this post was submitted on 03 Mar 2025
1073 points (97.6% liked)

politics

20623 readers
3767 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Summary

Minnesota Governor Tim Walz, Kamala Harris’ 2024 running mate, has suggested he may run for president in 2028.

Reflecting on the Democrats’ loss to Donald Trump and JD Vance, he admitted: “A large number of people did not believe we were fighting for them in the last election – and that’s the big disconnect.”

Walz said his life experience, rather than ambition, would guide his decision.

Though his VP campaign was marred by gaffes, he remains open to running if he feels prepared.

(page 3) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] aggelalex@lemmy.world 10 points 13 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago) (10 children)

Oh yes, please, older people, maybe I'll have my late great grandma run a campaign for the democrats from her grave.

Edit: not that I prefer a republican after trump. I'm certainly not far right. But I'm tired of seeing running leaders being this old. Can you americans get AOC to run for once?

[–] SippyCup@feddit.nl 5 points 11 hours ago (4 children)

No sooner than he mentions that he might run to the right wing attacks on his age begin.

I'd like someone younger too but let's take the candidates we can eh? Dude's compassionate and far left for a dam at the moment.

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 11 hours ago

And I'm sure he'll choose a young running mate (AOC maybe? Though I'd hate to see her leave Congress for such a powerless position).

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Goldholz@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 11 hours ago

Age isnt always an indicator on how people are mentally, and if they are a backwards prick

[–] Triasha@lemmy.world 1 points 10 hours ago

Walz will be a perfectly normal age to run for president.

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] MilitantAtheist@lemmy.world 33 points 16 hours ago

It's cute that they think there's gonna be another election.

[–] anarchiddy@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 8 hours ago (3 children)

If he was less supportive of Israel and law enforcement I'd be more excited about this.

Honestly there isn't anyone left in the party that I'm happy with - even AOC started transitioning into radlib territory.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Kalysta@lemm.ee 81 points 20 hours ago (9 children)

Tim Walz unleashed would have won this.

He was hamstrug by Harris. He’s likely the dem’s best choice for 2028.

So of course they’ll run Newsome or Shapiro or Hillary Clinton again because they’re a bunch of idiots.

[–] Feathercrown@lemmy.world 4 points 11 hours ago

Running Hillary again

The fact that this is somewhat believable is so stupid

[–] isaaclw@lemmy.world 33 points 20 hours ago (4 children)

And Harris was hamstrung by Biden.

She could have been better.

[–] return2ozma@lemmy.world 23 points 17 hours ago* (last edited 17 hours ago) (9 children)

She is a cop. She dropped out in 15th place in the 2020 primary before she was embarrassed in her home state of California. They should have never ran her and that's why they didn't do a primary.

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 11 hours ago* (last edited 11 hours ago) (1 children)

Prosecutors are not cops.

I'm curious how you picture a society functioning without prosecutors. Please enlighten me.

Shit like this is why people don't take the "defund the police" movement seriously.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (8 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (7 replies)
[–] Stern@lemmy.world 3 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

We know that female candidates with male VP's named Tim don't win against Republicans. Hillary and Kamala proved that. But this is wholly different, so its possible, concievable...

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Kcap@lemmy.world 18 points 17 hours ago (4 children)

I'm feeling pretty certain the dems will run Buttigieg. Feels like they've been prepping him for a while.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] OccultIconoclast@reddthat.com 36 points 20 hours ago* (last edited 20 hours ago) (24 children)

Walz was great in 2024. He had enthusiasm and actually answered the interviewers' questions. I would have preferred the symbolic victory of a black woman president, but I like Walz better as an individual person. I think he could have won if he'd been the presidential candidate. Well, Harris won too, but I mean he could have won even with the voter suppression stealing all those democratic votes.

President Walz and Vice President Cortez is the future we need. But probably not the future we'll get.

load more comments (24 replies)
[–] drascus@sh.itjust.works 50 points 21 hours ago (6 children)

Thinking there is going to be a real election in 2028 is the most optimistic thing I've heard in a while.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] astutemural@midwest.social 243 points 1 day ago (12 children)

The Harris campaign had to cover the governor’s tracks when he tripped up during a California fundraiser by stating that the constitutionally-mandated system used to select the president, otherwise known as the electoral college, “needs to go”.

How the hell is that a gaffe? It's both the truth and exactly what people want to hear. Any lib who thinks like that needs to kindly keep their mouths shut for the next four years. This country needs radical change, the only choice you get is which one you want.

load more comments (12 replies)
[–] bradd@lemmy.world 13 points 18 hours ago (4 children)
[–] hOrni@lemmy.world 4 points 13 hours ago (7 children)
load more comments (7 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›