does not equal causation.]

[–] xorollo@leminal.space 28 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Perhaps households where women earn more money are also made of people where the male partner feels more comfortable seeking mental health resources. Or perhaps they have better insurance and can afford it.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 11 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I would suggest that "Wives earning more than husbands" isn't the issue so much as "Cost of living is outpacing household earnings and men have been conditioned through generations of patriarchy to believe this is a personal failing rather than a broad economic shift".

If your wife is bringing in seven figures, I doubt the husband will lose much sleep. But if you're looking at a $30k paycheck to your wife's $40k paycheck, and you both acknowledge the total isn't enough to live on, there's a lot of anxiety to go around in that situation.

[–] xorollo@leminal.space 3 points 1 day ago

Agreed. I don't think it's about wives earning more than their husbands at all.

[–] uriel238@lemmy.blahaj.zone 49 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Yes, the link is this:

When all the adults in the household have to work 40+ hours a week, plus commute, plus all the adulting...they get sad since this is fucking toxic.

Also no one has time for civics.

Also no one has time to parent, so the kids are sad too.

If we're looking at mental health problems, lets look here first.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] jpreston2005@lemmy.world 15 points 2 days ago (3 children)

Was talking to a cute girl at a New Years Eve party, and it came out that while I made a nice amount for doing very little work, she made even more but had to do a lot of work. I went straight to daydreaming about being a stay-at-home Dad so hard I almost fell off my chair.

Dudes, more money means more money, why on earth would having more money upset you???

[–] Maggoty@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

I'm willing to bet it's selection bias. They have more time for therapy and openness to the idea. It's one of those studies that just looks at the numbers at the top of everything. X couples got divorced, Y people sought counseling, etc.

The most they can say is there's an increased correlation in seeking mental help.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] blazeknave@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago

Please Lord let me find a woman that makes the same as me and I'll happily retire a Pinterest mom and support her career. I love my kid, my home, my time, my flexibility, optimizing systems with cart blanche..

[–] neidu3@sh.itjust.works 188 points 3 days ago (2 children)

Any chance this correlates with finally being able to afford mental health care?

[–] Sibbo@sopuli.xyz 68 points 3 days ago (1 children)

This guy understands how the world works.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] baronvonj@lemmy.world 23 points 2 days ago (3 children)

The study focused on heterosexual Swedish couples of working age who married in 2001 and whose individual incomes measured at just above or just below the equal earnings threshold.

I wouldn't have thought mental health care was inaccessible due to cost in a country like Sweden.

[–] neidu3@sh.itjust.works 45 points 2 days ago (1 children)

It's not always free in scandinavialand. If you have a referral from a doctor due to a mental illness or the like, it's probably covered. But if you seek therapy out if own initiative you probably have to pay out of pocket.

Source: As a scandinavian I looked into it once, but upon noticing the hourly rate I figured that it would probably cause more mental distress than it would solve.

load more comments (1 replies)

It's not free, but it's not expensive either, max of around $250 a year for all healthcare. But mental health care in Sweden is abysmal, if you're lucky they'll give you 12 sessions with a psychologist who is apathetic to your issues and then let you go, because they seem to see it as something that once your sessions are done, should be fixed.

This in a country rife with social isolation, months of dark and cold, hobbies that are too expensive to do and a generally unhealthy society.

[–] catloaf@lemm.ee 22 points 2 days ago (5 children)

It's not just monetary, it's also time, and being willing to admit you have a problem and seek help. Some jobs will fire you if you admit to having substance abuse or mental health problems, like airline pilots. (Or even if they don't outright fire you, it'll still end your career.)

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] baronvonj@lemmy.world 124 points 3 days ago (32 children)

Society needs to normalize households women being successful.

An image with the text "Date: Would you ever become a house husband if I made over $250k/year?" answered by "Me:"  with a picture of Sponge Bob wearing a French maid outfit and carrying a drink on a tray

[–] TheAlbatross@lemmy.blahaj.zone 53 points 3 days ago (4 children)

I wanna be a house husband so bad yo I'd be so good at it I can cook and clean good enough to please anyone's grandma and I can manage a household like a pro

Lemme stop working lemme decorate a fucking great room and meal prep for my loved ones FUCK

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] neon_nova@lemmy.dbzer0.com 9 points 2 days ago (1 children)

My only problem with this personally is what if something terrible happens and the wife is no longer in the picture. Then, my house husband skills wouldn’t help me land a decent paying job.

[–] sexual_tomato@lemmy.dbzer0.com 19 points 2 days ago

Welcome to the reality of every stay at home mom ever

load more comments (30 replies)
[–] LaunchesKayaks@lemmy.world 38 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

I've experienced a man in my life being really fucking salty and super dickish about my successful career. It isn't a husband or SO, but my stepfather. The man who, until recently, has been a great father figure.

I can't talk about work around him without his mood immediately souring. Idk if he's jealous that I have some disposable income and that I am making a little less than he is and I'm only 3 years into my career as opposed to his 25, but it's really discouraging.

Finances are very tight for him and my mother and it's almost entirely his fault because he is terrible with money. It's really sad to see him act this way. According to my mom, he has bitched to my grandma (his mom) about me taking up horseback riding and doing things with my new friends because it can be expensive. My grandma yelled at him over it and said that me doing new things and socializing is very good and she supports it. Idk why he thinks my finances are his business either. Ugh. The man is so frustrating.

Sorry for ranting. Guess I really needed to get all that out lol.

[–] baronvonj@lemmy.world 11 points 2 days ago

Well I hope there was some catharsis to your comment! That sucks you're being subjected to it. Good for grandma having your back!

[–] Thistlewick@lemmynsfw.com 54 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Why is there an increase in mental health diagnoses recently?

Looks around at the state of the world. Tyranny on the rise; human right being violated across the globe; climate crisis set to boil humanity alive; tech companies funding dictators.

My hypothesis is that it is the fault of women.

[–] GregorGizeh@lemmy.zip 10 points 2 days ago

It certainly doesn't help that men and women are more adversarial than they have ever been. The cause may be just, but at the end of the day everyone is just lonely and miserable, and afraid of the other.

[–] circuitfarmer@lemmy.sdf.org 32 points 2 days ago (3 children)

This is really sad, tbh.

I personally would be freaking stoked. Would love to be a stay at home hubs, too.

[–] Shou@lemmy.world 8 points 2 days ago

It's genuinely upsetting. The option to be a house wife/husband is becoming rarer. Everyone needs to work to provide enough for the household. House hubbies are lucky men.

[–] BranBucket@lemmy.world 5 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Dude, me too, and I would kill at it.

Sadly, based on skills and the job market where we're at, I can make more working.

[–] greenhorn@lemm.ee 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Same. My skillset and interests align with being a house spouse, not making money. Single tho, and trying to make a beautiful home while working full time leads to many compromises

[–] BranBucket@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

That's what we found out.

My wife enjoys her work, finds it rewarding, etc. etc. and has never been really content as a homemaker. My job is alright, but I don't feel any real passion for it, and I don't need a work atmosphere or to be around a lot of people to stay engaged. I'm happy just keeping things organized and running smoothly in my own little corner of the world.

I make just a little less than we need for her to stay home, and she makes peanuts in comparison.

It really hacks me off. She works in education, what she does is far more important to the well-being of society than what I do. If our paychecks were reversed, and they honestly should be reversed, I'd be happy to stay home or work part time but it's just not financially feasible.

[–] HubertManne@moist.catsweat.com 11 points 2 days ago

oh yeah but I would not want that much pressure on my wife. Would want to make enough to at least get us by in a pinch.

[–] AmazingAwesomator@lemmy.world 39 points 2 days ago (2 children)

i want my wife to earn more than me; she sure deserves it. she has a higher education and a job that actually matters to humanity. i have a desk job that makes computers go beep. its absurd how low her pay is :(

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] catloaf@lemm.ee 43 points 3 days ago (5 children)

For men, mental health issues that arose as female earnings increased were more likely to be related to substance-related concerns, whereas women were more likely to experience neurotic and stress-related disorders.

I'm not convinced of a causative relationship here (well, at least for the men, it makes sense that working more increases stress on the women's side). It's possible that the woman became the higher earner because of the man's existing substance abuse problem, and/or that the woman becoming a higher earner allowed the man to seek help for the problem.

It's also possible that the substance abuse problem developed after the woman became the higher earner, though I'm not sure why that would happen.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] LodeMike@lemmy.today 22 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Remember, this is diagnoses. My guess is that its a "owning a horse make you healthier" thing again.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] partial_accumen@lemmy.world 16 points 2 days ago (6 children)

Men that are upset that their wives out-earn them are missing the point of marriage. The point of marriage isn't him vs her, its the two of you together against the world. If she is earning more than him, then that benefits him too because he's part of the marriage.

I'm constantly astonished when I hear of men that are upset by their wives out-earning them. Some of these men have even sabotaged their wife's work or changed the circumstances at home preventing her from continuing in the job where she out-earns him. My only hope for these women is they realize their husband's love is conditional on him being dominant over her, and that she seeks out a better future where she can be her best self.

load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›