this post was submitted on 12 Feb 2025
149 points (98.7% liked)

Opensource

1879 readers
191 users here now

A community for discussion about open source software! Ask questions, share knowledge, share news, or post interesting stuff related to it!

CreditsIcon base by Lorc under CC BY 3.0 with modifications to add a gradient



founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 22 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] sbv@sh.itjust.works 17 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

I'm looking for a repo to host a couple of projects. I hadn't considered codeberg as a home until now.

I guess I'll donate when I sign up.

[–] comfy@lemmy.ml 6 points 15 hours ago

Exactly. I've already hosted a small script project there but this blog post reminded me I'd forgotten to add them to my December donations list.

[–] tiredofsametab@fedia.io 3 points 13 hours ago

I had a codeburg account I never did anything with and was worried they got hacked or something. However, since I had never really used it, I just kinda shrugged (separate email, randomly-generated pass). They sent an email mentioning it was this sort of spam.

[–] FizzyOrange@programming.dev 3 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

I guess an easy fix for that particular issue is to severely rate limit mentions. E.g. if a user mentions more than 100 users in 1 hour then delay them and flag the account. Then you can whitelist it if it's a legit CI bot or whatever.

[–] xtools@programming.dev 1 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

this could be gamed though - mention 99 users, switch accounts, rinse and repeat

[–] FizzyOrange@programming.dev 1 points 13 hours ago

I assume there's some barrier to creating accounts that makes it difficult? If not there's pretty much nothing they can do.

[–] exu@feditown.com 43 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Got two notifications this morning where I was tagged in an issue, but just a few minutes later when I tried to view the report it was already gone.
Really, props to the Codeberg moderation team for their hard work.

[–] fxomt@lemmy.dbzer0.com 10 points 20 hours ago* (last edited 19 hours ago)

I woke up to this, this is what it was if anyone was wondering:

edit: they've sent out apology emails to all who were affected. there was no leak of emails so it seems

[–] andioop@programming.dev 10 points 21 hours ago* (last edited 21 hours ago)

I was tagged, immediately clicked to see the link so I could report abuse, and got a 404. Very fast response. I appreciate that and the message Codeberg sent out that OP posted here. Came to p.d to see if anyone posted it yet.

[–] onlinepersona@programming.dev 2 points 13 hours ago

Quite childish behavior.

Other opinions exist, I must exert my free speech to ridicule other opinions and try to offend those holding them

"Signed, a free speech absolutist"

Anti Commercial-AI license

[–] asudox@lemmy.asudox.dev 32 points 1 day ago

Seems like codeberg got significant attention for spammers to come and do this.

[–] haui_lemmy@lemmy.giftedmc.com 11 points 23 hours ago (2 children)

I currently have an outage from my own forgejo insrance (which codeberg runs as well afaik) since yesterday. I wonder if that is connected.

[–] pol9000@lemmy.world 12 points 22 hours ago (3 children)

Here someone abused some feature to automatically create comments mentioning hundreds or more users so that the server send the comment notification via email. The email I got had just the N word followed by "balls" and lots of mentioned accounts. Not sure if others got longer messages?

[–] tiredofsametab@fedia.io 1 points 13 hours ago

same email here.

[–] andioop@programming.dev 1 points 18 hours ago

That's exactly what I got too

[–] 0x0@programming.dev 0 points 19 hours ago

So that's what it was...

[–] poVoq@slrpnk.net 9 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

More likely due to extreme AI scraping. That has been an issue with selfhosted Forgejo instances for months now and it is a complete PITA to deal with.

[–] asudox@lemmy.asudox.dev 7 points 20 hours ago (1 children)
[–] xtools@programming.dev 2 points 13 hours ago

interesting project, thx for sharing! though:

There is not currently a way to differentiate between web crawlers that are indexing sites for search purposes, vs crawlers that are training AI models. ANY SITE THIS SOFTWARE IS APPLIED TO WILL LIKELY DISAPPEAR FROM ALL SEARCH RESULTS.

[–] TheV2@programming.dev 1 points 14 hours ago

I'm glad I saw this post and codeberg's statement before the spam notifications.

[–] thirdBreakfast@lemmy.world 9 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Is there an easier way to give them money than becoming a member?