this post was submitted on 25 Oct 2023
46 points (96.0% liked)

[Dormant] Electric Vehicles

3193 readers
1 users here now

We have moved to:

!electricvehicles@slrpnk.net

A community for the sharing of links, news, and discussion related to Electric Vehicles.

Rules

  1. No bigotry - including racism, sexism, ableism, casteism, speciesism, homophobia, transphobia, or xenophobia.
  2. Be respectful, especially when disagreeing. Everyone should feel welcome here.
  3. No self-promotion.
  4. No irrelevant content. All posts must be relevant and related to plug-in electric vehicles — BEVs or PHEVs.
  5. No trolling.
  6. Policy, not politics. Submissions and comments about effective policymaking are allowed and encouraged in the community, however conversations and submissions about parties, politicians, and those devolving into general tribalism will be removed.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 10 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] treadful@lemmy.zip 21 points 1 year ago (1 children)

If they weren't all $70k+ and the ugliest things on the road, maybe they'd do better.

[–] LemmyIsFantastic@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Rivians and lightning are doing just fine. If had nothing to do with being 70k. Those cars and trucks are straight up middle class buys that are popular.

[–] NotMyOldRedditName@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I wouldn't say lightning are doing fine.

They cut an entire shift with rolling layoffs (1 shift is laid off at a time and it cycles through all shifts) and inventory is building.

There trying to respond to the problem to equal it out, but fine isn't the word I'd use.

[–] ch00f@lemmy.world 16 points 1 year ago (1 children)

That’s odd. Maybe if they spent some of their Super Bowl ad money on actually making the vehicles, they’d be in better shape.

[–] reddig33@lemmy.world 19 points 1 year ago

They were too busy cancelling and then un-cancelling their only EV that actually sold in reasonable quantities.

[–] Jode@midwest.social 11 points 1 year ago (3 children)

It absolutely boggles the fucking mind that none of these genius CEOs have been pushing for a electric Ford maverick sized pickup after seeing the runaway success that has been. Doubly now seeing that sales of the lightning have plateaud. But I guess none of them want to be the first ones to prove the point that you can build a good reasonably sized useful electric car and make money on it if you are willing to take a hair less margin on each one.

[–] AA5B@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

GM always claimed they couldn’t make a mid-sized pickup because current regulations require the smaller vehicle to be efficient. This was their chance

[–] dynamojoe@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

If they came out with an EV Maverick I'd be thrilled. I have a Model 3 right now mainly because I can't afford an EV pickup truck that actually exists (don't get me started on the Lightning's "Pro" trim).

[–] LemmyIsFantastic@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago

Trucks are on a 5 year life cycle. The lightning was first, followed up by PHEV 150. The rest will follow in a few years.

[–] rockitude@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago

They are just handing the industry over to the pure-play EV makers. Which is fine with me, they are the best at what they do.