this post was submitted on 05 Jul 2023
725 points (97.4% liked)

Memes

45746 readers
1525 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 
(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] TheFrirish@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Lonely? I never felt such a sense of communality than here

[–] ruck_feddit@lemmy.ml 8 points 1 year ago

I feel the same. I have real conversations and get real answers, without some annoying moderator or karmabot inserting themselves and stopping the discourse

[–] Jerosh@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Damn… I did not know Threads was going to be part of the fediverse. I only just found this unspoiled corner of the internet, I’d like it to stay as is please!

[–] MrFagtron9000@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago

You're delusional.

The fediverse stuff is just a bullet point on a sales sheet, Facebook doesn't give a shit about federating with Lemmy or Mastodon or whatever.

The reason they don't give a shit is they already have a user base that is multiple times larger than Lemmy and Mastodon combined. Also normal people don't even know what those things are. My mom doesn't know what Mastodon is, she does know what Twitter and threads is.

[–] MiddleWeigh@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago

I been gone for 3 days and I missed the drama! Awwww

[–] boopdepop@lemmy.fmhy.ml 4 points 1 year ago (6 children)

Which movie is this from? I can't seem to remember it

[–] oscar_falke@sopuli.xyz 5 points 1 year ago

Narcos, a TV show about the Colombian drug war and Pablo Escobar.

[–] shadeless@discuss.tchncs.de 4 points 1 year ago

Narcos I think

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] teawrecks@sopuli.xyz 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I think fediverse servers should adopt a set of sustainable limits for themselves, one of which should be: do not maintain more than X active users. If they have over that amount, they should shut down signups. If they don't shut down signups, everyone else should defederate them until they cooperate.

[–] asterfield@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)

This is a really good idea. Maybe someone can make a site called “Too powerful” that lists the bloated instances or something.

However: I’m not super deep into lemmy architecture, but what would stop the instance ops from creating a “sister instance” the the same rules and owners?

[–] teawrecks@sopuli.xyz 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

I think that should be considered willful subversion of the fediverse "tenates" which wouldn't be condoned. Sure, people could always do it in secret, but if they were ever exposed it would be grounds for defederation.

Designing said tenates would take lots of open discussion from the community, but I do think it is important if we're going to maintain a working fediverse. Corporations like Google and msft have embraced/extended/extinguished open platforms in the past, and it looks like meta is trying the same thing again. If we say "the platform is open, everything is allowed, anyone is welcome, the fediverse will sort itself out" then it will inevitably be dismantled by organized attacks on the platform.

The fediverse is both the technical architecture, and the decentralized culture of the people using it.

[–] asterfield@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Hopefully we’ve collectively seen EEE enough to guard against it this time

[–] teawrecks@sopuli.xyz 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I hope so too, but...I wouldn't count on it. It's really interesting thinking about the nature of the internet/fediverse as it relates to human civilization. It's apparent why holy texts and totalitarian monarchies were beneficial for past societies to whip people into line and make things work. The fediverse doesn't have a central govt, it feels more libertarian right now. It's hearding cats. I think we need a fediverse version of "the federalist papers" to define how instances should cooperate to sustain itself.

The reality is, the internet was already federated. From the birth of the WWW everyone was able to make their own website and connect to a decentralized network. And look at what happened: corporations took over, everything became centralized, and users became the products.

If we sit idly by and think the fediverse will always sustain itself, I'm convinced the day will come when it won't.

[–] StantonVitales@beehaw.org 3 points 1 year ago

Oh man, this is genuinely depressing. I just checked it out for the first time and almost every thread I see is "omg this is so much better than twitter" "Guess we're all on threads now?" and just complete lack of awareness of the fediverse at all, and I'm just sitting here like "the fediverse has been better than twitter...and facebook....and instagram... and reddit.... for a long time now....." but everyone is just gonna throw flowers at Facebook for making a hackneyed handicapped version of it and there's nothing we can do.

This time next year everywhere you see little social media buttons and links the threads symbol will be there by default and people will still have no idea about Lemmy or Mastadon. I'm gonna try really hard to focus on how much of a good thing that is because of its lessening of the horrors of Eternal September in these spaces.

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›