this post was submitted on 22 Jul 2026
23 points (89.7% liked)

Privacy

10419 readers
545 users here now

A community for Lemmy users interested in privacy

Rules:

  1. Be civil
  2. No spam posting
  3. Keep posts on-topic
  4. No trolling

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.world/post/49761199

If you have been wondering about the effectiveness of the social media ban of under 15 year olds, this study got you :)

Spoiler: 92%+ of kids age 14-15 in Australia still use it ๐Ÿฅณ

Meanwhile IMO forced verification of users had a much better success rate ๐Ÿ˜‰

Source: https://www.nber.org/system/files/working_papers/w35162/w35162.pdf

top 5 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[โ€“] 87Six@lemmy.zip 3 points 5 days ago (1 children)

So badically, 36% used to not use it because they were too young, but now only 8% don't use it, implying that 28% from that 36% found a way to use it despite age checks?

[โ€“] fizzle@quokk.au 4 points 5 days ago (1 children)

The study talks a lot about a kind of entourage effect. It seems as though, if more than a third of their friends are on social they will attempt to by-pass the age filters. The age filters are reported as "easy" or "very easy" to by-pass. I'm not sure if it's mentioned in this paper but you don't need a fancy vpn or whatever. Some kids draw on a mustache. Some just screw up their face to look wrinkled.

[โ€“] madeindex@lemmy.world 1 points 4 days ago

Hahahahah did not know it was that easy hahahha halloween masks or a tablet with a video of a grown up from a movie probably do the trick then as well

Well that IS surprising.

[โ€“] Kjell@lemmy.world 2 points 5 days ago

It was always going to be difficult to remove social media from kids that are used with it. We will see the effect in the future because it could lead to fewer kids using social media in the future. It might take 5-10 years though.