398

Summary

Trump stated the U.S. will "go as far as we have to go" to gain control of Greenland, citing national and international security needs.

JD Vance will visit Greenland’s Pituffik military base, scaling back a broader visit amid backlash from Greenland and Denmark.

Greenlandic Prime Minister Mute Egede condemned the move as "aggressive pressure" and insisted that "Greenland belongs to the Greenlanders."

Trump has repeatedly expressed interest in acquiring Greenland, asserting that U.S. control is essential for security.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top new old
[-] Hobbes_Dent@lemmy.world 202 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

The United States is threatening invasion of a free and allied nation.

The media is complicit.

The population is complicit.

Edit: The military is complicit.

[-] Plastic_Ramses@lemmy.world 26 points 1 year ago

Anyone who didn't vote is especially responsible.

Fucking dumbasses that they are.

[-] Cheems@lemmy.world 11 points 1 year ago

I literally can't tell the difference between the parties still. /s

load more comments (34 replies)
[-] masterofn001@lemmy.ca 14 points 1 year ago

The military is complicit.

[-] Hobbes_Dent@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago

That’s so true that I’m gonna edit and add it.

[-] FourWaveforms@lemm.ee 8 points 1 year ago

I'm not complicit. You're complicit

[-] littlebrother@lemm.ee 6 points 1 year ago

Military is complicit

Like hell any of us is gonna bear arms against our allies.

load more comments (2 replies)

Welp. It was nice being in NATO while it lasted I guess.

You guys should definitely invoke article 5 if we pull anything, and if orangeboi vetoes it, straight up ignore him and A5 anyways. I am completely serious.

load more comments (1 replies)

That's basically a declaration of war against a NATO country.
The US should thus also bomb itself through article 5 when it decides to invade Greenland.

[-] Uniquitous@lemmy.one 45 points 1 year ago

Fucking believe him. Take it as the threat that it is. Prepare immediately.

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] Aliktren@lemmy.world 34 points 1 year ago

War with rest of Nato, really ?

[-] floofloof@lemmy.ca 28 points 1 year ago

What better way to destroy NATO for the Russians?

[-] SarcasticMan@lemmy.world 30 points 1 year ago

Every fucking time he announces tariffs they hit the buy Greenland or make Canada a state bullshit button.

load more comments (1 replies)

I wish this man would finally do something beneficial for the world and just die already... preferably of a cheeseburger related causation (heart attack, stroke, or choke).

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] HexadecimalSky@lemmy.world 22 points 1 year ago

Why? Why does he want greenland?

[-] floofloof@lemmy.ca 22 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Strategic control of the melting Arctic, half of which is bordered by Russia and the other half by Greenland and Canada, both of which Trump wants to invade. Also a foothold in Greenland would be useful in an assault on Canada, whose resources both Putin and Trump want. Canada would be fully surrounded by the USA and Russia.

[-] HexadecimalSky@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago

Okay, that makes sense, not good sense, but it's not just the inane ramblings of a mad man.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Hayduke@lemmy.world 19 points 1 year ago

Seems to be a combination of Putin sowing chaos, trump desperately wanting to be just like his comrade boyfriend by illegally annexing sovereign territory and just general dick-swinging. We already have a base there. I guess they just want to waste more money by occupying a tundra. He must have some contractors that he owes.

Time to toss him on his ass. I’m sick of this horseshit.

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] ChristmasApe@discuss.online 7 points 1 year ago

Trying to rationalize anything on his agenda is just going to drive you nuts.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (7 replies)
[-] barneypiccolo@lemm.ee 17 points 1 year ago

Is he actually threatening another NATO member with military action?

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] leadore@lemmy.world 16 points 1 year ago

NATO countries should put out a statement that they are ready to defend Greenland from any incursion.

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] IphtashuFitz@lemmy.world 14 points 1 year ago

So when will the 3 day special operation begin?

[-] MCHumphry@lemm.ee 13 points 1 year ago

Just a little imperialism we promise 🥸

[-] cupcakezealot@lemmy.blahaj.zone 9 points 1 year ago

god i was so happy when i heard he got shot and then he had to ruin it by surviving.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 27 Mar 2025
398 points (99.3% liked)

politics

30937 readers
2193 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles. Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to US politics and contain quality and original content. Social Media adjacent hosts like Substack are allowed, but ONLY if they tie back to a company/subsidiary. No personal or friend group blogs and no self-promotion. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and re-hosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing other users of being bots or paid actors.
  3. No memes, trolling, misinformation, or low-effort posts/comments (including reposts). If you see posts like this that anger you, do not engage. Report, block, and live a happier life than they do. Any slap-fight is subject to comment removals. Fights full of rule violations will result in temporary bans to cool off.
  4. No manipulating votes via bots or alt accounts; this will result in permanent bans. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in an account ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be permanently banned.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules and use critical thinking when reading, posting, and commenting. Users that repeatedly have comments or posts removed, weaponize reports, or violate the code of conduct, will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users. The reason(s) behind moderator action(s) are publicly available through the Modlog.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS