this post was submitted on 01 Jul 2023
2674 points (94.2% liked)

Malicious Compliance

19593 readers
2 users here now

People conforming to the letter, but not the spirit, of a request. For now, this includes text posts, images, videos and links. Please ensure that the “malicious compliance” aspect is apparent - if you’re making a text post, be sure to explain this part; if it’s an image/video/link, use the “Body” field to elaborate.

======

======

Also check out the following communities:

!fakehistoryporn@lemmy.world !unethicallifeprotips@lemmy.world

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
(page 6) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Fitik@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago

That's kinda genius ngl, even tho I'm pretty sure it's only applies to creative professions

[–] VictoriousStalemate@lemm.ee 0 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Bad example. The cases where businesses could refuse service to a customer were due to religious freedoms guaranteed by the Constitution. Not liking Trump would not fall under that category. Not sure about the other example though.

In general though, I think this would be fine. As long as this business is not funded or supported by taxpayer money.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] itadakimasu@lemmy.world -2 points 1 year ago

Ugh should have read "no sales to trump supporters or religious nutbags. Whoops those 2 are the same thing"

[–] x4740N@lemmy.world -2 points 1 year ago

The more I see news about the United States the less I'm surprised

[–] Billy_Gnosis@lemmy.world -3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I don't have an issue with any of this. Private Business owners can sell their products or services to whoever they want. Don't see what the big deal is. If you don't like it, there's plenty more competition willing to take your money.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›