this post was submitted on 23 Nov 2023
748 points (98.7% liked)

World News

32359 readers
243 users here now

News from around the world!

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Ghostwurm@lemmy.ca 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Is this actually that Spotify doesn't want to have to qualify value?

[–] Auzy@beehaw.org 2 points 1 year ago

They'd rather pay 200 mil to people like Joe Rogan. It doesn't matter how you look at that deal, he's not worth that much, and there would be 0% chance of getting that money back (thats a lot of additional subscriptions)

[–] Ghostwurm@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Is this actually that Spotify doesn't want to have to qualify value? Remuneration equal across regions? Oof being equitable could get expensive!

[–] sQuirrel21@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Free market.... always look for more ethical options that still fit your music. An ideal platform would be Audius. It's built on blockchain technology but is limited with music content. It would be the perfect way to allow artists to make a living and get rid of the record label kingpins and Spotify pimps forever!

[–] nothingcorporate@lemmy.today -4 points 1 year ago (8 children)

Fuck Spotify. If you don't want to be a 40 year old and buy albums, Deezer and Tidal pay much larger royalties than Spotify.

load more comments (8 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›