this post was submitted on 01 Jul 2023
118 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

29 readers
2 users here now

This magazine is dedicated to discussions on the latest developments, trends, and innovations in the world of technology. Whether you are a tech enthusiast, a developer, or simply curious about the latest gadgets and software, this is the place for you. Here you can share your knowledge, ask questions, and engage in discussions on topics such as artificial intelligence, robotics, cloud computing, cybersecurity, and more. From the impact of technology on society to the ethical considerations of new technologies, this category covers a wide range of topics related to technology. Join the conversation and let's explore the ever-evolving world of technology together!

founded 2 years ago
 

Alef Aeronautics' 'Model A' has a driving range of 200 miles and a flight range of 110 miles. The company plans to start delivering cars by late 2025.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] clb92@kbin.social 45 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You know what it also is? A purely theoretical 3D rendered vehicle that doesn't exist.

[–] Ragnell@kbin.social 26 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)

The company, founded in 2015 by Dukhovny, Konstantin Kisly, Pavel Markin, Oleg Petrov in Palo Alto, California, has been test driving and flying the car's prototype since 2019.

"The constraints were: it has to be a real car (driving in driving lanes, parking in parking spaces), it has to have a vertical takeoff (otherwise it is not a real flying car), it has to be affordable for most people (not just the rich)," Alef said.

The following year, the first sub-scale prototype was built, and in 2018, the first full-size “skeleton” took to the skies.

It's for real this time. Whether or not it will be a Tesla lemon, time will tell. But the FAA is generally EXTREMELY safety-conscious.

[–] blazera@kbin.social 25 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Cool, wheres that footage?

[–] Ragnell@kbin.social 8 points 1 year ago

Guess we'll see. I don't have 300k to throw away getting one.

[–] Zorque@kbin.social 13 points 1 year ago

I remember a video we watched in an engineering class back in the early 2000s about a guy who was making "flying cars" that were tested and "flyable".

They still don't have a practical prototype.

[–] clb92@kbin.social 8 points 1 year ago

There's a suspicious lack of real photos and video of this soon-to-be-ready vehicle that's set to ship to consumers in just 2½ years. Surely they're not still in the very early R&D phase, right?

The best actual photos I can find is of an oversized drone with a basic frame the size of a car, a "cockpit" in the middle that will barely fit 1 person, 8 propellers where the entire "car" would normally be in a car, and some light-weight foam side panels slapped on. No car engine or car wheels (except some small castors to roll it around).

Along with the (paraphrasing) "it's supposed to be a slow-moving vehicle while on the ground" comment in the article, I guess they're building a big drone with a small lawn mower motor to move you around on the ground.

[–] UziBobuzi@kbin.social 32 points 1 year ago (2 children)

What could possibly go wrong? (everything)

[–] bluGill@kbin.social 15 points 1 year ago (3 children)

There are strict rules about flying. If it is an airplane then you need pilots license, which involves a lot of training. I'm comfortable with someone who has a pilots license having one, but it isn't easy to get a pilots license and you need to follow strict rules of where you can fly. Large parts of most cities have complex rules on where you are allowed to fly, so most trips will not be practical in the city as you can't get close to where you want to go.

Either that or it is an ultralight, which doesn't need a pilots license, but has strict rules on where you can fly (no cities, or something like that), and even stricter max power rules, also pilot only no passengers.

Either way, it is only practical if you are a farmer, fly to inspect your fields, then fly to the nearest 'big' city for shopping. (Big city may be 30k people). The slow ground speed and limited flying area makes it a toy for most people, not 'practical transport .

The above assumes that it actually goes on sale, that is not a scam.

[–] lemonflavoured@kbin.social 3 points 1 year ago

If it works then I can see it being used how you say. I'm ... skeptical (at best) that it will work though.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] ExpensiveConstant@kbin.social 19 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Will you also need a pilots license to purchase? I wonder where you would even be allowed to transition from driving to flying...

[–] swope@kbin.social 15 points 1 year ago

If you drive too far forward in a parking space and grind on the parking block, or someone dings your door, do you need an A&P to repair it?

[–] Lantech@kbin.social 11 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Driving down the highway, hit a traffic jam. Don't even slow down just go airborne over the jam.

[–] numbscroll@kbin.social 14 points 1 year ago (3 children)

@Lantech

@Ragnell @ExpensiveConstant

Aside from the $300k price tag, sadly….

The car will be a Low Speed Vehicle, meaning it won’t go faster than about 25 miles per hour on a paved surface. If a driver needs a faster route, they will be able to use the vehicle's flight capabilities, according to Alef.

[–] Hellsadvocate@kbin.social 15 points 1 year ago

People's driving senses are so fucking bad, I can't imagine them flying. It'll be in the news often I guess "car crashes into building while trying to back up." "car flies into power lines thousands without power" well I guess that's fairly typical already.

[–] assbutt@kbin.social 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

What the hell is the point of a car that can't do more than 25 mph? This thing can fucking fly, but it's as capable as a golf cart on the ground?

I'll believe this when it actually exists (the thing they're promising, not a skeletal prototype), and I'll believe that the FAA is cool with flying cars when I see them on my commute. None of this currently passes the bullshit check.

[–] TheDeadGuy@kbin.social 5 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I imagine that it's supposed to be flown and is only temporarily used on the ground. Same way airplanes don't have a higher ground speed

[–] iAmTheTot@kbin.social 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Airplanes have a plenty high ground speed. They gotta go pretty dang fast for take off. ;)

[–] TheDeadGuy@kbin.social 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Lol ok true, I meant more of a maneuvering at speed. Even then, thinking about it my analogy is terrible :/

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] deaconblue@kbin.social 5 points 1 year ago (5 children)

I think it's mostly an expensive toy. They made it VTOL so it does not have to go fast enough on the ground to become airborne. That's ok, it doesn't need a runway to take off, but VTOL is way to make things fly that really have no business flying. Airplanes have a certain shape because they have to. This thing looks like a bar of soap in comparison. I'm sure it uses a ton of energy to stay airborne, it would have the glide coefficient of a rock.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] agamemnonymous@kbin.social 10 points 1 year ago (1 children)

What about insurance flying low over populated regions? Air traffic control? I don't think the physical flying capability is the problem with flying cars

[–] Ragnell@kbin.social 3 points 1 year ago

It'll probably use VFR rules, like a helicopter. I'm thinking the target is rich guys who eventually get pilot licenses.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Perrin42@kbin.social 17 points 1 year ago

"Approved by the FAA" is overstaying things a bit. The only thing they were approved for was testing; there's a lot of road (pun intended) between that and certification.

[–] gravitywell@kbin.social 9 points 1 year ago

I bet these will sell like NFTs, and be just as useful.

[–] _I_@kbin.social 7 points 1 year ago

It's also the first flying car (fully electric!) to kill 15 people when it crashes into a duplex.

[–] DarkThoughts@kbin.social 6 points 1 year ago

Yeah, no way that thing is real.

BREAKING NEWS! Flying car piloted by CEO Jetson Bankroll and 5 others crash into the Empire State Building! Over 2000 people reported dead or injured, passengers still missing and efforts to find them in the rubble are underway.

[–] 1chemistdown@kbin.social 5 points 1 year ago

I don’t even trust people in the current two dimensions they drive in, why in the fuck would I want them in a third dimension. Seems like a bad idea.

[–] Spaceman2901@kbin.social 4 points 1 year ago

People can’t navigate safely in two dimensions, and y’all want to add a third?

[–] AnonymousLlama@kbin.social 4 points 1 year ago

People can barely drive in 2D, let alone manage 3D travel

[–] magnetosphere@kbin.social 3 points 1 year ago

According to the article, it’s available for preorder. Hmmm.

If I worked for that company, I’d be strongly tempted to “borrow” that preorder list. After all, it’s basically a directory of rich people who also happen to be imbeciles. I have zero experience in running scams, but considering how easy the targets are, I think I’d be successful anyway.

load more comments
view more: next ›