246
submitted 3 weeks ago by CubitOom@infosec.pub to c/news@lemmy.world

For more information, either visit the article directly or view the post with quotes in !crimes_of_ice@lemmy.4d2.org

https://lemmy.4d2.org/post/4655055

top 27 comments
sorted by: hot top new old
[-] leadore@lemmy.world 108 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

John Phillips had made it through TSA, had his ID checked and went through facial recognition before agents stopped him as he was boarding, he said.

He says after about five minutes in handcuffs, agents found his Georgia ID and showed him a picture of the man they were actually looking for. “He looks nothing like me, other than that he’s a white guy and I’m a white guy,” Phillips said

Delta and TSA were cooperating with ICE, so at any time through this process, ICE could have examined his ID and compared their faces and everything they needed to figure out he wasn't the guy they were looking for, but it was only after they "pinned him to the wall and put him in handcuffs" and screamed at him, did they look at his ID and decide he wasn't their guy.

What this tells us is that they went through with roughing him up, terrifying him, and inducing PTSD just because they wanted to and knew they could get away with it. They knew he wasn't the person they were looking for, but they weren't going to pass up a chance to have their fun. Sick pieces of shit.

[-] PancakesCantKillMe@lemmy.world 54 points 3 weeks ago

In addition to the reasons you've brought up, it's also a public display of violent enforcement in an effort to further subdue the populace.

[-] chahn.chris@piefed.social 21 points 3 weeks ago

Sounds like this guy has a nice lawsuit on his hands.

[-] leadore@lemmy.world 18 points 3 weeks ago

Unfortunately, he'll be in a long line and either nothing will happen or it go on for years.

[-] EmpathicVagrant@lemmy.world 9 points 3 weeks ago

But in 2057 he’ll get a compensation package of like $3,000 and that’s it

[-] EmpathicVagrant@lemmy.world 0 points 3 weeks ago

But in 2057 he’ll get a compensation package of like $3,000 and that’s it

[-] Tiral@lemmy.world 13 points 3 weeks ago

No one cares. Let me reiterate, no one cares beyond a "thoughts and prayers" bullshit sentiment. They just go "it wasn't me so it isn't my problem" until it's them and no one helps them and they can't figure out why.

Not trying to encite violence, but until people are actually DONE with this shit it won't change and probably get worse. I don't mean hold signs, no one gives a flying crap that you're walking around with a sign. Nothing has changed from a sign since the civil rights movement.

[-] sculptor0725@sh.itjust.works 9 points 3 weeks ago

Nothing has changed from a sign since the civil rights movement.

I hope you don't mean to imply that the civil rights movement was won with chants and signs because it very much wasn't.

[-] shiroininja@lemmy.world 2 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

Then go do something. I want to see you on the news.

[-] ayyy@sh.itjust.works 3 points 3 weeks ago

But I thought the revolution would not be televised.

[-] pelespirit@sh.itjust.works 41 points 3 weeks ago

If you don't understand why, it's always money and corruption for money that drives this administration:

Corporate owners of ICE detention centers report another revenue surge

“Last year was the most successful period of business wins in our company’s history and we expect 2026 to continue to be very active as well,” said George Zoley, chairman and CEO of the GEO Group, during a call with investors.

[-] Taldan@lemmy.world 36 points 3 weeks ago

Delta claiming their role is to ensure customers are treated with respect is hilarious considering they helped ICE jump this guy and slam him against a wall

They're fully complicit because they fear the fascist regime. Looking forward to the day big corporations fear a progressive regime

[-] comador@lemmy.world 0 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

Your blame is misplaced.

Literally 100% of all airlines, both US and EU are required to comply with TSA and European Commission individual EU countries flight security.

Compliance with TSA means allowing TSA to hand over control to ICE whenever they want and there is absolutely nothing a single airline can do about it. If you think they can, then don't fly ever again.

[-] stephen01king@piefed.zip 15 points 3 weeks ago

Compliance to order doesn't absolve you of blame, though?

[-] Quokka@quokk.au 9 points 3 weeks ago

I can’t recall anything famous about just following orders.

It sounds like a good original excuse.

[-] comador@lemmy.world 0 points 3 weeks ago

Then we're all to blame because we all comply with the law or risk going to jail and fines.

[-] stephen01king@piefed.zip 4 points 3 weeks ago

If it's in the process of doing something illegal, then yes, you are to blame.

[-] arrow74@lemmy.zip 5 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

Except that's the neat part. There is nothing illegal about "airline x do not allow that passenger to board" as an order from TSA that's entirely legal thing. You have no "right" to fly and TSA has the completely authority to manage passengers. And this isn't new at all, we're talking Bush administration

ICE detaining and assaulting a US citizen is entirely illegal though.

[-] StupidBrotherInLaw@lemmy.world 2 points 3 weeks ago

I feel one issue that is being ignored is we don't know who from the airline was initially involved and what they were told. What we do know is ICE is notorious for being duplicitous.

While Delta is just another vehicle for the accumulation and concentration of wealth, its employees, the people with whom TSA and ICE directly interface, are largely everyday people like you and I. Without more information, those criticizing the actions of the airline and by extension its employees are doing such based on assumption. They're likely victims of ICE as well, if to a much lesser degree.

[-] frongt@lemmy.zip 3 points 3 weeks ago

Yeah. Obstructing a federal agent is also a crime. Look at that judge who let someone out a side door instead of getting picked up by ICE. She was arrested and charged.

[-] Taldan@lemmy.world 1 points 3 weeks ago

ICE is not TSA. They're both under DHS, but that's where the similarity ends

Further, not even the TSA can compel airlines to do cooperate in an arrest

[-] comador@lemmy.world 1 points 3 weeks ago

ICE is not TSA. They're both under DHS, but that's where the similarity ends

Agreed, never said they were.

Further, not even the TSA can compel airlines to do cooperate in an arrest

If you read the report or watch the video in the link, Delta never had anything to do with the arrest itself.

If an officer of TSA or European Commission individual EU countries flight security asks an airline to defer boarding or step aside, they're required, literally by law to do it:

"The ATSA gives the Transportation Security Administration (TSA) the direct authority to oversee civil aviation security, issue binding security directives to air carriers, and enforce mandatory compliance without prior notice or public comment."

The answer is literally in writing and is agreed upon internationally.

Moral or not, agreeable or not, it is the law.

[-] BaroqueInMind@piefed.social -4 points 3 weeks ago

Get the f@!% out of here with this sober logic and reasonable context. We are trying to nurture reddit nerd outrage and stupidity here.

[-] IrateAnteater@sh.itjust.works 33 points 3 weeks ago

For anyone who may be affected by this type of tactic: delta deals with the upgrades before the boarding process starts, and never will tell you you have to board last. If they tell you that you have to board last, be prepared for some bullshit.

[-] Sprocketfree@sh.itjust.works 2 points 3 weeks ago

Well your first mistake is letting them use facial recognition on you... But also fuck the pigs

this post was submitted on 12 Aug 2026
246 points (100.0% liked)

News

39069 readers
815 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS