this post was submitted on 03 Dec 2023
306 points (99.0% liked)

Climate - truthful information about climate, related activism and politics.

5289 readers
427 users here now

Discussion of climate, how it is changing, activism around that, the politics, and the energy systems change we need in order to stabilize things.

As a starting point, the burning of fossil fuels, and to a lesser extent deforestation and release of methane are responsible for the warming in recent decades: Graph of temperature as observed with significant warming, and simulated without added greenhouse gases and other anthropogentic changes, which shows no significant warming

How much each change to the atmosphere has warmed the world: IPCC AR6 Figure 2 - Thee bar charts: first chart: how much each gas has warmed the world.  About 1C of total warming.  Second chart:  about 1.5C of total warming from well-mixed greenhouse gases, offset by 0.4C of cooling from aerosols and negligible influence from changes to solar output, volcanoes, and internal variability.  Third chart: about 1.25C of warming from CO2, 0.5C from methane, and a bunch more in small quantities from other gases.  About 0.5C of cooling with large error bars from SO2.

Recommended actions to cut greenhouse gas emissions in the near future:

Anti-science, inactivism, and unsupported conspiracy theories are not ok here.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 24 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] rockSlayer@lemmy.world 47 points 11 months ago (1 children)

COP28 proving again that world leaders won't do shit about climate change. As with everything else, it's time we take matters into our own hands until they actually solve the problem and claim everything was part of their plan.

[–] DogMuffins@discuss.tchncs.de 46 points 11 months ago

So this is going about how we expected.

[–] KnowledgeableNip@leminal.space 30 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Big Oil exec says he likes money and will let millions die to pad his already overinflated bank account.

[–] sir_pronoun@lemmy.world 21 points 11 months ago (1 children)

I mean this is just a joke on so many levels. How could something like this happen?

[–] snooggums@kbin.social 14 points 11 months ago
[–] otter@lemmy.ca 16 points 11 months ago (2 children)

So what is the president selection process like?

[–] silence7@slrpnk.net 40 points 11 months ago

Chosen by the oil dictatorship which runs the host country.

[–] MrMakabar@slrpnk.net 5 points 11 months ago

Legally speaking the president is elected by the Federal Supreme Council, which is made up of the monarchs of the states of the UAE. In practise it is the ruler of Abu Dhabi, until he dies and for a day the ruler of Dubai takes over until they elect the next ruler of Abu Dhabi as president.

[–] 0xtero@kbin.social 13 points 11 months ago

Yeah this outcome was completely out of the blue.

[–] x_cell@slrpnk.net 11 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Choosing Saudi Arabia for this is like choosing the US for an international conference on anti-imperialism.

[–] kwossi@slrpnk.net 2 points 11 months ago (1 children)

or a conference on democracy in north korea

[–] PoisonedPrisonPanda@discuss.tchncs.de 4 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)

A conference about the planets hosted on pluto

[–] Iampossiblyatwork@lemmy.world 2 points 11 months ago (1 children)

That wound is still to fresh.

[–] PoisonedPrisonPanda@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

I always think of how rick and morty portrayed the story about pluto:

Rick and Morty Pluto Is A Planet - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zvcXC-VEUXQ

[–] ininewcrow@lemmy.ca 9 points 11 months ago (1 children)

The problem is not the COP28 president

The problem is that the majority of world leaders, thinkers, academics, professionals and supposed leaders of this conference all decided that this should be the leader of this group.

The whole thing's a joke and I'll meet you all in the post apocalyptic wastelands ... if I or any of us survive.

[–] benjhm@sopuli.xyz 4 points 11 months ago

Actually, it was not a majority decision, it was the turn of the "Asia" UN region to choose the location of this COP. (The previous one - not far away- was theoretically "Africa", and the next one is meant to be eastern-bloc Europe). Of course they could, and should, change the UN traditions (or rebuild from scratch).

[–] kwossi@slrpnk.net 9 points 11 months ago

And then all of these clowns arriving with their stupid government private jets. we would honestly be better of without this.

[–] sonori@beehaw.org 8 points 11 months ago

It is very hard to get a person to understand something when tier job is tied to not understanding it.

[–] CurlyWurlies4All@slrpnk.net 7 points 11 months ago

What a fucking joke

[–] JohnDClay@sh.itjust.works 4 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Isn't climate change like one of the findings with most scientific research and consensus around it? Is he trying to say that we don't 'know' that cutting co2 emissions with cutting oil consumption specifically will help? (Which is also not true) Or I guess he's probably just blatantly lying.

[–] silence7@slrpnk.net 6 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

He's an oil executive, so blatantly lying at the behest of the local royalty which owns the company and country

Dopey dwarf looking MF.

[–] Tabs@beehaw.org 3 points 11 months ago

And that's how it sounds like when you trade integrity for money