this post was submitted on 20 Jul 2023
684 points (78.1% liked)

World News

39096 readers
2713 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
(page 3) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] WhiteHawk@lemmy.world 11 points 1 year ago (3 children)

As usual, the title is clickbait. It's not "eating meat" that produces 4 times more greenhouse gases, it's a high-meat diet. Big difference that is conveniently left out of the title to get more clicks.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] decripter37@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (12 children)

Since it isn't mentioned in the article, here is the reference: paper (2014)

In the study it even shows how driving a 10 years car for 6000 miles is rougly two years of saved emission with a meat->vegan switch.

I don't know, changing dietary is obviously good for the health, but these results seems to make pretty useless changes, use the bike and save twice as much.

EDIT: There is a new paper (2023), it is in a reply.

load more comments (12 replies)
[–] irotsoma@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago (8 children)

Yeah 4 times 0.0000000000000000000000001% of what the largest companies produce.

[–] TurtleJoe@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago (6 children)

Do any of those companies help to produce beef?

Most companies create products to sell to consumers.

load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (7 replies)
[–] Fedizen@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago

lower than I would expect

[–] Blackmist@feddit.uk 9 points 1 year ago (27 children)

Having fewer children is the number one thing you can do. And it's not even close.

I mean, do the other things anyway. They can't hurt. But they won't save an overpopulated planet.

[–] veganpizza69@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago

It's not "one thing" option, you can do most of those, even all of them.

load more comments (26 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›