this post was submitted on 18 Dec 2023
178 points (96.8% liked)

Not The Onion

12540 readers
437 users here now

Welcome

We're not The Onion! Not affiliated with them in any way! Not operated by them in any way! All the news here is real!

The Rules

Posts must be:

  1. Links to news stories from...
  2. ...credible sources, with...
  3. ...their original headlines, that...
  4. ...would make people who see the headline think, “That has got to be a story from The Onion, America’s Finest News Source.”

Comments must abide by the server rules for Lemmy.world and generally abstain from trollish, bigoted, or otherwise disruptive behavior that makes this community less fun for everyone.

And that’s basically it!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Emails obtained by Texas Monthly suggest the Texas Historical Commission was concerned about retaliation from lawmakers for carrying the books.

top 8 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] NounsAndWords@lemmy.world 82 points 1 year ago (2 children)

"Ugh, I wish I could just learn about the Southern pre-industrial economy without have to hear all this stuff about slavery..."

[–] moshankey@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago

Oh dear, I almost choked when I read this. Well played.

[–] 3ntranced@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

I don't think there would be even a leaflet of material let alone a whole book.

[–] Taco2112@lemmy.world 50 points 1 year ago (1 children)

When a Historical Society is in fear of retaliation from law makers because they were teaching history, there’s obviously a big problem.

[–] mosiacmango@lemm.ee 20 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

This was a manufactured problem used as an excuse to remove the books.

Basically a YouTuber karen has made it their personal mission to remove the books because she liked every about plantation history except acknowledging that "brutal enslavement" bit, so she makes a video about it and sends the video along with threats of contacting the legislature about the books to some low level party involved with the texas commission.

The spineless weasel watches the video, agrees with it, and then escalates the threat to the "historical society" leadership, which is all directly appointed by the executive branch of texas. They tell the weasel that they prefer to talk face to face, i.e "no records you idiot," then suddenly 20+ books about slavery disappear from plantation gift shops, under the premise that a book must "be directly applicable to texas history." Of course, some of those books about slavery are directly applicable, but they are still gone. Southern Cookbooks, books about flowers, things that are not applicable to texas history stuck around no problem.

This was a ginned up controversy, and all the parties involved worked together to remove books about slavery from slave plantations because they all wanted them gone.

This article has a deeper dive into what happened.

[–] cjoll4@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

This article has a deeper dive into what happened.

That's the exact same article as the OP. Did you mean to link a different article?

[–] mosiacmango@lemm.ee 7 points 1 year ago

Yes indeed. Good catch. Ive fixed it now with this one.

[–] outrageousmatter@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago

That woman is a fucking asshole, censuring the brutality on slavery of the plantation that had majority of the history there. She definitely wants to glorify slavery to be good and wants it back as there is no someone believes this unless she is trying to change it was acceptable to own people at time and that people should own slaves again. She should have her channel remove for misinformation. At the time slavery was brutal, and was not socially acceptable to some at the time as some of the founding father wanted to end slavery in america even though they were hypocrites some wanted to end slavery.