this post was submitted on 27 Feb 2025
608 points (98.1% liked)

Technology

63386 readers
5494 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] iAvicenna@lemmy.world 35 points 19 hours ago

this is gonna take rule 34 to a whole another level

[–] Zip2@feddit.uk 37 points 21 hours ago (4 children)

My friend wants to know if it can generate VR videos too?

[–] wabafee@lemmy.world 5 points 14 hours ago

Tell your friend that my friend is also asking too.

[–] Lucky_777@lemmy.world 7 points 17 hours ago

Asking the real questions

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] FreshLight@sh.itjust.works 147 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (3 children)

It's super funny to me that they named it "WanX" haha

[–] iAvicenna@lemmy.world 22 points 19 hours ago

it fulfilled its name mandate %100

mind-blowing

Hmm, it's certainly blowing something.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] hmmm@sh.itjust.works 27 points 23 hours ago (3 children)
[–] Arda1@lemmy.world 9 points 19 hours ago

I dont like that i was able to tell

[–] whalebiologist@lemmy.world 5 points 18 hours ago

fucking saw it too 😅

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] drmoose@lemmy.world 78 points 1 day ago (7 children)

Good.

Hot take but I think AI porn will be revolutionary and mostly in a good way. Sex industry is extremely wasteful and inefficient use of our collective time that also often involves a lot of abuse and dark business practices. It's just somehow taboo to even mention this.

[–] ZILtoid1991@lemmy.world 18 points 18 hours ago (4 children)

Yes, but will also hurt the very workers' bottom line, and with some clever workarounds, it'll be used to fabricate defamatory material other methods were not good at.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] JackFrostNCola@lemmy.world 41 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Sometimes you come across a video and you are like 'oh this. I need more of THIS.'
And then you start tailoring searches to try find more of the same but you keep getting generic or repeated results because the lack of well described/defined content overuse of video TAGs (obviously to try get more views with a large net rather than being specific).
But would i watch AI content if i could feed it a description of what i want? Hell yeah!

I mean there are only so many videos of girls giving a blowjob while he eats tacos and watches old Black & White documentaries about the advancements of mechanical production processes.

[–] Appoxo@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

Not to mention the users that may have a specific interest in some topic/action and basically all types of potential sources are locked bwhind paywalls.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] dumbass@leminal.space 19 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I hate it when you find a good video, it does the job really well, so a few days later you're like, yeah let's watch that one again, you type in every single description you can about the video and find everything else but the video you want and they're barely anywhere near as good.

Hell I'd take an AI porn search engine for now, let me describe in detail what the video I'm looking for is so I can finally see it again.

[–] Scrollone@feddit.it 5 points 19 hours ago

Always, always download your favourite videos. Today they're available, tomorrow you don't know. (Remember the great PornHub purge? Pepperidge Farms remember)

[–] ghostfish@lemm.ee 5 points 20 hours ago

I usually just download them for this reason.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] Ulrich@feddit.org 81 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (3 children)

Oh my God! That's disgusting! AI porn online!? Where!? Where do they post those!? There's so many of them, though. Which one?

[–] Randomgal@lemmy.ca 38 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Fucking disgusting unethical shit. Tell me where to find it so I can avoid it pls.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Aggravationstation@feddit.uk 166 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

The year is 1997. A young boy is about to watch a porn video for the first time on a grainy VHS tape. An older version of himself from the far off year of 2025 appears.

Me: "You know, in the future, you'll make your own porn videos."

90s me: "Wow, you mean I'll get to have lots of hot sex!?!?"

Me: "Ha! No. So Nvidia will release this system called CUDA..."

[–] codexarcanum@lemmy.dbzer0.com 60 points 1 day ago (6 children)

I thought this was going to go Watchmen for a moment. Like...

It is 1997, I am a young boy, I am jerking off to a grainy porno playing over stolen cinemax.

It is 2007, i am in my dorm, i am jerking off to a forum thread full of hi-res porno.

It is 2027, i am jerking off to an ai porno stream that mutates to my desires in real time. I am about to nut so hard that it shatters my perception of time.

[–] Zron@lemmy.world 6 points 13 hours ago

The AI camera will still zoom in on the guys nuts as you’re about to bust tho.

[–] UltraGiGaGigantic@lemmy.ml 1 points 9 hours ago

You nut so hard in 2027 it teleports you back to 1997?

[–] ThePantser@lemmy.world 24 points 1 day ago (5 children)

Oops the stream hallucinated and mutated into a horror show with women with nipples that are mouths and dicks with eyeballs.

[–] Bgugi@lemmy.world 5 points 13 hours ago

I cannot for the life of me find it, but there was an article before the modern explosion of ML into the public consciousness where a guy found that one of the big search engines offered an API to "rate" nsfw images on a numeric scale. The idea was that site admins could use it to automatically filter content with a bit more granularity.

So naturally, he trained a naive image generating model with the nsfw score as the sole metric of success, and got results much like you describe. Results were pretty much "what if Dali and kronenberg had a baby with slaanesh?"

[–] TeamAssimilation@infosec.pub 8 points 19 hours ago

“Nothing else excites me anymore” - 2027 you, probably

[–] MaggiWuerze@feddit.org 6 points 20 hours ago
[–] Iheartcheese@lemmy.world 26 points 1 day ago

I am about to nut so hard that it shatters my perception of time.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] shades@lemmy.dbzer0.com 26 points 1 day ago
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›