this post was submitted on 21 Dec 2023
150 points (99.3% liked)

politics

19120 readers
2107 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
all 23 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] dhork@lemmy.world 89 points 11 months ago

The filing also listed President Joe Biden's son, Hunter Biden, as a creditor, without specifying the amount Giuliani owed him.

Aha! It's the smoking gun that they've been looking for all along! Direct evidence that Hunter Biden is accepting payments from a foreign agent!

[–] negativenull@startrek.website 49 points 11 months ago (1 children)

The picture provided in that article is gold:
Giuliani

[–] badbytes@lemmy.world 5 points 11 months ago

Yeah, probably the best thing in article.

[–] MegaUltraChicken@lemmy.world 16 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Someone better post that sweet Riker gif...

[–] ummthatguy@lemmy.world 29 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Ok, I did the thing. Now what? Also great username! It is only legend.

[–] _number8_@lemmy.world 16 points 11 months ago (4 children)

this is very very funny but also don't these sort of business ghouls just see this as paperwork and not a horrible shame thing like we would? like a sacrifice bunt or something

[–] AlwaysNowNeverNotMe@kbin.social 14 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Ya I think drumpf filed like 4 times and people still think he can run a business.

[–] meco03211@lemmy.world 4 points 11 months ago (3 children)

But he can run a business. Not well, mind you. But he can surely run it.

[–] gregorum@lemm.ee 6 points 11 months ago

Soon, he won’t be able to run one in the state of New York, lol

[–] AlwaysNowNeverNotMe@kbin.social 5 points 11 months ago

Legally he can't in a few states now.

[–] Psaldorn@lemmy.world 2 points 11 months ago

Anyone can run businesses into the ground

[–] Nommer@sh.itjust.works 12 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)

I guess I don't fully understand how someone can file for bankruptcy but still be rich after. If all it does is ruin your credit for 10 years or whatever the cutoff is, then why should the rich care if they file? They already have money and enough of it that investors don't really care about their credit. Shouldn't the government be garnishing wages or something at least?

[–] lobut@lemmy.ca 5 points 11 months ago

Yeah I don't know how Alex Jones is just going along telling the government to get wrecked.

[–] krellor@kbin.social 10 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

There are different types of bankruptcy, for both businesses and individuals. One form of bankruptcy occurs when you plan to pay your creditors but need the courts help to consolidate and set terms because you have too many creditors or terms you can't comply with. There is also a kind that allows you to discharge certain types of debt.

I'd have to look into it but I'm guessing Giuliani is filling the structuring his debt kind because he owes dramatically more than he is worth. His debt likely can't be fully discharged in bankruptcy, but a judge can allow for the orderly sale of assets and structuring of payment, rather than a repossession frenzy.

Edit: he filed for chapter 11, which is the kind that will restructure his assets and set up a payment plan to his creditors, including the recent legal judgements against him.

[–] frezik@midwest.social 2 points 11 months ago

Many do, but probably not this time. Trump stopped taking his phone calls a while back, and he was scratching around for loose change, like doing Cameo. He probably doesn't have $147M in assets.

[–] Pratai@lemmy.ca 7 points 11 months ago (2 children)

Real men should honor their debts. What a fucking coward.

[–] SCB@lemmy.world 2 points 11 months ago (1 children)

I agree with your general view of Giuliani, but disparaging bankruptcy isn't the way to go.

More debts should be dismissable via bankruptcy, imo

[–] Pratai@lemmy.ca 11 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)

Bankruptcy is for people with no other option. Not for clowns to use to get out of paying warranted fines for having been a piece of shit grifting traitor.

[–] SCB@lemmy.world 3 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Real men should honor their debts

This has nothing to do with your response, though.

Bankruptcy for student loan debt would change millions of lives, as an example.

[–] Pratai@lemmy.ca 0 points 11 months ago

And as I said, bankruptcy to get out of paying a debt they can afford is for pieces of shit.

[–] ares35@kbin.social 6 points 11 months ago

watch him get jail time for faking his financials.

[–] jordanlund@lemmy.world 3 points 11 months ago

Amazed he had enough money to file TBH.