A free software to take back control of your videos
Peertube is an open, federated alternative to Youtube without advertising or tracking. On this site, you can find a good Peertube instance, with good rules, good moderation and most importantly a friendly community.
No you can't.
You can watch PeerTube, YouTube, Odyssey, Kick, Twitch and more using GrayJay.
However the only PeerTube instance you can use is FUTO, which only has FUTO videos. But it is open source, so maybe you can go and modify the code for yourself if you're handy like that.
Only their own instance? That's annoying. Newpipe can be used to watch any PeerTube instance, for example
Yes it's unfortunate
Grayjay is not open-source. It's source-available. That still means your comment is true in principle, but don't expect to be able to share your changes with anyone.
Yes it is and I'm not arguing about this again.
So, why can't you say "source-available” or "basically open-source"? For a few weeks, I genuinely thought Grayjay was open-source, because of misinformation that you and others are spreading. It was mere chance that I looked into their LICENSE file, because I was curious to see what open-source license they're using, only to see that they're not.
I'm a software developer, so my interpretation of "open-source" needs to be extremely precise. Open-source has tons of legal implications. Their FUTO TEMPORARY LICENSE breaks some of those implications, which is fine by itself, but if you use the one word in the English language with a clear definition for it, then you're effectively lying to anyone who uses that precise definition.
why can't you say "source-available” or "basically open-source"?
I can but I choose not to.
For a few weeks, I genuinely thought Grayjay was open-source
That's good because it is.
I'm a software developer, so my interpretation of "open-source" needs to be extremely precise.
The only " precision" required is that the source code is open.
If you use the one word in the English language with a clear definition for it, then you're effectively lying to anyone who uses that precise definition.
Whose definition? You're the only one lying.
I am talking about the official definition: https://opensource.org/osd/
The publication of that definition is what caused us to use the word "open-source" in our vocabulary. And the first sentence in that definition is "Open source doesn’t just mean access to the source code.".
When I talk to our legal team at work and tell them that a library is open-source, I'm effectively saying to them that there's no legal restrictions on us using that.
Mere access to the source code does not offer that. You could be granted access to the source code and not even be allowed to modify it, as you suggested to OP.
As far as I can tell, this is the case for Grayjay. So, yes, OP can modify it, assuming they don't get caught doing so.
And I am talking about the simple, self-explanatory phrase.
Less self-explanatory than "source-available", because of that official definition.
Here's a solid recommendation post for PeerTube channels, which you can look through: https://social.growyourown.services/@FediFollows/111291322079656821
If you just want videos from PeerTube and Piped to appear in the same feed, you can do that via an RSS news aggregator. For example, Mozilla Thunderbird has that built in, but there's also tons of small, dedicated applications, depending on what OS you're using, or even as a browser extension.
In PeerTube, you can get an RSS feed, either of your subscription feed directly, or for the individual PeerTube channels, you'd like to subscribe to.
I don't know, if you can also get an RSS feed for your subscription feed in Piped, but you can get it per channel. Just click on the little WiFi-looking button.