this post was submitted on 25 Jul 2026
1257 points (95.6% liked)

Fuck AI

7748 readers
2567 users here now

"We did it, Patrick! We made a technological breakthrough!"

A place for all those who loathe AI to discuss things, post articles, and ridicule the AI hype. Proud supporter of working people. And proud booer of SXSW 2024.

AI, in this case, refers to LLMs, GPT technology, and anything listed as "AI" meant to increase market valuations.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] pentastarm@piefed.ca 42 points 3 days ago (4 children)

If those AI techbros could form a coherent thought without AI, they'd be very upset!

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] nanometer1625@thelemmy.club 3 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

This is super dumb. People will just Google their questions instead, and get worse results.

AI is pretty good at helping with very straightforward tax and legal questions. Also, can a lawyer use AI for legal advice? Lawyers are already using AI for a ton of stuff. This sounds hamfisted.

[–] core@leminal.space 6 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Cue the first amendment arguments from the "corporations are people" crowd

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] blarth@thelemmy.club 7 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Trying to save white collar jobs with obstructive law won’t have the effect they think it will.

[–] rhymeswithduck@sh.itjust.works 7 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I'm guessing this isnt about saving jobs, it's about reducing the harm caused by people taking advice from a misinformation machine for complex issues like the law and their physical and mental health.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Aneorthisio@lemmy.ml 4 points 2 days ago

The working class saw this coming decades ago, only to be mocked and told to retrain by the same credentialized individuals who're now crying about AI. Yesterday's push to offshore jobs and today's rush toward digital automation are simply different phases of the exact same economic displacement. It cannot be stopped with legislation in a globalized world where capital flows freely.

[–] obvs@lemmy.world 22 points 3 days ago (5 children)

Counterpoint:

I diagnosed myself with something pretty significant using the internet, and then I went to get evaluated, and my suspicions were confirmed.

This would prevent a lot of good, in addition to preventing some bad.

[–] Calfpupa@lemmy.ml 26 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Using the internet or using a chatbot? Big difference here.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] PhoenixDog@lemmy.world 21 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I diagnosed myself

using the internet

I'm going to assume you researched medical documents, studies, and journals to link things together, and not ask a chat bot "My foot hurts, what is wrong?"

You're smart enough to self diagnose yourself with readily available information to the public, but not smart enough to not know the difference between that and a chat bot. That's remarkable.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] gedfromgont@piefed.ca 10 points 2 days ago

I diagnosed myself

Congrats, glad your life is hopefully changing for the better because of this.

I hate taking the wind out of your sails but this is in the area of anecdotal evidence. You are a single person saying this for your specific case. I am sure we will get another few people confirming the same here.

But what about how many people tried this and got nothing useful out? Or even a misdiagnose? Anyone enthusiastic about this possibility of AI diagnosing people wouldn't really mention this. People like to mention the successes but it needs to be weighed against the failures too, and I don't think there is a good record of that.

If there is, its probably a medical study and I'd venture a guess that AI did not perform as well as a trained doctor.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] melsaskca@lemmy.ca 8 points 2 days ago

"AI's" are fast, for sure, but they are no substitute for human intelligence and knowledge. Mostly a desperate cash grab, because they had no where else to go after cellphones.

[–] NatakuNox@lemmy.world 14 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Should ban it giving finance advice as well. Conservatives and Neo-Liberals already want to give the economy over to Ai companies, what's stopping them from going full circle and making the Ai do all the trading as well?

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] isleepinahammock@lemmy.blahaj.zone 25 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Can we add to this the engineering of any physical object that could threaten human safety? If this keeps up much longer we're going to have buildings falling on top of us.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›