What party is this guy in? I've searched and not one article or website says, unless I've missed it.
... we can guess...
Oh believe me, I have lol. But i wanted proof too.
Well he's said he represents the "first progressive black voting block" so I doubt he's a MAGAt. Either way he's a smarmy politician and your enemy. Like cops, the corporate upper crust, and the investor class. They are all the enemy class regardless of party.
That explains why they got indicted for it.
Thanks.
Could you post where you for that info from?
Thanks! I see it.
What does that mean? I can't find any reference to it. Is it some form of political terminology which I'm maybe just unfamiliar with?
It's political jargon used to sway voters
Hm. Sway in what way? Are there other candidates or organizations which use terms like these? I didn't see anything come up.
It's the progressive part. If you want the progressive vote you present yourself as progressive. If he wanted the conservative vote he would have used the word conservative. Black people in America tend to vote liberal/progressive so he's throwing his net where he will catch the most voters. Now is he really progressive? I don't know. He's a snake in the grass to me until he can prove otherwise with actions. The benefit of the doubt for politicians is why we are in the position we are in.
Thank you, i missed that.
When it comes to small, local elections party affiliation may have no ties to the national parties. Challengers may run as "this" party because the incumbent is "that" party. The mayor of my town was a Democrat but used all of the propaganda buzz works from Fox News' playback. That being said I'll bet the mayor in this story is a Trump supporter
He's a Democrat, but this is not a simple situation.
Judge rules someone ineligible, mayor disagree
Sheriff's show up to candidates house, possible intimidation
Haven't read much else yet
How strange. Sheriff's never seem to show up at conservative homes like this.
Most local governments in America are "officially" non-partisan.
Edit: I'm not wrong 🤷♂️
What city do you live in? Every person that I've ever seen run for office was always in a party.
I'm sure they were affiliated and financially supported by a party, and some municipalities do run partisan elections, but "mayoral elections are officially nonpartisan in most of the nation's largest cities", insofar as party affiliation is not listed on the ballot. I'm sure mayoral candidate party affiliations are well-known/easily determined in big cities, but in small towns like the one I grew up in, the info isn't necessarily there and there's not necessarily anyone even looking for it.
Party affiliation of the mayors of the 100 largest cities:
Democratic 65
Republican 25
...From that article.
Your reading comprehension isn't as good as you think it is, I addressed that already.
Ok dude. 👍
Election ≠ Candidate
Make sense?
Ok guy, sure thing buddy. You win shit hole dive towns aren't political somehow in your world. that's fine.
Bro, this isn't an opinion and that's a massive misrepresentation of my comments. Obviously city elections are "political", obviously candidates are affiliated with parties based on their personal beliefs and intentions, but that doesn't change the fact that objectively, most city election ballots don't include party affiliation information. Someone was wondering why they couldn't find that information and I simply offered a possible explanation. Sorry reality seems to have hurt your feelings, idk what else to tell you 🤷♂️
Mayoral elections, and many city elections, are generally non partisan.
So while the candidate may be a Republican or a Democrat, they aren't running AS a Republican or Democrat, and the party affiliation is not mentioned on the ballot.
Here's the ballot for mayor of Portland, Oregon in 2024, ranked choice, vote for up to 6. Keith Wilson won.

Nope. Not even close.
Edit: They may be nonpartisan somewhere but nowhere near a significant amount of them are.
-source: raised in small town America, lived in 4 states, and spent decades traveling the country
I have real sources in other replies, don't feel like repeating them again to you now, sorry
So far. I've seen this about it:
Appeals Court panel orders Camilla council members to be removed from office
A stated investigation is said to have found neither slept at night in the addresses they were registered to for "at least three months".
It doesn't go into much other detail though.
politics
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles. Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:

- Articles must be relevant to US politics and contain quality and original content. Social Media adjacent hosts like Substack are allowed, but ONLY if they tie back to a company/subsidiary. No personal or friend group blogs and no self-promotion. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and re-hosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing other users of being bots or paid actors.
- No memes, trolling, misinformation, or low-effort posts/comments (including reposts). If you see posts like this that anger you, do not engage. Report, block, and live a happier life than they do. Any slap-fight is subject to comment removals. Fights full of rule violations will result in temporary bans to cool off.
- No manipulating votes via bots or alt accounts; this will result in permanent bans. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in an account ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be permanently banned.
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules and use critical thinking when reading, posting, and commenting. Users that repeatedly have comments or posts removed, weaponize reports, or violate the code of conduct, will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users. The reason(s) behind moderator action(s) are publicly available through the Modlog.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News