57
all 13 comments
sorted by: hot top new old
[-] Gregg@lemm.ee 82 points 1 year ago

JD Vance killed Pope Francis. I know there’s no proof, but I’m going to say it anyway. Like JD I can also just make shit up with zero evidence.

[-] AmidFuror@fedia.io 22 points 1 year ago

I heard Vance ate the Pope's cat.

[-] BlueLineBae@midwest.social 11 points 1 year ago

JD Vance prefers his steak boiled pass it on

[-] AmidFuror@fedia.io 2 points 1 year ago
[-] ijedi1234@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 year ago

I saw him do it! With my own two eyes! Vance snuck up behind the Pope, and shanked him like this!

[-] foggy@lemmy.world 39 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

One of the last things the Pope ever said was that JD Vance is commiting a grave sin.

So, hope he has fun with that memory as his Christian Nationalist Brain fades out of life.

[-] Hylactor@sopuli.xyz 7 points 1 year ago
[-] foggy@lemmy.world 15 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

https://www.thedailybeast.com/pope-snubs-vance-and-gets-deputy-to-lecture-vp-on-compassion/

Pope Francis has repeatedly rebuked the president’s mass deportation effort, calling it a “disgrace” and a “grave sin.”

-April 20th 2025

[-] vegeta@lemmy.world 24 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

The pope saw JD try to hump his couch, and became so stressed out at the sight of it that he had a stroke which led to heart failure.

[-] Darthpub@fedia.io 22 points 1 year ago

What ever you have to say about the pope, that’s fine but no one deserves jd Vance as one of the last of anything you talk to before you die.

[-] arsenyv@lemmy.world 11 points 1 year ago

Calling JD Vance a leader is being generous.

[-] santa@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 year ago

Vance is a leader…?

this post was submitted on 21 Apr 2025
57 points (85.2% liked)

politics

30937 readers
2578 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles. Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to US politics and contain quality and original content. Social Media adjacent hosts like Substack are allowed, but ONLY if they tie back to a company/subsidiary. No personal or friend group blogs and no self-promotion. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and re-hosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing other users of being bots or paid actors.
  3. No memes, trolling, misinformation, or low-effort posts/comments (including reposts). If you see posts like this that anger you, do not engage. Report, block, and live a happier life than they do. Any slap-fight is subject to comment removals. Fights full of rule violations will result in temporary bans to cool off.
  4. No manipulating votes via bots or alt accounts; this will result in permanent bans. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in an account ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be permanently banned.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules and use critical thinking when reading, posting, and commenting. Users that repeatedly have comments or posts removed, weaponize reports, or violate the code of conduct, will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users. The reason(s) behind moderator action(s) are publicly available through the Modlog.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS