this post was submitted on 04 Oct 2023
35 points (87.2% liked)

Piracy: ꜱᴀɪʟ ᴛʜᴇ ʜɪɢʜ ꜱᴇᴀꜱ

54716 readers
219 users here now

⚓ Dedicated to the discussion of digital piracy, including ethical problems and legal advancements.

Rules • Full Version

1. Posts must be related to the discussion of digital piracy

2. Don't request invites, trade, sell, or self-promote

3. Don't request or link to specific pirated titles, including DMs

4. Don't submit low-quality posts, be entitled, or harass others



Loot, Pillage, & Plunder

📜 c/Piracy Wiki (Community Edition):


💰 Please help cover server costs.

Ko-Fi Liberapay
Ko-fi Liberapay

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 17 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Morgikan@lemm.ee 22 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Ethical piracy is not watching Tom Cruise movies.

[–] ultratiem@lemmy.ca 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] WeirdGoesPro@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You are just a bunch of PTS’s who are at risk of becoming SP’s for not trying to KSW. /s

[–] ultratiem@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 year ago

Laughs uncontrollably

[–] Fiivemacs@lemmy.ca 11 points 1 year ago (4 children)

If any movie has that Scientology nutcase in them, I won't watch it

[–] Blackadder@lemm.ee 26 points 1 year ago (2 children)

If you watch a pirated movie, he does not earn a dime off you.

[–] YeetPics@mander.xyz 2 points 1 year ago

Same if you don't watch a pirated movie tho 🤷‍♂️

[–] WeirdGoesPro@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 year ago

This is one of those really rare cases where you shouldn’t seed to 1:1.

[–] theKalash@feddit.ch 18 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Why not? He might be an asshole, but he's a damn good actor.

[–] neshura@bookwormstory.social 10 points 1 year ago

Prpbably the chain of reasoning OP follows:

Watch Movie -> Studio gets Money -> Tom Cruise gets Money -> Tom Cruise donates Scientology Money

I understand why they wouldn't spend money on it, not watching it entirely is then just a more extreme form of this where you also don't contribute to public interest in the movie

[–] Fiivemacs@lemmy.ca 6 points 1 year ago

I don't even find him to be a good actor, too generic and cookie cutter. Not my cup of tea. I watch movie es to see different characters, not him doing the same thing. He WAS good, but all his more recent stuff is just the same role with a different name.

[–] Gazumi@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago

Whilst all religions have bad actors, Scientology is a masterclass of bad actors. A bad Christian, Jew, Bhuddist etc., is clearly an outlier and doesn't represent a faithfull. Scientolgoy charges fee's to be a ranked member and has BS tech devices. As a whole, Scientology has bad eggs baked in across the board

[–] artaxadepressedhorse@lemmyngs.social 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

And followers of other world religions aren't nutcases? Your boycott list must be wrapped around the block.

[–] Fiivemacs@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 year ago

Does it really bother you that I think he's a terrible actor and used religion as another reasoning..

My boycott list is huge though..yeah. Walmart's even on it

[–] MomoTimeToDie@sh.itjust.works 6 points 1 year ago

TIL people still give enough of a fuck to complain about Tom cruise

[–] Noxvento@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Yeah had pretty good quality. Watched it yesterday.

[–] KinglyWeevil@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 1 year ago

This one basically had the same plot as the heist episode of Rick and Morty