this post was submitted on 08 Jan 2025
267 points (96.8% liked)

Ask Lemmy

27401 readers
1208 users here now

A Fediverse community for open-ended, thought provoking questions


Rules: (interactive)


1) Be nice and; have funDoxxing, trolling, sealioning, racism, and toxicity are not welcomed in AskLemmy. Remember what your mother said: if you can't say something nice, don't say anything at all. In addition, the site-wide Lemmy.world terms of service also apply here. Please familiarize yourself with them


2) All posts must end with a '?'This is sort of like Jeopardy. Please phrase all post titles in the form of a proper question ending with ?


3) No spamPlease do not flood the community with nonsense. Actual suspected spammers will be banned on site. No astroturfing.


4) NSFW is okay, within reasonJust remember to tag posts with either a content warning or a [NSFW] tag. Overtly sexual posts are not allowed, please direct them to either !asklemmyafterdark@lemmy.world or !asklemmynsfw@lemmynsfw.com. NSFW comments should be restricted to posts tagged [NSFW].


5) This is not a support community.
It is not a place for 'how do I?', type questions. If you have any questions regarding the site itself or would like to report a community, please direct them to Lemmy.world Support or email info@lemmy.world. For other questions check our partnered communities list, or use the search function.


6) No US Politics.
Please don't post about current US Politics. If you need to do this, try !politicaldiscussion@lemmy.world or !askusa@discuss.online


Reminder: The terms of service apply here too.

Partnered Communities:

Tech Support

No Stupid Questions

You Should Know

Reddit

Jokes

Ask Ouija


Logo design credit goes to: tubbadu


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Charlie_Hebdo_shooting

This is a sensitive topic for some people, so please do your best to have civil discussions. Let's do better than the average social media.

(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Adderbox76@lemmy.ca 28 points 2 days ago (1 children)

As in everything in life, your right to swing your fist ends where my nose begins.

If you don't like the satire of Charlie Hebdo, your right is to not read it. If you don't like a comedian who makes pedo jokes, your right is to not buy their tickets. If you don't like a TV show that shows drug use, your right is to not watch it.

That's it. That's the end of your personal rights on that issue. You do NOT have the right to tell other people what they personally view, watch, read, etc...

If enough people share your view, that publication/comedian/show will either change or go out of business naturally because of lack of subscribers. That's how it works.

I personally find Charlie Hebdo to be racist twits. But that doesn't give me any right to kill them. I have the right to just ignore them.

[–] oce@jlai.lu 9 points 2 days ago (5 children)

What makes you think Charlie Hebdo is racist?

[–] Adderbox76@lemmy.ca 11 points 2 days ago (1 children)

"Racist" is probably too strong a word, you're right.

I think "Tasteless" is more fitting. Racist would imply that they "satirise" some groups while protecting others, while Charlie Hebdo paints everyone with the same tasteless brush.

[–] NOT_RICK@lemmy.world 9 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Reminds me of something my coworker was telling me about Leah Michele from the show Glee. A black cast mate accused her of being racist and the the rest of the cast essentially said “nah, she’s a total bitch to pretty much everyone”

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] hanrahan@slrpnk.net 67 points 2 days ago (18 children)

It was depressing that every newspaper in the developed world didn't print the cartoon :(

[–] Valmond@lemmy.world 18 points 2 days ago

They sold millions of them here in France though but yeah you're right. Especially the Danes who backed down then and again.

load more comments (17 replies)
[–] nichtburningturtle@feddit.org 45 points 2 days ago

Everything is and should be allowed in comedy. Religion is no exception.

[–] postmateDumbass@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

Reality keeps sliding into absurdity rendering satire mute.

[–] FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world 18 points 2 days ago

I think the people's presumption that they have some right to be free from offense has done way more damage than anything.

[–] einkorn@feddit.org 42 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I think Charlie Hebdo comics are often in bad taste and more shock value than critic, but that's no legitimate reason to massacre people.

More than the attack on Charlie Hebdo itself, which I can "understand" in the twisted sense of a religious fanatic, it was the overall ruthlessness of the attackers that shocked me. I remember vividly seeing a video of one of the attackers walking up to a wounded police officer and executing him at point-blank range.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] veganpizza69@lemmy.world 27 points 2 days ago (6 children)

"Islamists" are politically far-right - paleoconservatives, theocrats, fascists.

[–] NineMileTower@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago

See Hamtramck, MI. They took over the local government and banned pride flags. The mayor is an Islamic Trumper. It makes no sense to me.

"I got mine here in the US, so fuck the rest of you all!"

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] Fedegenerate@lemmynsfw.com 5 points 1 day ago (10 children)

Satire should be free. Hate speech should not. People shouldn't be killed for either. I don't particularly cry when bigots die though.

All that said, there's reasons some jokes just aren't worth telling. There's times and spaces, and for some jokes there's neither and that's ok.

load more comments (10 replies)
[–] jaggedrobotpubes@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

I don't have any issue or opinion or dog in the race with the prophet Muhammed, but those idiots made it important to say "muhammed the prophet is a giant cunt who should be laughed at and get a pie in the face" every now and then just to remind everybody how getting to talk works.

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›