this post was submitted on 05 Jul 2023
340 points (82.3% liked)

Technology

59575 readers
3615 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Will people here use/try Meta's #threads when available? Would love to know the reasons or if it would be just for fun/curiosity.

The amount of data collected is insane imo.

(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Hypersapien@lemmy.world 15 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I'm torn between "Fuck no!" and "What? Seriously?"

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] CaptObvious@lemmy.world 15 points 1 year ago

Nope. I have a barely-used Instagram account from before the sale to Facebook. I keep it in hopes that, someday, a regulator will force them to sell IG or spin it off. I have zero interest in having anything else to do with Facebook or any of its subsidiaries.

[–] elltee@lemmy.one 14 points 1 year ago

That's gonna be a no from me, dawg.

[–] speaker_hat@lemmy.one 14 points 1 year ago

No, bye Zuck.

[–] scarabic@lemmy.world 14 points 1 year ago

Fuck no. I need fewer Meta apps in my life, not more.

[–] tejrik@lemmy.sdf.org 13 points 1 year ago

I hate to think that it might gain popularity with the Crowd trying to leave Twitter. I certainly don't plan on trying it. I have several friends that think Bluesky or Thread will be a good move after Twitter, but I can't see either option being good for the userbase long term.

[–] Knightfox@lemmy.one 13 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I think the idea of it is pretty smart, Instagram probably has a lot of shared users with Twitter. If the quality of Twitter decreases then Instagram making a competitor seems like an easy win, especially if the issues plaguing Twitter aren't plaguing Instagram. The privacy concerns due to required permissions are probably the most concerning, but if you were using Twitter and Instagram you're probably not even considering that.

I'm definitely not going to try it, but I kinda hope Twitter completely busts at this point. Elon's next autobiography is going to be, "The Art of the Deal 2: How I won by losing $44 Billion."

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] zephyrvs@lemmy.ml 13 points 1 year ago

Not touching that, nope.

[–] dab@lemmy.world 13 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Nah, giving all my personal data to Meta for an account I’d hardly use doesn’t seem worth it.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] kyle1320@lemmy.world 13 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Will I use it? Absolutely not.

Do I hope that it gets used by others? Yeah, at least a bit. Because if Meta assigns more engineers to work on fedi tech like improving ActivityPub that would be a huge win for the fediverse in general. That assumes they actually contribute to open source, but Meta/FB actually has a reasonable track record there.

[–] loofkid@lemmy.loof.life 13 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I’d agree, except for this: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Embrace,_extend,_and_extinguish

Seems more likely that they’ll end up harming the fediverse before they improve things for us.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] rschecht@lemm.live 13 points 1 year ago

Never. Just look what data they collect.

[–] WarmSoda@lemm.ee 13 points 1 year ago
[–] obinice@lemmy.world 13 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Meta is just Facebook trying to hide their awful reputation under a new name. I will never call them Meta.

I'll be damned if I'm going to use any more of their spy products than I have to, too.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] ren@lemmy.world 12 points 1 year ago (13 children)

Yes! BUTTTTT I have a master plan!!!

HERE ME OUT!

I'm on Instagram and have a bunch of followers, around 200K.

SO - My plan is to squat as the IG users pick up Threads. Most people will just follow the same people from IG (Meta encourages it and it fills your feed fast).

My follower count on Threads should grow just from that alone, right?

THEN - Facebook finally federates, right?

THEN! Facebook allows for account migration to Mastodon.

First..... I migrate my @renwillis@mstdn.social account to Threads.

Finally.... Immediately migrate all my followers from Threads back to mstdn.social.

Suddenly potentially 200K are following a Mastodon account!!! MWUH-HAHAHAHAHAAAAA!!!!!

load more comments (13 replies)
[–] CavalierBob@lemmy.world 12 points 1 year ago
[–] DriftKaiser@lemmy.world 12 points 1 year ago

Hell no. Facebook got worse since they shoved every useless ads and recommended posts to your own face.

[–] Holyhandgrenade@lemmy.world 12 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I don't know why you'd switch from the clusterfuck that is Twitter to anything made by Meta, one of the worst tech companies out there. It's like trading a turd for a piece of shit.
Mastodon is the only reasonable alternative IMO, the only problem is that not enough people are on there.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] dbilitated@aussie.zone 12 points 1 year ago (3 children)

no definitely not installing it or opening an account.

I'm not against federation tho, I'd be in favour of showing people you can get all the same content through another channel. defederating means that people will have to use it if there's content from someone they like on there. I don't want to give people a reason to install that shit.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] thirstyhyena@lemmy.world 11 points 1 year ago

I have a FB acct for work reasons, while I have no interest in Threads, there's no guarantee that I won't end up using Threads for work reasons.

[–] Myro@lemm.ee 11 points 1 year ago

Nope. Meta's business practices are cancer.

[–] Kolanaki@yiffit.net 11 points 1 year ago
[–] fxl@lemmy.world 11 points 1 year ago
[–] roxby@lemmy.world 11 points 1 year ago

Twitter never made sense to me, so threads won't either.

[–] Saneless@lemmy.world 11 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Nope. I haven't logged in to Fuckerbergs's shit over the last 2 years, not about to start now

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] ChilledFlames@lemmy.world 11 points 1 year ago

Nah, don't want meta to collect even more data about me than before.

[–] ccreamsonn@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago

I made a promise to myself stay away from Facebook as much as possible. (Pretty hard to do here in SEA)

[–] Alperto@lemmy.ml 10 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

After reading another post where it was shown all the private information the app requires, I’ll never even be close to it (a quick resume: location, device information, user profiles on other apps, payment information, even health information).

Edit: found a link (it’s a meme, but the screenshot shows what i’m referring to): https://lemm.ee/post/653305

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Sweetroll789@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago

Big fat no from me. I don’t want to see ads in my sleep.

[–] Gruntyfish@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago

Absolutely not

[–] realZiggyRed@vlemmy.net 10 points 1 year ago

I'm staying away from anything relating to Meta/Facebook

[–] Marxine@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago

I wouldn't join even if paid to do so.

I'd take the money and scram.

[–] Tebza255@lemm.ee 9 points 1 year ago
[–] Rhoeri@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago

Absolutely not.

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›