this post was submitted on 01 Dec 2023
843 points (95.6% liked)

Technology

59657 readers
2871 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

The Cybertruck Is a Disappointment Even to Cybertruck Superfans / Looking at the specs alone, the car is delivering 30 percent less range than expected for 30 percent more money::Looking at the specs alone, the car is delivering 30 percent less range than expected for 30 percent more money.

(page 3) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] kaffiene@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago

And you can bet that the specs are "best case" "ideal conditions" as well. The reality will be worse still

[–] Destraight@lemm.ee 8 points 1 year ago (20 children)

Oh wow, it's actually made from stainless steel and not some shitty mild steel. I should get me one, this would be a lifesaver in Michigan

load more comments (20 replies)
[–] ohlaph@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago

A true waste of money, shocker!

[–] AnUnusualRelic@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago

Each time I see a picture of this thing, it looks uglier than the last time. And it was pretty bad to begin with.

[–] JCreazy@midwest.social 6 points 1 year ago

Don't tell the people on the YouTube comment section on the recent Cyber truck video. So much shilling.

[–] wrinkletip@feddit.nl 6 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Isn't this true for most cars announced way ahead of their time?

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›