this post was submitted on 18 Dec 2023
480 points (97.4% liked)

Technology

59594 readers
2814 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] EvergreenGuru@lemmy.world 192 points 11 months ago (35 children)

This is why you shouldn’t use cloud services for personal security, because the cloud is just someone else’s computer.

[–] deweydecibel@lemmy.world 58 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Also, quit putting unnecessary, Internet connected cameras indoors.

I seriously cannot fathom the amount of people that seem to want to put cameras up in their own bedrooms and just let them stream video constantly.

It has nothing to do with any serious home security, and everything to do with mindless consumerism. Hopefully it's a trend that will pass.

load more comments (33 replies)
[–] crystalmerchant@lemmy.world 141 points 11 months ago (6 children)

LMAO don't put a fucking camera in your bedroom you dummies

[–] Xtallll@lemmy.blahaj.zone 78 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (3 children)

Don't kink shame me! Gaping security violations get me all hot and bothered. Sometimes I check my bank account on public WiFi, just for the thrill.

[–] lolcatnip@reddthat.com 21 points 11 months ago (5 children)

Checking your bank account on public wifi is perfectly safe thanks to TLS.

[–] recapitated@lemmy.world 14 points 11 months ago

There's more to good opsec than encrypted transport, but for most people this is probably true. Maybe also avoid being in camera view especially without MFA.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] tym@lemmy.world 8 points 11 months ago (1 children)

If you want to investigate gaping holes on the internet, you could skip the camera and go straight to pornhub

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] pipows@lemmy.today 26 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Better: don't connect your cameras to the internet

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] jwt@programming.dev 19 points 11 months ago

I'd assume fucking cameras are made specifically for the bedroom.

[–] TORFdot0@lemmy.world 15 points 11 months ago (2 children)

I’m assuming they are in young children’s bedrooms. There’s only one reason to put a camera in an adult’s bedroom ( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] scytale@lemm.ee 135 points 11 months ago (3 children)

This is what you show people when they say they don’t care about privacy because they have nothing to hide.

[–] wafflez@lemmy.world 19 points 11 months ago (1 children)

We should compile a big list of reasons with sources on top of this one

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] ultra@feddit.ro 13 points 11 months ago

Thank you for this comment.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] jet@hackertalks.com 100 points 11 months ago (7 children)

why the fuck would anyone put a camera in their bedroom, or bathroom?

Outside of people making porn, securing the entrances to a home should be sufficient, no need to video yourself sleeping.

[–] 01011@monero.town 72 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (4 children)

They may have people working in their homes whom they do not fully trust - cleaners, maids, nannies etc.

[–] jackoneill@lemmy.world 63 points 11 months ago (5 children)
[–] Engywuck@lemm.ee 30 points 11 months ago (1 children)
[–] Strobelt@lemmy.world 8 points 11 months ago

Or spirits!

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] alekwithak@lemmy.world 9 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Oh geez what do I do?? I've got an Internet connected camera in my hand right now!

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[–] cman6@lemmy.world 67 points 11 months ago (4 children)

I know it's not 100% the same, but there's a website that gives you access to insecure webcams and has been for ages!

http://www.insecam.org/

Obviously these aren't hacked as per the article

[–] Takumidesh@lemmy.world 31 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Ironic that the website itself is http.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] HerbalGamer@sh.itjust.works 9 points 11 months ago (1 children)

just looking around randomly and it's weird how many of them are private property.

[–] netburnr@lemmy.world 8 points 11 months ago (2 children)

Why is it weird? People get cameras to protect their private property?

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] dangblingus@lemmy.dbzer0.com 54 points 11 months ago (4 children)

Yet another reason why IoT crap sucks. You don't need to put everything on the internet. This one should be obvious.

[–] friend_of_satan@lemmy.world 24 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

The "S" in IOT is for "security".

[–] GigglyBobble@kbin.social 15 points 11 months ago (2 children)

People don't think about that. You have to register somewhere in order to use your $12.99 cam, install some app and are good to go.

How would a someone not interested in tech know that the footage data is stored on some online server and you are at the mercy of their itsec.

[–] archomrade@midwest.social 20 points 11 months ago (8 children)

Which is why these companies that are marketing wifi and cloud-polling devices should be held responsible for the data breaches and regulated more rigorously.

It should be cost-prohibitive to design a smart device that sends data to a centralized server, but they do it because the upside value of having the data is so attractive. They shouldn't be allowed to hide behind a ToS agreement with mandatory arbitration when their security is inevitably breached.

load more comments (8 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] books@lemmy.world 14 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Home assistant tries to keep shit local.

[–] baseless_discourse@mander.xyz 11 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (3 children)

depends on the device.

If the device dont provide local connection, there is nothing home assistant can do about it. Some device will also send data to the cloud even it is locally controlled by HA.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] smackjack@lemmy.world 48 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)

Why the fuck do people put security cameras in their bedrooms? It's so weird to me that people do this. Even if you think (or at least thought) that you were the only one with access to the footage, won't the presence of a camera make you feel like you're being watched? Are we not on camera enough as it is that we have to be on camera in the supposed privacy of our bedrooms? Imagine if you told George Orwell that people would willingly put cameras in their most personal and private spaces.

[–] Water@real.lemmy.fan 22 points 11 months ago

Some do it to potentially document accidents - I know some racial minorities in my country that say they are accused of child abuse and investigated at the drop of the hat if they bring their kid to the doctor and they have any kind of bruise. I heard of a Muslim woman who lost custody of her kid for 48 hours until she was able to produce CCTV footage of her child breaking his arm in a playground accident, and not due to some act of child abuse.

So,, having a cam that catches your kid experiencing an innocuous fall wherever it may be in the house is a good security measure, particularly if the justice system comes at you preloaded with bias.

[–] nutsack@lemmy.world 15 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

it's funny the vnexpress would publish this. vietnamese people are obsessed with security cameras. they see them as a deterrent, or as a way to find the perpetrator later and get all your property back. they put them everywhere.

[–] fhek@lemmy.dbzer0.com 14 points 11 months ago (15 children)

Hypothetically I want to secure my home with Cameras…

What’s the best way to do this? OSS preferably.

[–] Vorticity@lemmy.world 21 points 11 months ago

So, just an FYI, I bought Eufy cameras because I believed their marketing bullshit about being secure and end-to-end encrypted. About two months later they changed how they describe their security and quietly modified their privacy policy. Turns out they're not really end-to-end encrypted and it is possible to gain access to the streams sometimes.

My recommendation, after doing my research is not to buy anything that is able to be viewed remotely. Buy something that stores the video locally, in your home. If possible, buy and install wired cameras.

[–] recapitated@lemmy.world 14 points 11 months ago

The most important thing is just to have cameras that are positioned to watch you in bed.

[–] vpklotar@lemmy.world 8 points 11 months ago

I'm just about to setup TP-link cameras connected to Frigate (NVR software) with a Coral TPU for offline object detection. This means I can block access to internet for the cameras and use a VPN home if I want to watch them.

load more comments (12 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›