this post was submitted on 28 Nov 2023
30 points (84.1% liked)

Canada

7268 readers
648 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Related Communities


🍁 Meta


πŸ—ΊοΈ Provinces / Territories


πŸ™οΈ Cities / Local Communities

Sorted alphabetically by city name.


πŸ’ SportsHockey

Football (NFL): incomplete

Football (CFL): incomplete

Baseball

Basketball

Soccer


πŸ’» Schools / Universities

Sorted by province, then by total full-time enrolment.


πŸ’΅ Finance, Shopping, Sales


πŸ—£οΈ Politics


🍁 Social / Culture


Rules

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage: lemmy.ca


founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Never invade Russia in the winter. Never fight a land war in Asia. Never go for a third term as Prime Minister in Canada. It makes the electorate hate you. I don't complain much about his policies, but Trudeau is screwing his own party over and now we might end up with the Trumpiest of Canadian politicians as PM.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Oderus@lemmy.world 31 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Polling when there's no election is meaningless.

I would say it’s a very noisy signal but not meaningless. Also, one affects the other: the polling affects when there will be an election. Not now!

[–] FireRetardant@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I'm of the belief they use polling to help maintain the status quo of only really having 2 partys people want to choose. The polling helps them ensure no 3rd party steps in and starts gaining traction. A lot of people tell me its a waste of a vote if it isnt for the libs or the cons. The absolute reliance and normality of strategic voting is an obvious sign we are due for electoral reform and some new faces in parliament.

[–] streetfestival@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Agreed. Except this might be useful info for the LPC. If Trudeau's trailing PP by 15 points, maybe it's hard to ignore that a new figurehead is needed for them to be competitive in the election. With all the climate change denialism going on, it'd be so disheartening to elect PP πŸ˜”

[–] Oderus@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

If the Liberals lose the next election, it won't be because of Pierre, it'll be despite Pierre. Like his idol Trump, Bitcoin Millhouse could shoot someone in the face on Sussex road and Conservatives would still vote for him. Liberal voters keep their party in check and will only vote when they do enough good things.

[–] systemglitch@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Because liberals are better humans than conservatives?

[–] Oderus@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Not sure I'd go that far, but I'd say Liberals supporters are less sheep-like than Conservative supporters, generally speaking of course.

[–] systemglitch@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Funny, because I honestly see no difference, they just sheep on different things, same goes for avid NDP supporters.

[–] Oderus@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

There are always sheep, regardless of views. My belief is that Conservatives have 'better' sheep because they rarely ever vote against their own party (even when damaging information comes to light) whereas LPC/NDP share a voter base and often cannibalize each others support.

[–] systemglitch@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

That's fair.

[–] girlfreddy@lemmy.world -1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Wasn't that long ago Chrystia Freeland was supposed to take over the party leadership from Trudeau.

Too bad the old boys' network behind the scenes decided that wasn't good enough and kept JT at the helm ... and now the Libs pay the price for their stupidity.

[–] ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca 5 points 1 year ago

Lol what?

That was just something pushed by Nat post because she’s an easier opponent

[–] corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 year ago

That comment has everything: Drama, conspiracy, betrayal. Best fiction ever.

[–] ag10n@lemmy.world 19 points 1 year ago

Cons need validation in polls because they literally aren’t doing anything else.

[–] xc2215x@lemmy.world 18 points 1 year ago

People looking for a quick fix so they choose Pierre.

[–] AnotherDirtyAnglo@lemmy.ca 15 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Remember everyone: POLLS ARE VOTER MANIPULATION. Polls like this demoralize voters, making them think that the election has already been decided. They pulled the same bullshit in Ontario during Ford's second election -- if "Did not vote" was a political party, it would have taken 80+% of seats in the Ontario Legislature. Instead, less than 17% of eligible voters gave him a 66% majority. Total bullshit.

Spread the word.

[–] stealth_cookies@lemmy.ca 11 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Where is the option for "They are all pieces of shit that shouldn't be running a country" ?

[–] OminousOrange@lemmy.ca 9 points 1 year ago

And if that option wins, a pool of citizens who have marked that they'd be willing to serve a term in government get randomly selected from each riding to fill each seat. You can only serve if you haven't ran federally before.

[–] Zorque@kbin.social 6 points 1 year ago

It's filed under "Useless information that doesn't help anyone".

[–] ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca 10 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

If you ever feel stupid remember there are people that support this clown

[–] asterfield@lemmy.world -1 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca 7 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Poilievre

If you paid attention to any of his policies or speakings then it would be obvious

He even refuses to accept security clearances so how can anyone see him as viable

[–] asterfield@lemmy.world -2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

yeah agreed, but he’s not the only clown in the room

[–] ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 year ago

I guess Annamie Paul and Max Bernier are on his level but they aren’t in the room

[–] Pulptastic@midwest.social 3 points 1 year ago

Is there something in the water?

load more comments
view more: next β€Ί