this post was submitted on 28 Jun 2023
128 points (97.8% liked)

PC Master Race

14975 readers
129 users here now

A community for PC Master Race.

Rules:

  1. No bigotry: Including racism, sexism, homophobia, transphobia, or xenophobia. Code of Conduct.
  2. Be respectful. Everyone should feel welcome here.
  3. No NSFW content.
  4. No Ads / Spamming.
  5. Be thoughtful and helpful: even with ‘stupid’ questions. The world won’t be made better or worse by snarky comments schooling naive newcomers on Lemmy.

Notes:

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] psycrow@lemmy.world 29 points 1 year ago (8 children)

Fun fact, did you know that google deliberately makes their products run worse on browsers like Firefox so users will think the browsers are slow? Please support Firefox, it's the only real browser not based on Googles technology (like Brave is), and it's actively fighting Google's monopoly on web browsing.

[–] Kirkwall@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Firefox is based. Glad I switched over recently.

[–] W33PINGVIK1NG@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Librewolf is a fork of Firefox, and is absolutely better for privacy and security; way more based than Firefox, you should check it out m8 :)

[–] tsukii@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Using LibreWolf right now! The experience is smooth most of the time, although you do need to switch to Firefox when you need to view DRM-controlled content (like when participating an online course, for example).

[–] Rogueren@discuss.tchncs.de 4 points 1 year ago

Yeah DRM content is why I'm on Firefox instead of Librewolf. I may look into hardening FF in the near future

[–] Lojcs@lemm.ee 4 points 1 year ago

User experience is actually better if you're not using chrome since you won't be subject to Google's a/b tests

"The job isn't done, until Lotus won't run" - attributed to Bill Gates/Microsoft

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] ZytaZiouZ@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (4 children)

Firefox for life! Well as long as they don't go evil or bankrupt. I am not surprised at all though.

  1. Kneecap plugin performance especially for AdBlock plugins claiming it's for security.
  2. Notify users that those plugins are slowing down Chrome.
  3. ???????
  4. Profit... or people hopefully switch
[–] NightOwl@lemmy.one 4 points 1 year ago

/r/firefox is also still closed and opened up on https://fedia.io/m/firefox. So firefox people are cool in general. 🦊

[–] oliver@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 year ago

Firefox for life

It's not just a Chrome-, it's a Google thing. If you want to install F-Droid or Exodus on Android today, you have to get past Google's warning that you are putting malware on your device.

as they don’t go evil

Well... anyone who packs their advertising through third-party sites has long since defected to the dark side. It seems to me that the ghost of Brendan Eich is still haunting Mozilla.

[–] DreamySweet@vlemmy.net 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Well as long as they don’t go evil or bankrupt

If they do, there is always LibreWolf.

[–] jmshrv@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

Maintaining a browser is an insane amount of work. Without Mozilla working on Firefox, LibreWolf will stagnate and become unusable.

[–] N01R3@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I mean, they've already started cutting some features I have used... So I've got Firefox and Pale Moon on my PC to cover the loss of ftp support. And since some pages don't work in Firefox in either instance of engine, I have to have Chrome installed...

[–] cowmouse@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

It genuinely sucks that some websites don't bother to support Firefox! When you encounter one, you might want to complain to the devs and open a webcompat issue.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] ThinlySlicedGlizzy@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (5 children)

Mistake #1, using chrome. Just switch to firefox ~~or brave~~ just use firefox

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] FrankTheHealer@lemmy.ml 7 points 1 year ago (2 children)

'No I dont think I will'

Use Firefox btw

[–] caffinz@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 year ago (4 children)

+1 for Firefox, it's a great experience on both desktop and mobile!

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] NightOwl@lemmy.one 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] Debrox@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago (2 children)

It's crazy how low the firefox market share is. It’s like 3% worldwide.

[–] Dark_Blade@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

For such a good browser too!

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] lawrence@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I mean, when an extension needs to block 300 ads...

[–] deafboy@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

And some sites are trying to load them again, and again, and again, so the poor plugin has no choice than to go hard on resources.

[–] Vangarell@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

Such a baseless statement. Ad blockers actually improve performance by removing random junk videos, and images from running on the site.

I'm so glad to have switched to Firefox.

[–] Hetoimos@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago (7 children)

Firefox + DuckDuckGo search engine

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] Takina_sOldPairTM@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Why even use Google Chrome 👁👄👁

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

My work mandates it unfortunately.

[–] CupDock@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (3 children)

They mandate the browser you use? Seems a little overbearing.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] ekZepp@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] rk96@lemmy.one 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The problem is that you are using chrome to begin with

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Call_Me_Maple@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (5 children)

So I've heard good and bad things about Firefox in this thread. The bad things being mainly the performance, and some sites just don't load...

So my question to you is, If I'm comfortably browsing on Brave with uBlock on, is it really worth the switch right now?

[–] Danatronic@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The founder of Brave had previously been fired from Mozilla due to his homophobia. Firefox is the more ethical choice.

But it's also perfectly fine for most web browsing, and is the only web browser I've seen with extensions like ublock available on mobile.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] grue@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

You're posting on Lemmy and you joined seven days ago, so it's a safe bet that you have some opinions about Reddit. So I'll put it this way: if you have a problem with the way Reddit concentrates power in the hands of u/Spez and want to support alternatives because of that, then you should also have a similar problem with how Chromium-based browsers concentrate power in the hands of Google and reject Brave in favor of Firefox.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] teft@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (5 children)

You should switch from chrome to firefox. Less tracking built in to the browser. Also chrome is planning to deprecate manifest V2 which will break all adblockers.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] speaker_hat@lemmy.one 1 points 1 year ago

That's a low-level Microsoft style move. Didn't thought Google will do it

[–] supermurs@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago

What a cunning plan!

load more comments
view more: next ›