this post was submitted on 30 Jun 2023
28 points (91.2% liked)

No Stupid Questions

35905 readers
1212 users here now

No such thing. Ask away!

!nostupidquestions is a community dedicated to being helpful and answering each others' questions on various topics.

The rules for posting and commenting, besides the rules defined here for lemmy.world, are as follows:

Rules (interactive)


Rule 1- All posts must be legitimate questions. All post titles must include a question.

All posts must be legitimate questions, and all post titles must include a question. Questions that are joke or trolling questions, memes, song lyrics as title, etc. are not allowed here. See Rule 6 for all exceptions.



Rule 2- Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material.

Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material. You will be warned first, banned second.



Rule 3- Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here.

Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here. Breaking this rule will not get you or your post removed, but it will put you at risk, and possibly in danger.



Rule 4- No self promotion or upvote-farming of any kind.

That's it.



Rule 5- No baiting or sealioning or promoting an agenda.

Questions which, instead of being of an innocuous nature, are specifically intended (based on reports and in the opinion of our crack moderation team) to bait users into ideological wars on charged political topics will be removed and the authors warned - or banned - depending on severity.



Rule 6- Regarding META posts and joke questions.

Provided it is about the community itself, you may post non-question posts using the [META] tag on your post title.

On fridays, you are allowed to post meme and troll questions, on the condition that it's in text format only, and conforms with our other rules. These posts MUST include the [NSQ Friday] tag in their title.

If you post a serious question on friday and are looking only for legitimate answers, then please include the [Serious] tag on your post. Irrelevant replies will then be removed by moderators.



Rule 7- You can't intentionally annoy, mock, or harass other members.

If you intentionally annoy, mock, harass, or discriminate against any individual member, you will be removed.

Likewise, if you are a member, sympathiser or a resemblant of a movement that is known to largely hate, mock, discriminate against, and/or want to take lives of a group of people, and you were provably vocal about your hate, then you will be banned on sight.



Rule 8- All comments should try to stay relevant to their parent content.



Rule 9- Reposts from other platforms are not allowed.

Let everyone have their own content.



Rule 10- Majority of bots aren't allowed to participate here.



Credits

Our breathtaking icon was bestowed upon us by @Cevilia!

The greatest banner of all time: by @TheOneWithTheHair!

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

What are your ideas, that if you could implement would likely stop our species from warring so much?

I'm asking for a reasonable ones, but if not - at least make them funny :P

(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] b1_@kbin.social 2 points 1 year ago

Send everyone in charge to an Enya concert. "We can sail, we can sail, With the Orinoco flow..."

[–] Darkonion@kbin.social 2 points 1 year ago

No hands for anyone. Possibly no feet too. Only the cooperative will survive.

[–] Tamhenk@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

Humans need to evolve to a state where love, compassion and being helpful to others is ingrained. At the moment we're just clever beasts.

Sadly though, I don't think we have enough time.

[–] Godnroc@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

People say violence is never an option, but violence is always the last option. We can try arguing, debating, convincing, compromising, making concessions, begging, bartering, betting, but at the end of the list is the threat of violence followed by actual violence.

If we want to reduce violence, we need to find a way to settle disagreement somewhere before violence. Otherwise, all disagreements just get closer and closer in a game of brinksmenship. Those who blink first lose.

[–] Cevilia@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 1 year ago (3 children)
[–] ivanafterall@kbin.social 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Sorry, but I won't be satisfied as long as that guy has more ponies than me. And he's most definitely NOT my friend.

[–] Cevilia@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 1 year ago

That's alright. That guy won't be in your shard. You'll have the most pony friends ever.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] arcrust@lemmy.fmhy.ml 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Eradicate fear.

Fear of losing power. Fear of "them". Fear of going to hell because you didn't convert someone. Fear of lost resources.

It all boils down to fear. The problem is that fear is contagious. It's easier to convince someone to back your side if you make them afraid vs hopeful.

[–] WookieMunster@kbin.social 2 points 1 year ago (2 children)

How do you eradicate fear?

[–] arcrust@lemmy.fmhy.ml 1 points 1 year ago

I wish I had an answer to that. For me, it's knowledge and recognition. Having an open mind to hear both sides of an argument and trying to focus on facts, not "what ifs". Then paying attention to not just what's being said, but how it's being said. It's pretty easy to see when someone is trying to get you emotional rather than logical,but you have to be looking for it.

When I hear a politician say "they're trying to take away...." or "they want you to...". That's them trying to make you fear the other side. I don't give a shit if you're left, right, capitalist, communist, or a dictator, if you're goal is to make me fear what the other side will do with power then you've already lost me. Because I know, that really you're afraid to lose power and so you make other people afraid too. Unfortunately, it works for way too many people.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] GunnarRunnar@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago

Put the ones in charge to the front line.

[–] Alpagu@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

I think the solution is to have enough renewable energy for all of humanity.

[–] ColonelSanders@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Humans are gonna human unfortunately. Biologically I’m not convinced we are capable of eliminating war because humans are competitive by nature. To the point that there will always be one group or another trying to force its ideals onto another.

I’ve often thought about “what if we could snap our fingers and every weapon beyond that of a spear (technologically) was vanished, and any/every attempt to fashion something deadlier would fail/poof out of existence as well.”

That might stave off large scale war but there would still be tribal warring on a smaller scale I fear. Plus a ton of other issues that would arise from suddenly having no guns/missiles/projectiles/etc.

[–] xarvh@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago

You may want to read some anthropology before you decide that war is a biological imperative.

[–] nafri@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago

this is a bit grim but global-wide information control that shreds any information which will help the growth of the idea of overly patriotic but less enough to not kill the domestic culture (but i think, not necessarily always telling the truth). that will also promote the sense of global village and transnationalism. and relocate the idea of war to other rivalries like on sports or something, idk.

basically limit the free will without showing it. I can't think if it's gonna happen or this even possible.

[–] DaDragon@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Well effectively, it would entail an all-encompassing global spying machine that gathers all data possible, and imprisons anyone who deviates from the expected baseline. (Wouldn’t end well for me either.) You have to remove most individuality to remove reasons for fighting. And even if you imprison 999 false leads to capture just one instigator, that’s the only way to ‘guarantee’ a fairly high level of security.

So what I’d say we need is 1984 or Мы levels of oversight to have any chance of curtailing conflict for good.

EDIT: oh, and re-education. Lots and lots of re-education.

[–] ivanafterall@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Simple. We make war illegal.

[–] Col3814444@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago

‘Taps forehead’

Genius.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Establish a global trade network in a way that everyone is completely dependent on everyone else.

[–] RIotingPacifist@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Capitalist trade necessitates competition & states, even if you ignore how violent setting up that trade network was, the need for competition to push profits up means you need to put down local competition or regulations (e.g the US (where the biggest companies reside) need to coup democratic leaders that get in the way of profits, such as the Iranian coup, etc), but people don't like that so you end up with counter revolutions which puts forces hostile to the US in power, and eager to give the US a bloody nose (but mostly through proxy wars).

And that's without even getting into the trade creating Cheneys who want war because it is profitable.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] _kato@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Make the old men fight each other and soilder just refusing to follow orders that seem stupid

[–] GustavoM@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

It's (theoretically) impossible -- you can't break someone's (ignorant and established) will/ideas/plans with words alone or treats. Most world leaders are megalomaniacs by heart, i.e they won't stop until they are done with what they want.

[–] encync2@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Put everyone in a time-out until they can play nicely with the other children (because let's face it, a lot of them are acting like children)

[–] JunctionSystem@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

The only way to permanently end war is universal omnicide.

[–] Anitabath097@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Economic democracy; if money and resources cause wars then why not let everyone have control? I will probably hear the human nature stuff but being social is just as if not more important than hurting your species/society.

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›