this post was submitted on 18 Jan 2025
64 points (73.9% liked)

Asklemmy

44465 readers
1043 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy πŸ”

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I don't know if I'm going crazy but looking at the current situation in the world ... please tell me that I'm overexagurating

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Hubi@feddit.org 95 points 5 days ago (3 children)

please tell me that I’m overexagurating

You're overexaggerating.

[–] 30p87@feddit.org 14 points 5 days ago (2 children)

Mach mal nicht so'n Fass auf.

Einfach locker durch die Hose atmen.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] jimmy90@lemmy.world 2 points 3 days ago

this person needs to tell us what about the "current situation" they think is so bad before we can assess how mentally diverse they are

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] HellsBelle@sh.itjust.works 7 points 3 days ago

When Trump was elected again I spent about 3 weeks living with an existential dread I've never in my life felt before.

Whenever it happens, it is coming.

Nah, there won't be WW3. Instead we get countries sabotaging each other via hacking critical infrastructure, proxy wars, propaganda, trade wars.

I doubt there will ever be a direct "hot war" between the top five nuclear powers ever again.

WW3 is not what's gonna kill people, climate change is more likely gonna be humanity's downfall.

[–] HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world 24 points 4 days ago (2 children)

Could already be going. We didn't name them World War 1 and World War 2 until after they were over

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Brkdncr@lemmy.world 35 points 5 days ago (5 children)

No. It’s bad for the economy.

[–] scrubbles@poptalk.scrubbles.tech 15 points 5 days ago (4 children)

The number one thing I've learned through the last several decades is that if it's bad for the economy, no one will do it. Greed is the number one driver of everything right now. Maybe that will change, but I doubt it. Look at all the positive progress we try to make, it's stopped the second anyone rich would lose any money.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Dagwood222@lemm.ee 27 points 5 days ago

The situation today is nowhere near as bad as the Cold War.

Think of it this way. All of the 0.01%ers in china, USA and Russia share the same tastes and values. Think any of them are really hot to blow up their nice places on the Rivera?

[–] gandalf_der_12te@discuss.tchncs.de 10 points 4 days ago (2 children)

I don't think so.

Primarily because there's not economic benefit in it for the ruling class.

Also, we've made the experience of the war in the middle east around 2000 where the USA couldn't even occupy a farmer's state for more than a couple years.

I don't think anybody realistically thinks they can take over another (big) country in this time.

[–] con_fig@programming.dev 9 points 4 days ago

Famously the same was said about WWI re the economic benefit.

[–] dx1@lemmy.ml 4 points 3 days ago

Primarily because there’s not economic benefit in it for the ruling class.

Our history of perpetual war seems to disprove this

[–] JoMiran@lemmy.ml 22 points 5 days ago (1 children)

I've been expecting WW3 since 1983.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] jsomae@lemmy.ml 2 points 3 days ago

There are bad things happening in the world, conflicts, ecological disasters, economic upheavels, and political upheavals. It's easy to look at these bad things and assume things are much worse than they are. Nobody wants there to be a world war 3.

[–] UltraGiGaGigantic@lemmy.ml 10 points 4 days ago

No thanks. Appreciate the offer though, very kind of you.

[–] chaosCruiser@futurology.today 17 points 5 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

In 2001 there was that 9/11 thing and it sounded like WW3 had just started. Turns out, it didn't. Well, lots of things did happen as a result of it, but WW3 wasn't one of them. Soon after that, USA was involved in a number of wars in the middle east and it felt like WW3 had just started. Again, it didn't. Some time around 2010s the tension between North Korea and South Korea was getting pretty intense, and a friend of mine started talking WW3... As usual, WW3 didn't start.

At the moment, the situation in Ukraine feels just like all the other major incidents, but we'll see how it works out. If you expose your mind to tabloid journalism, it begins to feel like the entire world is about to explode. History has a tendency of repeating itself, so I suggest reading about the things that lead to WW1 and WW2. Once, you've done that, you'll begin to pay attention to certain signs and start ignoring most of the nonsense tabloids keep writing about.

[–] tetris11@lemmy.ml 12 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (3 children)

That's just survivorship bias, you didn't live through the worlds where all those things escalated into flat out war, you dimension skipping hippie.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] guy@piefed.social 3 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

You are probably overexaggerating.
There are increased conflicts over the world but no signs of a world war.

First there are no willing candidates for it. Not even Russia which is engaged in a war is willing to make the push to engage NATO, which is the closest to a world war we would get.
Neither is Iran willing to go into war which was very obvious after their actions when Israel made ample opportunities for them to escalate conflict.
And for China.. well war is bad for business, and China really likes doing business.

However the US with Trump at the helm. 🀷 Who the fuck knows. Maybe not world war but I am adding military occupation of Panama and Greenland to my bingo just in case.

[–] Auli@lemmy.ca 2 points 3 days ago

1 to 2 years no. Next decade sure. The super powers are isolating themselves as their economies become less entwined I expect something to happen.

[–] wewbull@feddit.uk 13 points 5 days ago (6 children)

No.

Russia (the current primary aggressor) is on the brink of a banking system collapse. It doesn't have the money to wage war on a bigger scale than it already is.

China is far more interested in trade than hostilities.

The middle east has been a tinder box for over a hundred years. I don't see it dragging outsiders into it and hopefully we have a respite coming.

Central Asia has tension between India and Pakistan, but that's nothing new. India could piss off China or the reverse, and if that kicked off the loss of life could be on a scale that would be unprecedented but still I think it wouldn't drag the west in.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] SparrowHawk@feddit.it 10 points 5 days ago (24 children)

I think that the true world war 3 will not be nations against nations, but citizens against their own nations. The stage is set for an actual paradigm shift or system annihilation. We will not support civilization if it doesn't change, either the people destroy the pyramid or the pyramid will destroy the world.

load more comments (24 replies)
[–] iii@mander.xyz 12 points 5 days ago

It's reminiscent of the cold war.

[–] Wes4Humanity@lemm.ee 6 points 4 days ago

So, WW3 won't happen until the oligarchy says it's time. Not sure why now would be the time, but I suppose it could be. There's like a billion people in the world making a dollar a day, a few billion people only making a few dollars a day... That's a few billion dollars per day the oligarchy almost certainly thinks belongs in their pocket instead. So I could see them continuing to squeeze the world for every last drop of wealth, which I think will cause unrest in a lot of places. Add climate change to that and I think things just get bad everywhere for most people. Obviously the oligarchy will just go to their islands, yachts, bunkers until a few billion are dead and they can pop back out with their private armies ready to "save" the world.

A lot of people think they need us to buy their trinkets, but the entire consumer middle class is only like 100 years old, and I think was only designed to keep us distracted while they plundered the world. Now that a small handful of people own everything, and soon enough robots and AI will replace most human labor, it's mission accomplished and we can go back to feudalism where they are gods and everyone else is slaves.

load more comments
view more: next β€Ί