this post was submitted on 22 Nov 2023
707 points (98.0% liked)

Technology

59675 readers
3221 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Google Chrome will limit ad blockers starting June 2024::The "Manifest V3" rollout is back after letting tensions cool for a year.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Enkers@sh.itjust.works 240 points 1 year ago (6 children)

Firefox users who never left: feeling of smugness intensifies

[–] cybervseas@lemmy.world 59 points 1 year ago

I try not to express or show it though. Only good vibes to bring everyone over to Firefox.

[–] KpntAutismus@lemmy.world 52 points 1 year ago

signature look of superiority

[–] krimson@feddit.nl 47 points 1 year ago (8 children)

I must admit I ditched Firefox for a while when it was considerably slower than Chrome.

feelsbadman.

load more comments (8 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Sterile_Technique@lemmy.world 129 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Google Chrome can suck a dick.

[–] user224@lemmy.sdf.org 72 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Damn, that sounds like a killer feature.

[–] prole@sh.itjust.works 24 points 1 year ago

Yeah, but given the name, I bet Edge does it way better ;)

[–] isVeryLoud@lemmy.ca 14 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

No, it sucks. Killing is illegal.

[–] Thranduil@lemmy.world 14 points 1 year ago

Byt what if it wasnt. Hey vsauce michael here. What is killing and how can it be legal?

[–] Mojojojo1993@lemmy.world 97 points 1 year ago (36 children)

If only there was an alternative. Some kinda fox. A fox that was set aflame

[–] pete_the_cat@lemmy.world 24 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Or, let's say, a weasel frozen in ice

[–] Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world 30 points 1 year ago (1 children)

There's a browser called Glacier Ferret? 🤔

[–] Diabolo96@lemmy.dbzer0.com 44 points 1 year ago (3 children)
[–] Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world 17 points 1 year ago

Why would you apologise for that string of masterpieces? It's marvellous and adorable! Marvorable! Adorallous! Both! 🥰

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (35 replies)
[–] 7u5k3n@lemmy.world 92 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

To abuse a saying...

Best time to be on Firefox? Yesterday.

Second best? Today.

[–] gapbetweenus@feddit.de 75 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Free ad for Firefox. Funny enough can't be blocked by ad blockers.

[–] Seasoned_Greetings@lemm.ee 29 points 1 year ago (12 children)

How long until Google starts paying sites to require chrome? The already tried rolling that concept out a few months ago. They only stopped because of the backlash that was publicly associated with it. They already pay major phone manufacturers to have google as their default or only search option.

So who's going to stop them when we start finding that major popular sites suddenly don't work on firefox?

[–] kzhe@lemm.ee 14 points 1 year ago

Hopefully the EU

[–] r3df0x@7.62x54r.ru 13 points 1 year ago (4 children)

People could start configuring their sites to ban Google Chrome. Give a scary message that says something like "Google Chrome is not allowed on this site for your protection. Google Chrome has severe vulnerabilities that allow for easy infection. An autistic teenager was falsely convicted of selling CP after being infected and now must register for life."

People would switch away from Google Chrome incredibly fast if website owners started posting that.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (10 replies)
[–] Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world 74 points 1 year ago

This, but computer literacy rather than literal literacy

[–] Colorcodedresistor@lemm.ee 53 points 1 year ago (1 children)

title as it should be: 'google did not die a hero, it instead lived long enough to become the villain.'

[–] unreasonabro@lemmy.world 38 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (4 children)

such old news though

google became the villain the moment it decided to become publicly traded and chose to be the internet's ad pimp rather than a search engine

most of us are too young to remember but there was a time when you could search for something obscure and actually find it

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Ch0wW@lemmy.world 50 points 1 year ago (4 children)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] r3df0x@7.62x54r.ru 48 points 1 year ago (3 children)

They're going to burn their own browser. If they stop allowing adblockers, a lot of people are just going to change browsers.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] JackbyDev@programming.dev 46 points 1 year ago (12 children)

Why the hell aren't you on Firefox?

load more comments (12 replies)
[–] nutsack@lemmy.world 44 points 1 year ago (2 children)

google chrome will suck my balls

[–] 0x2d@lemmy.ml 17 points 1 year ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] badbytes@lemmy.world 34 points 1 year ago (5 children)

In other news: Firefox installs are breaking records.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] Cyberflunk@lemmy.world 30 points 1 year ago (10 children)

Never thought this would be the thing that drove me to degoogled myself, but here we are. I put myself back in an apple silo purely out of spite. Converted all my gmails to other services, like hey.com and tutanota, I PAY a search engine now Kagi.com.

They really burned my soul. Fuck Google.

load more comments (10 replies)
[–] TheBlue22@lemmy.blahaj.zone 30 points 1 year ago (4 children)

People keep saying (and corpos keep believing) that normies will just "get used to the ads or pay a premium"

But everybody has a breaking point. People who already dislike it have left chrome or are in the rush to leave. Once people reach this point, they will start asking their more tech savvy friends or the Internet for a better way.

I honestly hope Google will not change its trajectory because sooner or later, people will get fed up with their bullshit.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] ghostdoggtv@lemmy.world 30 points 1 year ago

As if I'll have money for discretionary purchases anyway. Fucking idiots.

[–] FourPacketsOfPeanuts@lemmy.world 30 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Hi Firefox. It's been a while..

[–] nolight@lemm.ee 26 points 1 year ago (13 children)

It shouldn't have been a while

load more comments (13 replies)
[–] tsonfeir@lemm.ee 24 points 1 year ago (20 children)

Everything Google does is evil. How are people still using anything they make—or control the repo for (chromium, android)

[–] ultra@feddit.ro 38 points 1 year ago (9 children)

At least Android actually gives you freedom. What other alternatives (that actually work) are there? I'd rather have a phone with an OS made by an evil corp that I can actually control, than an OS that doesn't even let me install apps not approved by the manufacturer.

load more comments (9 replies)
[–] LemmyIsFantastic@lemmy.world 19 points 1 year ago (3 children)

They make fantastic services that are far more functional than their oss competitors and it's far far less effort than hosting and dealing with that bullshit.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] slipperydippery@lemmy.world 13 points 1 year ago (1 children)

That seems slightly hyperbolic

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (17 replies)
[–] kandoh@reddthat.com 24 points 1 year ago

When making billions isn't enough there is something wrong with you

[–] RandomVideos@programming.dev 21 points 1 year ago (13 children)

Does anyone on lemmy use chrome?

load more comments (13 replies)
[–] time_fo_that@lemmy.world 17 points 1 year ago (5 children)
load more comments (5 replies)
[–] autotldr@lemmings.world 16 points 1 year ago

This is the best summary I could come up with:


A year later, Google is restarting the phase-out schedule, and while it has changed some things, Chrome will eventually be home to inferior filtering extensions.

Google's blog post says the plan to kill Manifest V2, the current format for Chrome extensions, is back on starting June 2024.

The company says: "We expect it will take at least a month to observe and stabilize the changes in pre-stable before expanding the rollout to stable channel Chrome, where it will also gradually roll out over time.

On the high end now for me, Slack is drinking 500MB, while a single Google Chat tab, created by this company that is so concerned about performance, is at 1.5GB of memory usage.

Google is adding a completely arbitrary limit on how many "rules" content filtering add-ons can include, which are needed to keep up with the nearly infinite ad-serving sites that are out there (by the way, Ars Technica subscriptions give you an ad-free reading experience and make a great holiday gift!).

Mozilla's blog post on the subject promises "Firefox’s implementation of Manifest V3 ensures users can access the most effective privacy tools available like uBlock Origin and other content-blocking and privacy-preserving extensions."


The original article contains 714 words, the summary contains 197 words. Saved 72%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!

load more comments
view more: next ›