329
submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by Davriellelouna@lemmy.world to c/politics@lemmy.world
all 26 comments
sorted by: hot top new old
[-] wirebeads@lemmy.ca 89 points 1 year ago

Trump is a loser and rapes women and young girls.

Release the Epstein files, you king of deflection.

[-] JeeBaiChow@lemmy.world 78 points 1 year ago

Watch both sides vote it down

[-] verdantbanana@lemmy.world 38 points 1 year ago

Democrats will claim it was the Republicans fault when they do vote it down

[-] scott@lemmy.org 19 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Yeah they coulda done this 4 years ago if they wanted

[-] some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org 48 points 1 year ago

Pelosi said she strongly supports the bill and looks forward to voting for it.

"I already made a fortune through my husband's trading on my insider info, so I'm all for this now."

Disingenuous. But I'll take good legislation even if it's late.

[-] Asafum@feddit.nl 34 points 1 year ago

If only maga were exposed to this kind of news maybe they'd finally recognize what a corrupt piece of shit Trump is....

...But who am I kidding of course they wouldn't, they'd move the goalpost and somehow say Pelosi bad and Trump good all in the same sentence.

[-] Kirp123@lemmy.world 31 points 1 year ago

They literally carved out a special exemption for Trump in this law. What is he even complaining about?

Guess it's never enough for orange in charge.

[-] TranscendentalEmpire@lemmy.today 35 points 1 year ago

GOP senators had been working with the White House on the stock trade bill, and some supported a broad carve-out to exclude the president from the ban, but it failed, with Hawley joining Democrats to block it.

Looks like the carve out failed because Hawley and Democrats blocked it. That's probably why he's actually upset with Hawley. Tbh I'd be fine with the carve out of it actually helped the bill pass, it's not like trump really has any qualms with breaking the law.

[-] TheGoldenV@lemmy.org 3 points 1 year ago

Thanks for the good news!

[-] Kirp123@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

Ok I saw an article where they were talking about the carve-out but I hadn't seen yet that it failed. Good on them for not taking that shit.

[-] Tolookah@discuss.tchncs.de 3 points 1 year ago
[-] Kirp123@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

Hopefully that black shriveled thing he calls a heart gives up and we don't have to endure more. I was really hoping with the whole Epstein thing it may happen but I guess not.

[-] AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

As we have seen with Dick Cheney, they can just give him a new one. I would hope for an aneurysm, but I suspect a braindead Trump being puppeted with some sort of implant chip, and controlled by a first gen LLM, might be more coherent than he currently is.

[-] slothrop@lemmy.ca 16 points 1 year ago

On his way to the White House later today.

[-] resipsaloquitur@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)
[-] devolution@lemmy.world 14 points 1 year ago

Trump, Hawley is one of the reasons your insurrection even happened. You might wanna be grateful… oh wait, it’s Trump.

Diaper Don Tiny Dick Trump

[-] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 13 points 1 year ago
[-] NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io 7 points 1 year ago

I mean smh, imagine a self-respecting Republican naming an act after pedophile man-eater Satan Pelosi.

[-] taiyang@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago

Hawley for once not being a compete dickbag. Obviously the orange one doesn't want to lose his ability to manipulate markets and enrich his cronies in congress, but what does Hawley get out of it?

[-] peregrin5@piefed.social 6 points 1 year ago

it's the fake bone they throw to their idiot voter base once in a while knowing it will never pass. Trump just didn't get the memo (or more likely, can't read the memo).

[-] rhvg@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago
[-] taiyang@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

By upsetting his very MAGA base?

Josh: B-b-but I made sure to lick the boot clean this time!

[-] Lexam@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

Second Tier? Damn that's a compliment.

[-] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

This kind of thing polls even better than releasing all the Epstein files.

Figures that Taco is butthurt about it.

this post was submitted on 31 Jul 2025
329 points (99.4% liked)

politics

31022 readers
1578 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles. Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to US politics and contain quality and original content. Social Media adjacent hosts like Substack are allowed, but ONLY if they tie back to a company/subsidiary. No personal or friend group blogs and no self-promotion. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and re-hosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing other users of being bots or paid actors.
  3. No memes, trolling, misinformation, or low-effort posts/comments (including reposts). If you see posts like this that anger you, do not engage. Report, block, and live a happier life than they do. Any slap-fight is subject to comment removals. Fights full of rule violations will result in temporary bans to cool off.
  4. No manipulating votes via bots or alt accounts; this will result in permanent bans. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in an account ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be permanently banned.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules and use critical thinking when reading, posting, and commenting. Users that repeatedly have comments or posts removed, weaponize reports, or violate the code of conduct, will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users. The reason(s) behind moderator action(s) are publicly available through the Modlog.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS