559

You might not even like rsync. Yeah it's old. Yeah it's slow. But if you're working with Linux you're going to need to know it.

In this video I walk through my favorite everyday flags for rsync.

Support the channel:
https://patreon.com/VeronicaExplains
https://ko-fi.com/VeronicaExplains
https://thestopbits.bandcamp.com/

Here's a companion blog post, where I cover a bit more detail: https://vkc.sh/everyday-rsync

Also, @BreadOnPenguins made an awesome rsync video and you should check it out: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eifQI5uD6VQ

Lastly, I left out all of the ssh setup stuff because I made a video about that and the blog post goes into a smidge more detail. If you want to see a video covering the basics of using SSH, I made one a few years ago and it's still pretty good: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3FKsdbjzBcc

Chapters:
1:18 Invoking rsync
4:05 The --delete flag for rsync
5:30 Compression flag: -z
6:02 Using tmux and rsync together
6:30 but Veronica... why not use (insert shiny object here)

(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top new old
[-] MangoPenguin@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 10 months ago

Surely restic or borg would be better for backups?

Rsync can send files and not delete stuff, but there's no versioning or retention settings.

[-] chronicledmonocle@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago

If you add --delete-before, it absolutely can delete stuff.

[-] MangoPenguin@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 10 months ago

Yeah but then it's not really a good backup!

[-] srjd7cpsmjvja3cyae@lemmy.ml 2 points 10 months ago

Duplicity also works really well for backups and you can encrypt them with your own openpgp key.

https://duplicity.gitlab.io/

load more comments (5 replies)
[-] vga@sopuli.xyz 4 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

It's not bad if you don't need historical backups. I kinda think I do, so I use https://github.com/rustic-rs/rustic becase rust

Restic is probably a better choice if you're not a rust-freak like me.

[-] WolfLink@sh.itjust.works 3 points 10 months ago

I use rsync + ZFS for backups which includes historical backups

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] vext01@lemmy.sdf.org 4 points 10 months ago

I used to use rsnapshot, which is a thin wrapper around rsync to make it incremental, but moved to restic and never looked back. Much easier and encrypted by default.

[-] Xylight@lemdro.id 4 points 10 months ago

rsync for backups? I guess it depends on what kind of backup

for redundant backups of my data and configs that I still have a live copy of, I use restic, it compresses extremely well

I have used rsync to permanently move something to another drive though

[-] Jessica@discuss.tchncs.de 3 points 10 months ago

If you're trying to back up Windows OS drives for some reason, robocopy works quite similarly to rsync.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] portnull@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Maybe I am missing something but how does it handle snapshots?

I use rsync all the time but only for moving data around effectively. But not for backups as it doesn't (AFAIK) hanld snapshots

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] tomkatt@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago

Rsync is great. I’ve been using it to back up my book library from my local Calibre collection to my NAS for years, it’s absurdly simple and convenient. Plus, -ruv lets me ignore unchanged files and backup recursively, and if I clean up locally and need that replicated, just need to add —delete.

[-] BCsven@lemmy.ca 2 points 10 months ago

Grsync is great. Having a GUI can be helpful

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›
this post was submitted on 03 Oct 2025
559 points (97.0% liked)

Selfhosted

61734 readers
709 users here now

A place to share alternatives to popular online services that can be self-hosted without giving up privacy or locking you into a service you don't control.

Rules:

Detailed Rules Post

  1. Be civil.

  2. No spam.

  3. Posts are to be related to self-hosting.

  4. Don't duplicate the full text of your blog or readme if you're providing a link.

  5. Submission headline should match the article title.

  6. No trolling.

  7. Promotion posts require active participation, with an account that is at least 30 days old. F/LOSS without a paywall has exceptions, with requirements. See the rules link for details. Tags [CBH] or [AIP] are required, see the links in Rule 8 for details.

  8. AI-related discussions and AI-involved promotional posts have additional requirements for tagging, as noted in Rule 7 and the AI & Promotional Post Expanded Rules post, and find example disclosures here.

Resources:

Any issues on the community? Report it using the report flag.

Questions? DM the mods!

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS