this post was submitted on 14 Jan 2025
168 points (96.7% liked)

politics

19336 readers
2244 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

What would you do if you were a white male with billions of dollars and seemingly a lot of extra time on your hands? If you answered anything other than “destroy a social media app and buy a U.S. election” or “go on a podcast to complain about companies not being man enough,” then you’d be wrong! Sorry!

On Friday, Joe Rogan released his latest podcast episode featuring Mark Zuckerberg, the billionaire founder of Facebook, now Meta, who’s recently made a somewhat whiplash-inducing pivot from being a vocal critic of Trump to becoming another ass-kissing sycophant. In their nearly three-hour interview, Zuckerberg talked to Rogan about his passion for hunting invasive pigs in Hawaii and complained about how companies just aren’t masculine enough anymore.

“Masculine energy I think is good, and obviously society has plenty of that, but I think that corporate culture was really trying to get away from it,” Zuckerberg said. “It’s like you want feminine energy, you want masculine energy. I think that that’s all good. But I do think the corporate culture sort of had swung toward being this somewhat more neutered thing.” Must be hard to be one of the top five richest people in the world and still be a whiny little bitch.

top 28 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org 2 points 20 minutes ago

He later added that martial arts really helped him embrace this new alpha male perspective, because being with male friends, where they can “beat each other,”

Off. The last word was "off."

[–] Kolanaki@yiffit.net 4 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago)

I'm pretty sure in order to have masculine energy, you must be a human. Not an artificially created automaton.

[–] Cruxifux@feddit.nl 27 points 17 hours ago

Nobody looks at you and thinks “masculine energy” Zuckerberg.

[–] pycorax@lemmy.world 20 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

Wtf even is masculine energy in the context of a business? Stealing your employees' breast milk?

I still can't believe that happened, it's just so WTF.

[–] SinningStromgald@lemmy.world 53 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

Two pieces of shit talk to each other and all that comes out of it is shit. I'm flabbergasted I tell you. Flabbergasted.

[–] BenLeMan@lemmy.world 6 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

I'm flabbergasted that anyone, literally ANYONE, listens to their blabbering at all. WTF is wrong with people?

[–] SouthEndSunset@lemm.ee 2 points 10 hours ago

They’re incapable of critical thought for a start…

[–] SnotFlickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone 33 points 19 hours ago* (last edited 19 hours ago) (1 children)

Writing these kind of pieces is really important because these thin skinned bitches love to get angry about people speaking truth to power to them, and that's when they let their guard down the most because they're busy trying to cover up how much of a little bitch they are.

[–] whostosay@lemmy.world 3 points 13 hours ago* (last edited 13 hours ago)

I think maybe we should up our game and make like the ~~scorpion~~ vending machine and cleaning robot from Sealab and make necklaces with their teeth.

After further review, we need to be Captain Murphy, they've stolen our teeth for far too long.

For the uninitiated

Part 1

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V0ls6WZfsbI

Part 2

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R_aGaPzD1QU

Part 3

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OPSx283jpJE

Part 4

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XBPiKZGrAHQ

[–] Plebcouncilman@sh.itjust.works 13 points 17 hours ago

Man they really botched his last update.

[–] noxypaws@pawb.social 15 points 18 hours ago (2 children)

The sheer number of people I could individually, directly give life-changing amounts of money, and still leave myself a comfortable ten million dollars or so to live the rest of my life with is just staggering.

With 200 billion (apparently 5 billion less than fuckerberg's current net worth) that's $10,000 each to twenty million people, for.example.

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 6 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

I have said this many times before and, unfortunately, I'll probably end up saying it many times in the future: It should not be legal anywhere to have more money than you can spend in a human lifetime.

[–] noxypaws@pawb.social 3 points 1 hour ago

100% agreed

[–] Zaktor@sopuli.xyz 5 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

Or since he'd still be a narcissistic asshole and would want to experience the happiness and adulation personally, that would be over $2M to each and every resident of Kauai. He wouldn't need security on an island where he made everyone millionaires.

[–] noxypaws@pawb.social 4 points 14 hours ago

I would actually respect that more than anything he's done in his entire life so far. At least a few native Hawaiians would get some real cash.

[–] Glide@lemmy.ca 18 points 18 hours ago* (last edited 18 hours ago) (2 children)

What if I told you there's room to do the things you deem masculine, things you deem feminine, and still identify as yourself? People like Zuckerburg speaking like he has everything figured out when he can't even deconstruct a false dichotomy is some peak pseudo-intellectualism.

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 2 points 9 hours ago

It's so weird. I am cis male and I have never felt like I was anything but a man, but I do not buy into any of this macho bullshit and I never have. I have never felt the need to prove that I'm the biggest and the strongest and the roughest and toughest. I like reading and classic cinema and playing word games and stuff, nothing "manly." I don't feel like less of a man because I never played football or even roughoused as a kid, never went hunting or even shot a gun, could not give less of a shit about sports in general, and I don't even lift bro.

I could not give less of a shit about "masculine energy." I'm secure enough in my gender identity that I don't need it.

And it makes me wonder why Zuckerberg things he does.

[–] MrVilliam@lemm.ee 7 points 17 hours ago

For real. Imagine being that rich and powerful, yet still being so deeply insecure. Can't you afford to just be yourself without worrying about whether every little detail jives with your gender identity? Isn't that the sort of freedom that "fuck you money" is supposed to buy? Now I kinda wonder whether he actually has any interest in MMA whatsoever or he just got into it because the testosterone-laden meatheads all go nuts for it as being a supremely "manly" thing, and he's too insecure to be into something that might be more interesting to him like drone racing or baking because they're not the manliest thing he can think of.

Imagine being one of the wealthiest people in human history and being so creatively and emotionally and socially bankrupt. If he weren't such an insufferable asshole, I might feel sorry for him.

[–] dylanmorgan@slrpnk.net 13 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

I have a solution to the Zucc problem: convince him that real men hunt feral pigs with a knife. Only a knife. He’ll meet a sticky end soon enough.

[–] ryrybang@lemmy.world 3 points 17 hours ago

Plastic butter knife.

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 5 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

I don't know for sure, but I have a feeling that Zuck has a 3 comma painting somewhere on one of his properties....

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xzMUrB-Um1Y

[–] thebigslime@lemmy.world 2 points 15 hours ago

¡Tres Comas!

[–] YurkshireLad@lemmy.ca 9 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

He’s going with whichever way the wind is blowing and right now that’s Trump and the republicans. He knows to do otherwise will adversely impact his business.

[–] Zaktor@sopuli.xyz 2 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

Corporations avoiding adverse impact is just being incredibly bland and apolitical. This is a personal choice, not a business one.

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 1 points 8 hours ago

There is no difference between personal and business when you're a billionaire CEO.

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 3 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

Side bar: I'd love to see more articles linked here in politics from both Jezebel and Wonkette, if I'm being honest. Wonkette typically has better coverage than a great deal of "centrist" outlets from major corporations....

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 2 points 9 hours ago

Oh wow, I haven't thought about Wonkette in years! Glad they're still around. I'll have to check them out again. Thanks for bringing them up!