this post was submitted on 19 Feb 2025
856 points (99.4% liked)

PC Gaming

9592 readers
561 users here now

For PC gaming news and discussion. PCGamingWiki

Rules:

  1. Be Respectful.
  2. No Spam or Porn.
  3. No Advertising.
  4. No Memes.
  5. No Tech Support.
  6. No questions about buying/building computers.
  7. No game suggestions, friend requests, surveys, or begging.
  8. No Let's Plays, streams, highlight reels/montages, random videos or shorts.
  9. No off-topic posts/comments, within reason.
  10. Use the original source, no clickbait titles, no duplicates. (Submissions should be from the original source if possible, unless from paywalled or non-english sources. If the title is clickbait or lacks context you may lightly edit the title.)

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I did not realize they were trying to compete in the first place.

(page 5) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] starshipHighwayman69@lemmy.ml 3 points 3 days ago (7 children)

Hopefully Amazon doesn't buy steam now.

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] Grandwolf319@sh.itjust.works 3 points 3 days ago

I went to their website, it reminded me of AWS.

At least prime video looks half decent.

[–] Netrunner@programming.dev -1 points 2 days ago (3 children)

Valve can make some good calls, but do you guys -really- think enshittification is not coming for it ever? It's just a matter of time.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] But_my_mom_says_im_cool@lemmy.world 0 points 3 days ago (18 children)

It’s weird how gamers see Gabe Newel as “their” billionaire, and valve as “their” corporation, and convince themselves that this makes it ok and ethical to be a billionaire and a massive corporation bordering on monopoly. Stop behaving like these corporations are your sports teams.

[–] riodoro1@lemmy.world 1 points 3 days ago

Their „sports teams” are vessels for billionaires to make more money too. They have barely anything at all in common with sports.

[–] rumba@lemmy.zip 1 points 3 days ago

True, we shouldn't be 'backing' them.

Consumerism and capitalism essentially dictate that large-scale gaming can't exist without publishers. Studios need to get funded, and most developers struggle with tasks like publishing, marketing, analytics, and handling payments. While a company could theoretically manage all of this itself, it demands a lot of specialized talent, which schools only teach to a limited extent in a manner relevant to the gaming industry.

Publishers (almost) can't help but be somewhat offensive to the public. They are there to make money and (the good ones, at least) put money back into the market so they can make more money.

Valve is less offensive than many/most. Gabe was an underdog story. Valve released some damn fine games before they primarily became publishers.

load more comments (15 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›